IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aep/anales/4567.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Influenciadores y su importancia para la adopción de bitcoin

Author

Listed:
  • Emiliano Giupponi

Abstract

El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar los motivos de la demanda de bitcoin. Para ello, se construye un modelo de generaciones superpuestas que incluye actores influyentes y seguidores. La conjetura es que la demanda de bitcoin está asociada a un parámetro de influencia que responde al comportamiento de estos actores. Para la evaluación empírica, se construyen conjuntos de datos que estiman el comportamiento de los influyentes y los seguidores. Los resultados confirman la conjetura propuesta.

Suggested Citation

  • Emiliano Giupponi, 2022. "Influenciadores y su importancia para la adopción de bitcoin," Asociación Argentina de Economía Política: Working Papers 4567, Asociación Argentina de Economía Política.
    • Handle: RePEc:aep:anales:4567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://aaep.org.ar/works/works2022/4567.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Knapp, Georg Friedrich, 1924. "The State Theory of Money," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number knapp1924.
    2. David Yermack, 2013. "Is Bitcoin a Real Currency? An economic appraisal," NBER Working Papers 19747, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Menger, Carl, 1892. "On the Origins of Money," History of Economic Thought Articles, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, vol. 2, pages 239-255.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mr. Michael Kumhof & Mr. Jaromir Benes, 2012. "The Chicago Plan Revisited," IMF Working Papers 2012/202, International Monetary Fund.
    2. Alexander W. Salter & William J. Luther, 2014. "Synthesizing State and Spontaneous Order Theories of Money," Advances in Austrian Economics, in: Entangled Political Economy, volume 18, pages 161-178, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    3. Sheila Dow, 2019. "Monetary Reform, Central Banks, and Digital Currencies," International Journal of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 153-173, April.
    4. Pradeep Dubey & Siddhartha Sahi & Martin Shubik, 2014. "Minimally Complex Exchange Mechanisms: Emergence of Prices, Markets, and Money," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1945, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    5. Sieroń, Arkadiusz, 2019. "Endogenous versus exogenous money: Does the debate really matter?," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(4), pages 329-338.
    6. David Orrell, 2016. "A Quantum Theory of Money and Value," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 5(2), pages 19-28, September.
    7. Thomas I. Palley, 2008. "Endogenous Money: Implications for the Money Supply Process, Interest Rates, and Macroeconomics," Working Papers wp178, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    8. Robert Gk{e}barowski & Stanis{l}aw Dro.zd.z & Andrzej Z. G'orski & Pawe{l} O'swik{e}cimka, 2014. "Competition of Commodities for the Status of Money in an Agent-based Model," Papers 1412.2124, arXiv.org.
    9. Christie Smith & Aaron Kumar, 2018. "Crypto‐Currencies – An Introduction To Not‐So‐Funny Moneys," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(5), pages 1531-1559, December.
    10. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/4vc7skecu3q7u7s984pi2eaan is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Bildirici, Melike E. & Sonustun, Bahri, 2021. "Chaotic behavior in gold, silver, copper and bitcoin prices," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    12. Lai T. Hoang & Dirk G. Baur, 2020. "Forecasting bitcoin volatility: Evidence from the options market," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(10), pages 1584-1602, October.
    13. Guidorzzi Girotto, Vitor & Strachman, Eduardo, 2024. "The Contributions of Knapp and Innes to the Chartalist Theory of Money," MPRA Paper 119866, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Hanna Halaburda & Guillaume Haeringer & Joshua Gans & Neil Gandal, 2022. "The Microeconomics of Cryptocurrencies," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 60(3), pages 971-1013, September.
    15. White, Reilly & Marinakis, Yorgos & Islam, Nazrul & Walsh, Steven, 2020. "Is Bitcoin a currency, a technology-based product, or something else?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    16. Chikako Nakayama, 2021. "Longing for Haute Finance in the 21st Century? A Neo-Polanyian Approach to the Theory of Money in the Digital Age," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(4), pages 1-1, November.
    17. Bouri, Elie & Molnár, Peter & Azzi, Georges & Roubaud, David & Hagfors, Lars Ivar, 2017. "On the hedge and safe haven properties of Bitcoin: Is it really more than a diversifier?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 192-198.
    18. Alessandra Cretarola & Gianna Fig`a-Talamanca & Marco Patacca, 2017. "A sentiment-based model for the BitCoin: theory, estimation and option pricing," Papers 1709.08621, arXiv.org.
    19. Salisu, Afees A. & Ogbonna, Ahamuefula E., 2022. "The return volatility of cryptocurrencies during the COVID-19 pandemic: Assessing the news effect," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    20. Fantazzini, Dean & Nigmatullin, Erik & Sukhanovskaya, Vera & Ivliev, Sergey, 2016. "Everything you always wanted to know about bitcoin modelling but were afraid to ask. I," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 44, pages 5-24.
    21. Ács, Attila, 2014. "Pénzintézeti mérlegadatok monetáris politikai újraértelmezése. A brókerkereskedő szervezetek reálgazdasági és likviditási jelentősége [Reconsidering the role of financial institutions balance sheet," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 166-192.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • E40 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Money and Interest Rates - - - General
    • E42 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Money and Interest Rates - - - Monetary Sytsems; Standards; Regimes; Government and the Monetary System

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aep:anales:4567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Juan Manuel Quintero (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeppea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.