IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea17/258227.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Experimental Economics Investigation of the Land Value Tax: Efficiency, Acceptability, and Positional Goods

Author

Listed:
  • Duke, Joshua M.
  • Gao, TianHang

Abstract

This research offers the first economic experiment investigating the land tax, where landowners invest under different property tax regimes. A voting treatment assesses the relative acceptability of land value taxation. Results show a land tax produced greater overall welfare in only 37.5% of the experiment sessions. Systematic overinvestment arises from the positional-good characteristic of residential land investment, but this effect vanishes when the positional-good indicator is removed. The experiments show that the participants unexpectedly voted in favor of the land tax, suggesting that the efficiency and acceptability of the land tax may be more complex than in nonbehavioral economics modeling.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Duke, Joshua M. & Gao, TianHang, 2017. "An Experimental Economics Investigation of the Land Value Tax: Efficiency, Acceptability, and Positional Goods," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258227, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea17:258227
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.258227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/258227/files/Abstracts_17_05_22_12_06_54_56__128_4_205_173_0.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.258227?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johanna Jauernig & Stephan Brosig & Silke Hüttel, 2023. "Profession and residency matter: Farmers' preferences for farmland price regulation in Germany," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(3), pages 816-834, September.
    2. Buchholz, Matthias & Danne, Michael & Musshoff, Oliver, 2022. "An experimental analysis of German farmers’ decisions to buy or rent farmland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. Joshua M. Duke & TianHang Gao, 2023. "Land Value Taxation: A Spatially Explicit Economic Experiment with Endogenous Institutions," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 673-694, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Institutional and Behavioral Economics; Land Economics/Use; Community/Rural/Urban Development;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H21 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
    • H71 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea17:258227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.