IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaae16/252534.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The New Frontier: Welfare Effects of Foreign Biofuel Investments in Africa (Case Study: Sierra Leone)

Author

Listed:
  • Lakoh, Kepifri
  • Perrin, Richard K.
  • Fulginiti, Lilyan

Abstract

This research analyzes the market and welfare effects of foreign biofuel investments into Sierra Leone. A log-linear comparative static displacement model is used to carry out the analysis. A 30% demand shock was introduced into the equilibrium system to represent an increase in biofuel demand as a result of increased foreign biofuel investments. Results revealed large welfare enhancing gains for consumers of inedible biofuels but resulted in welfare losses in the staples and edible biofuel consumer markets. Producers (farmers) generally reported welfare gains by virtue of owning factor inputs (land and other). Equilibrium quantities of inedible biofuels, edible biofuels and food increased by about 8.8%, decreased by 0.22% and increased by 0.6% respectively. Prices for both inputs and outputs increased while quantities of inputs also increased.

Suggested Citation

  • Lakoh, Kepifri & Perrin, Richard K. & Fulginiti, Lilyan, 2016. "The New Frontier: Welfare Effects of Foreign Biofuel Investments in Africa (Case Study: Sierra Leone)," 2016 Fifth International Conference, September 23-26, 2016, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 252534, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaae16:252534
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.252534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/252534/files/The%20New%20Frontier%20_Kepifri%20A.%20Lakoh1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.252534?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard F. Muth, 1964. "The Derived Demand Curve Fora Productive Factor And The Industrysupply Curve," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 221-234.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lee, Yunkyung & Perrin, Richard K. & Fulginiti, Lilyan E., 2022. "Potential Economic Impacts of Gene-edited High-oleic Soybeans," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322392, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Lee, Yunkyung, 2020. "Potential economic consequences of gene-edited technology on the U.S. soybean market," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304241, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Lee, Yunkyung, 2021. "Potential market and welfare effects of genetically edited technology in U.S. soybean production," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 314058, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Noel Perceval Assogba & Daowei Zhang, 2020. "An Economic Analysis of Tropical Forest Resource Conservation in a Protected Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-12, July.
    2. Eivind Hestvik Braekkan & Sverre Braathen Thyholdt, 2014. "The Bumpy Road of Demand Growth--An Application to Atlantic Salmon," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 29(4), pages 339-350.
    3. Allison Bauman & Dawn Thilmany McFadden, 2017. "Exploring Localized Economic Dynamics: Methods-Driven Case Studies of Transformation and Growth in Agricultural and Food Markets," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 31(3), pages 244-254, August.
    4. Zhang, Xufang & Sun, Changyou & Munn, Ian A. & Gordon, Jason, 2021. "How to protect the U.S. forest products industry from the perspective of trade? A comparison of policies within the forest supply chain," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    5. Edwards, Clark, 1985. "U.S. Agriculture's Potential to Supply World Food Markets," Agricultural Economic Reports 307995, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Estes, Edmund A., 1988. "Immigration Reform And Perishable Crop Agriculture," 1988 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Knoxville, Tennessee 270188, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    7. Ryu, Kyung Hwan & Kim, Boeun & Heo, Seongmin, 2022. "Sustainability analysis framework based on global market dynamics: A carbon capture and utilization industry case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    8. Zhai, Jun & Kuusela, Olli-Pekka, 2022. "Incidence of domestic subsidies vs. export taxes: An equilibrium displacement model of log and lumber markets in Oregon," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    9. J. P. Voon & G. W. Edwards, 1991. "Research Payoff From Quality Improvement: The Case Of Backfat Depth In Pigs," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 66-76, January.
    10. Gonzalez-Martinez, Ana & Jongeneel, Roel & Salamon, Petra, 2021. "Lighting on the Road to Explore Future Directions for Agricultural Modelling in the EU – some Considerations on what Needs to be Done," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 12(03), September.
    11. Cloé Garnache & Pierre Mérel, 2022. "Environmental Policy in General Equilibrium: New Insights from a Canonical Model," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 9(1), pages 113-140.
    12. Ali, Mubarik & Ahmed, Faryal & Channa, Hira & Davies, Stephen, 2016. "Pakistan’s fertilizer sector: Structure, policies, performance, and impacts," IFPRI discussion papers 1516, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    13. Gwilym Pryce, 1999. "Construction Elasticities and Land Availability: A Two-stage Least-squares Model of Housing Supply Using the Variable Elasticity Approach," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(13), pages 2283-2304, December.
    14. Yaghoob Jafari & Jamal Othman & Peter Witzke & Sufian Jusoh, 2017. "Risks and opportunities from key importers pushing for sustainability: the case of Indonesian palm oil," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 5(1), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Benjamin Henderson & Lynn Henry & Gordon MacAulay & Jen Tatuh, 2010. "Potential Payoff from R&D in the Coconut Industry of North Sulawesi, Indonesia," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 24(1), pages 69-85, March.
    16. Gluszak, Michal & Zygmunt, Robert, 2018. "Development density, administrative decisions, and land values: An empirical investigation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 153-161.
    17. Antimiani, Alessandro & Costantini, Valeria & Martini, Chiara & Salvatici, Luca & Tommasino, Maria Cristina, 2013. "Assessing alternative solutions to carbon leakage," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 299-311.
    18. Peyton Ferrier & Chen Zhen, 2014. "The producer welfare effects of trade liberalization when goods are perishable and habit-forming: the case of asparagus," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 45(2), pages 129-141, March.
    19. Yu, Jisang & Villoria, Nelson B. & Hendricks, Nathan P., 2022. "The incidence of foreign market tariffs on farmland rental rates," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    20. Brady, Michael P. & Gallardo, R. Karina & Badruddozza, Syed & Jiang, Xiaojiao, 2016. "Regional Equilibrium Wage Rate for Hired Farm Workers in the Tree Fruit Industry," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 15(01), pages 1-12.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy; Community/Rural/Urban Development; International Development; Resource/Energy Economics and Policy;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaae16:252534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaaeaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.