IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/adl/wpaper/2005-08.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Knight versus Herskovits: A Methodologically Charged Debate in the 1940s

Author

Listed:
  • Eran Binenbaum

    (School of Economics, University of Adelaide)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Eran Binenbaum, 2005. "Knight versus Herskovits: A Methodologically Charged Debate in the 1940s," School of Economics and Public Policy Working Papers 2005-08, University of Adelaide, School of Economics and Public Policy.
    • Handle: RePEc:adl:wpaper:2005-08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://media.adelaide.edu.au/economics/papers/doc/wp2005-08.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Hamilton, 1991. "The Meaning of Anthropology for Economic Science: A Case for Intellectual Reciprocity," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 937-949, December.
    2. Boland, Lawrence A, 1981. "On the Futility of Criticizing the Neoclassical Maximization Hypothesis," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 71(5), pages 1031-1036, December.
    3. Frank H. Knight, 1941. "Anthropology and Economics," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 49(2), pages 247-247.
    4. Melville J. Herskovits, 1941. "Economics and Anthropology: A Rejoinder," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 49(2), pages 269-269.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dimand, Robert W. & Saffu, Kojo, 2021. "Polly Hill: Crossing And Contesting The Boundaries Of Anthropology, Economics, African Studies, And Entrepreneurship Studies," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(2), pages 279-296, June.
    2. Jérôme Ballet, 2018. "Anthropology and Economics: The Argument for a Microeconomic Anthropology," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2018-14, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    3. Schnellenbach, Jan & Schubert, Christian, 2015. "Behavioral political economy: A survey," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 40(PB), pages 395-417.
    4. Clark, Stephen A., 1995. "Indecisive choice theory," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 155-170, October.
    5. Ole Røgeberg & Morten Nordberg, 2005. "A defence of absurd theories in economics," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 543-562.
    6. Gerald T. Healy III & Jing Ru Tan & Peter F. Orazem, 2020. "Measuring Market Power in Professional Baseball, Basketball, Football, and Hockey," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 65(2), pages 214-231, October.
    7. Amitava Krishna Dutt & Peter Skott, 2006. "Keynesian Theory and the AD-AS Framework: A Reconsideration," Contributions to Economic Analysis, in: Quantitative and Empirical Analysis of Nonlinear Dynamic Macromodels, pages 149-172, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    8. Pavel Pelikán, 2010. "The Government Economic Agenda in a Society of Unequally Rational Individuals," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 231-255, May.
    9. Olivier Mesly & David W. Shanafelt & Nicolas Huck, 2021. "Dysfunctional Markets: A Spray of Prey Perspective," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(3), pages 797-819, July.
    10. Pessali, Huascar & Berger, Bruno, 2010. "A teoria da perspectiva e as mudanças de preferência no mainstream: um prospecto lakatoseano [Prospect theory and preference change in the mainstream of economics: a Lakatosian prospect]," MPRA Paper 26104, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Wilfred Dolfsma, 2005. "Consumption in a vacuum," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 59-67, January.
    12. Brighton, Henry, 2020. "Statistical foundations of ecological rationality," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 14, pages 1-32.
    13. Niccolo Caldararo, 2009. "Primitive and Modern Economics: Derivatives, Liquidity, Value, Panic and Crises, A Uniformitarian View," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 31-51, January.
    14. Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, 2010. "Axiomatic Basics of e-Economics," MPRA Paper 24331, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Lawrence A. Boland & Irene M. Gordon, 1992. "Criticizing positive accounting theory," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages 142-170, September.
    16. Thanos Skouras & Yiannis Kitromilides, 2014. "The irresistible charm of the micro-foundations dogma or the overwhelming force of the discipline's hard core?," European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 11(1), pages 67-79, April.
    17. Mikko Ketokivi & Joseph T. Mahoney, 2020. "Transaction Cost Economics As a Theory of Supply Chain Efficiency," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(4), pages 1011-1031, April.
    18. Mariano Rojas, 2012. "Do People in Income Poverty Use Their Income Efficiently?: a Subjective Well-Being Approach," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2012-110, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    19. Li, Cheng, 2014. "Rationality and Beyond: A Critique of the Nature and Task of Economics," MPRA Paper 56651, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Irene van Staveren, 2012. "An Evolutionary Efficiency Alternative to the Notion of Pareto Efficiency," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 1(1), pages 1-6, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adl:wpaper:2005-08. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Qazi Haque (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/decadau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.