IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea03/22047.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Impact Of Swine Production On Land Values In Illinois

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Haixiao
  • Sherrick, Bruce J.
  • Gomez, Miguel I.
  • Miller, Gay Y.

Abstract

Based on a spatiotemporal hedonic farmland price model and county-level data in Illinois from 1979 to 1999, we examined the impact of swine production on farmland values. Our results show that, in addition to the conventional determinants of farmland values, an increase in swine production intensity has a negative relationship with farmland values while an increase in swine operation scale had a positive association with farmland values at the county level in Illinois. We also estimate the impact of changes in the Illinois swine industry over the period 1980-1999 on farmland values at the state level and find that changes in swine inventory and scale of swine operations have led to changes in farmland prices from $-10.56 to $62.96 per acre. In general, the changes in Illinois swine industry increase farmland values in Illinois.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Haixiao & Sherrick, Bruce J. & Gomez, Miguel I. & Miller, Gay Y., 2003. "The Impact Of Swine Production On Land Values In Illinois," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22047, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea03:22047
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.22047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/22047/files/sp03hu08.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.22047?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abeles-Allison, Mark & Connor, Larry J., 1990. "An Analysis of Local Benefits and Costs of Michigan Hog Operations Experiencing Environmental Conflicts," Agricultural Economic Report Series 201396, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vinicio Vannucci & Loredana Torsello, 2006. "Economic assessment of odour emissions: an application of Hedonic Price Method," Department of Economics University of Siena 485, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    2. Hurley, Sean P. & Miller, Douglas J. & Kliebenstein, James B., 2006. "Estimating Willingness to Pay Using a Polychotomous Choice Function: An Application to Pork Products with Environmental Attributes," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 31(2), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Bayoh, Isaac & Irwin, Elena G. & Roe, Brian E., 2004. "The Value Of Clean Dairy Air: Accounting For Endogeneity And Spatially Correlated Errors In A Hedonic Analyses Of The Impact Of Animal Operations On Local Property Values," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20364, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Uter, Zachary & Hadrich, Joleen C., 2023. "Estimating the Impact of Swine Feedlots on Residential Values in Southern Minnesota," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2023, January.
    5. Robert Deacon & Felix Schläpfer, 2010. "The Spatial Range of Public Goods Revealed Through Referendum Voting," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 47(3), pages 305-328, November.
    6. Hodge, Timothy R., 2011. "The Effect of Ethanol Plants on Residential Property Values: Evidence from Michigan," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 41(2), pages 1-20.
    7. Ready, Richard C. & Abdalla, Charles W., 2003. "The Amenity And Disamenity Impacts Of Agriculture: Estimates From A Hedonic Pricing Model In Southeastern Pennsylvania," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22196, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Joseph A. Herriges & Silvia Secchik & JBruce A. Babcock, 2005. "Living with Hogs in Iowa: The Impact of Livestock Facilities on Rural Residential Property Values," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 81(4).
    9. Ro, Kuo-Chang, 1997. "Hog industry and hog production related water pollution problem in Taiwan: an application to valuing the willingness to pay for improving water quality," ISU General Staff Papers 1997010108000018180, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    10. Poe, Gregory, 1997. ""Maximizing the Environmental Benefits per Dollar Expended" An Economic Interpretation and Review of Agricultural Environmental Benefits and Costs," EB Series 186405, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    11. Ran, Tao & Zhao, Jinhua, 2005. "Impacts of Livestock Operations: A Gaussian Dispersion Hedonic Approach," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19116, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    12. Hans R. Isakson & Mark D. Ecker, 2008. "An analysis of the impact of swine CAFOs on the value of nearby houses," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 39(3), pages 365-372, November.
    13. Leah Greden Mathews, 2002. "Junk Car Clash on the Rural—Urban Fringe: A Case Study in Local Government Decision Making," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 24(2), pages 528-539.
    14. Garsow, James D. & Connor, Larry J. & Nott, Sherrill B., 1992. "Impact of Michigan Dairy Manure Handling Alternatives," Agricultural Economic Report Series 201421, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Land Economics/Use;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea03:22047. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.