IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aare09/47649.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Developing an auditing tool to measure community capacity of using market based instruments

Author

Listed:
  • Shi, Tian

Abstract

Community capacity is essential for the design, development and implementation of MBIs, therefore it is important to be able to measure and monitor it over time. Community MBIs capacity audit is a means to identifying, developing and harnessing a community’s capacity to strengthen and develop stakeholder’s MBI awareness, and support local groups in achieving positive NRM and environmental outcomes. In this paper, an auditing tool is proposed to profile and increase communities’ capacity of using MBIs. The assessment provides sound quantitative results and graphic outputs that are easy for community individuals, groups and organizations to access and interpret. The profile allows a wide range of stakeholders to self-assess their MBIs capacity, from which will form the basis for community MBIs capacity-building strategic planning (eg, initiating relevant and targeted training and education programs).

Suggested Citation

  • Shi, Tian, 2009. "Developing an auditing tool to measure community capacity of using market based instruments," 2009 Conference (53rd), February 11-13, 2009, Cairns, Australia 47649, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aare09:47649
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.47649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/47649/files/Shi.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.47649?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shi, Tian & Gill, Roderic, 2005. "Developing effective policies for the sustainable development of ecological agriculture in China: the case study of Jinshan County with a systems dynamics model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 223-246, April.
    2. Shi, Tian, 2006. "Applying MBIs for sustainable natural resource and environmental management in South Australia: Challenges and opportunities," 2006 Conference (50th), February 8-10, 2006, Sydney, Australia 139901, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rui Jun Qin & Ho Hon Leung, 2021. "Becoming a Traditional Village: Heritage Protection and Livelihood Transformation of a Chinese Village," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-28, February.
    2. Sahan T. M. Dissanayake, 2016. "Using STELLA simulation models to teach natural resource economics," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 40-48, January.
    3. Li, Fu Jia & Dong, Suo Cheng & Li, Fei, 2012. "A system dynamics model for analyzing the eco-agriculture system with policy recommendations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 34-45.
    4. Siti Hanani Isa & Mohd Noor Afiq Ramlee & Muhamad Safiih Lola & Mhd Ikhwanuddin & Mohamad N Azra & Mohd Tajuddin Abdullah & Syerrina Zakaria & Yahaya Ibrahim, 2021. "A system dynamics model for analysing the eco-aquaculture system of integrated aquaculture park in Malaysia with policy recommendations," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 511-533, January.
    5. Minjie Li & Jian Wang & Yihui Chen, 2019. "Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Sustainable Development Capability of Agriculture in Countries along the Belt and Road Route," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-28, April.
    6. Sanjay Taneja & Mukul Bhatnagar & Pawan Kumar & Ramona Rupeika-Apoga, 2023. "India’s Total Natural Resource Rents (NRR) and GDP: An Augmented Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) Bound Test," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-14, February.
    7. Dipsikha Dasgupta & Anupam Debsarkar & Tumpa Hazra & B. K. Bala & Amitava Gangopadhyay & Debasish Chatterjee, 2017. "Scenario of future e-waste generation and recycle-reuse-landfill-based disposal pattern in India: a system dynamics approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1473-1487, August.
    8. Hernandez, Juan M. & Leon, Carmelo J., 2007. "The interactions between natural and physical capitals in the tourist lifecycle model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 184-193, April.
    9. Lauriane MOUYSSET & Luc DOYEN & Jean-Christophe PEREAU & Fréderic JIGUET, 2013. "A double benefit of biodiversity in agriculture," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2013-04, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    10. Akopov, Andranik S. & Beklaryan, Levon A. & Saghatelyan, Armen K., 2017. "Agent-based modelling for ecological economics: A case study of the Republic of Armenia," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 346(C), pages 99-118.
    11. Baur, Ivo & Binder, Claudia R., 2015. "Modeling and assessing scenarios of common property pastures management in Switzerland," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 292-305.
    12. Mouysset, L. & Doyen, L. & Jiguet, F. & Allaire, G. & Leger, F., 2011. "Bio economic modeling for a sustainable management of biodiversity in agricultural lands," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(4), pages 617-626, February.
    13. Srinivasan, Sunderasan, 2008. "Positive externalities of domestic biogas initiatives: Implications for financing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(5), pages 1476-1484, June.
    14. BenDor, Todd & Scheffran, Jürgen & Hannon, Bruce, 2009. "Ecological and economic sustainability in fishery management: A multi-agent model for understanding competition and cooperation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 1061-1073, February.
    15. Hazrati, Manochehr & Bafandeh Zendeh, Alireza & Aali, Samad, 2020. "Modeling of Real Estate Income Tax: System Dynamics Approach," Journal of Money and Economy, Monetary and Banking Research Institute, Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 15(4), pages 463-487, October.
    16. Yanis Elalamy & Luc Doyen & Lauriane Mouysset, 2019. "Contribution of the land use allocation model for agroecosystems: The case of Torrecchia Vecchia," Post-Print hal-03143304, HAL.
    17. Lauriane MOUYSSET & Luc DOYEN & Fréderic JIGUET, 2012. "How does the economic risk aversion affect biodiversity?," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2012-03, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    18. Gloria Lentijo & Mark Hostetler, 2013. "Effects of a participatory bird census project on knowledge, attitudes and behaviors of coffee farmers in Colombia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 199-223, February.
    19. Zeng, Yangmei & Zhang, Junbiao & He, Ke, 2019. "Effects of conformity tendencies on households’ willingness to adopt energy utilization of crop straw: Evidence from biogas in rural China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 573-584.
    20. Gabriela KOLACKOVA & Igor KREJCI & Ivana TICHA, 2017. "Dynamics of the small farmers' behaviour - scenario simulations," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(3), pages 103-120.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare09:47649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.