IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaae07/51998.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Compétitivité de la filière anacarde au Bénin: une analyse des effets aux prix de référence

Author

Listed:
  • Oloukoi, L.
  • Adegbola, Patrice Ygue

Abstract

La politique agricole du Bénin connaît depuis quelques années, de profonds changements. En effet, les différentes imperfections du marché et les risques liés à la monoculture ont amené l’Etat à opter pour une diversification agricole. Ainsi, neuf (09) filières dont la filière anacarde sont identifiées comme prioritaires. Cette étude utilise la Matrice d’Analyse des Politiques (MAP) pour évaluer la compétitivité des différents segments de la filière anacarde au Bénin. A cet effet, une enquête quantitative est menée auprès des différents acteurs à savoir 198 producteurs, 61 commerçants et 7 transformateurs. Les résultats issus de l’étude montrent que les systèmes de production, de commercialisation et de transformation de la filière sont tous compétitifs. Les systèmes de production les plus compétitifs sont ceux utilisant les plantules issues de sélection des semences améliorées comme mode de semi de l’anacarde. L’étude conclut aussi que la filière avec le système de transformation voit sa compétitivité s’améliorée. Par contre, le système de commercialisation, dans son organisation actuelle ne favorise pas les producteurs. De tout ce qui précède, il est à retenir que toute politique de diversification orientée vers le développement de la filière anacarde sera bénéfique pour les acteurs concernés et pour la nation. Cette politique devra surtout viser à amener les producteurs à pratiquer les systèmes de production les plus compétitifs et à résorber les divergences d’intérêts observées entre les producteurs qui sont les plus grands perdants et les commerçants.

Suggested Citation

  • Oloukoi, L. & Adegbola, Patrice Ygue, 2008. "Compétitivité de la filière anacarde au Bénin: une analyse des effets aux prix de référence," 2007 Second International Conference, August 20-22, 2007, Accra, Ghana 51998, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaae07:51998
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.51998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/51998/files/Oloukoi.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.51998?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cheng Fang & John C. Beghin, 2000. "Food Self-Sufficiency, Comparative Advantage, and Agricultural Trade: A Policy Analysis Matrix for Chinese Agriculture," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 99-wp223, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    2. Mohanty, Samarendu & Fang, Cheng & Chaudhary, Jagadanand, 2003. "Assessing the Competitiveness of Indian Cotton Production: A Policy Analysis Matrix Approach," Cotton Economics Research Institute CER Series 53142, Texas Tech University, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fatah, Fazleen Abdul & Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan Von, 2017. "Profitability and Competitiveness of Rice Farming in Malaysia: A Policy Analysis Matrix," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 14(2), December.
    2. Junshi Li & Yao Pan, 2023. "EU and China’s comparative advantage, trade complementarity and trade specialization dynamics in agricultural products," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 351-379, September.
    3. Sanderson, Todd & Ahmadi-Esfahani, Fredoun Z., 2010. "Climate change and Australia’s comparative advantage in broadacre agriculture," 2010 Conference, August 26-27, 2010, Nelson, New Zealand 96493, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    4. Sina Xie & Orachos Napasintuwong, 2014. "Review of Rice Policies in China, Thailand and Vietnam," Working Papers 201403, Kasetsart University, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    5. Charles Peter Mgeni & Stefan Sieber & T. S. Amjath-Babu & Khamaldin Daud Mutabazi, 2018. "Can protectionism improve food security? Evidence from an imposed tariff on imported edible oil in Tanzania," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(4), pages 799-806, August.
    6. Wusheng Yu & Hans G. Jensen, 2010. "China’s Agricultural Policy Transition: Impacts of Recent Reforms and Future Scenarios," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 343-368, June.
    7. Pakravan, Mohammad Reza & Kalashami, Mohammad Kavoosi, 2011. "Future prospects of Iran, U.S and Turkey's Pistachio exports," International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development (IJAMAD), Iranian Association of Agricultural Economics, vol. 1(3), pages 1-8, September.
    8. Tayyaba Hina & Muhammad Asad ur Rehman Naseer, 2019. "Impact of Better Management Practices on Sustainable Cotton Production: Evidence from South Punjab," Journal of Economic Impact, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 1(3), pages 92-97.
    9. Touré, Ali A. & Groenewald, Jan & Seck, Papa Abdoulaye & Diagne, Aliou, 2013. "Analysing policy-induced effects on the performance of irrigated rice," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 8(01), pages 1-10, July.
    10. Esquivias, M.A., 2017. "The Change of Comparative Advantage of Agricultural Activities in East Java Within the Context of Asean Economic Integration," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 9(01), March.
    11. Pakravan, Mohammad Reza & Kalashami, Mohammad Kavoosi, 2011. "Determination of target Exchange rate for the comparative advantage of Iran crops (A Case of Sari Township)," International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development (IJAMAD), Iranian Association of Agricultural Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 1-6, June.
    12. Strutt, Anna & Turner, James A. & Garrett, Lynn & Haack, Robert A. & Olson, Lars, 2010. "Economic Impact and Global Trade Implications of Phytosanitary Treatments for Wood Packaging Material," Conference papers 332013, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    13. Fazleen, Abdul & Stephan, Von Cramon, 2015. "The Policy Analysis Matrix of Profitability and Competitiveness of Rice Farming in Malaysia," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 210872, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Samarendu Mohanty & E. Wesley & F. Peterson, 2005. "Food security and government interventions: A study of Indian grain markets," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 337-352.
    15. Samarendu Mohanty & Cheng Fang & Jagadanand Chaudhary, 2002. "Assessing the Competitiveness of Indian Cotton Production: A Policy Analysis Matrix Approach," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 02-wp301, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    16. Gillson, I & Poulton, Colin & Balcombe, Kelvin & Page, S, 2004. "Understanding the impact of Cotton Subsidies on developing countries," MPRA Paper 15373, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Irfan Ahmed Baig & Sami Ullah & Shoaib Nasir, 2023. "Policy Impacts on Comparative Advantage and Production Protection to Cotton and Its Competing Crops in Pakistan (Article)," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 62(4), pages 539-551.
    18. Colby, Hunter & Diao, Xinshen & Somwaru, Agapi, 2000. "Cross-Commodity Analysis of China's Grain Sector: Sources of Growth and Supply Response," Technical Bulletins 33565, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    19. Qi Mengyang, 2020. "The Study on the Agricultural Trade Pattern Between China and Central and Eastern Europe Countries Under the “16 + 1” Cooperation Mechanism," HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 69-78, April.
    20. Cheng, Fuzhi, 2008. "China: Shadow WTO agricultural domestic support notifications," IFPRI discussion papers 793, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaae07:51998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaaeaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.