IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/zbw/ofel18/180009.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

How Might Changes in Legislation Impact the Development of Entrepreneurship?

In: 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disruptive Change. April 13th - 14th, 2018, Dubrovnik, Croatia

Author

Listed:
  • Kunsek, Mojca
  • Djokic, Danila

Abstract

In the Action Plan for Entrepreneurship 2020, the fundamental purpose of the European Commission is to revive the entrepreneurial spirit in Europe after the economic crisis from the past years. At the same time, the European Commission strives to take an action in various areas of approach and implementation of entrepreneurial activity as the main lever for the growth of economic development and raising the level of employment. In recent years, the Slovenian turbulent economy has caused different ways of the entrepreneurship development. Beside the wellknown hypothesis that #of newly established companies shows the entrepreneurship development and their influence to the national GDP, the results of slovene promotors of entrepreneurship and specially the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) shows different results which can serve as a basis for the adoption appropriate government policies for future entrepreneurship development and economic growth. Slovenia moved from a socialist economy to a trade economy, with its independence in 1991. The First Companies Act (ZGD) was adopted in 1993 and laid down the foundations for entrepreneurial behavior. This was followed by other bases, such as the Enterprise Supporting Environment Act, aiming to increase the chances of setting up new businesses and creating new jobs and to establish an effective support system for entrepreneurs at all stages of their development. Pursuant to the Act on the Court Register and the Business Register of Slovenia Act, Slovenia offers free and easy entry to entrepreneurship through the one stop shop points system (VEM), where the prospective entrepreneur can register his / her business. For the VEM system, which has been operating since 2005, the Republic of Slovenia received the 2009 United Nations Public Service Award. According the Slovenian Enterprise Fund and other national providers of registering and assistance in starting up entrepreneurship, the most common mistakes of failed start-ups are excessive entrepreneurial optimism and unrealistic entrepreneurial plan, lack of entrepreneurial knowledge, poor knowledge of regulations and financial obligations and lack of capital which were expected. However according to the results of GEM Slovenia 2015, among the reasons for the termination of entrepreneurs' business, far more than in other EU economies, reflection of the company's unreliability and financial options are recognised, and less than in other EU economies, reflection of Creating qualitative entrepreneurial ecosystem is a mix of different government / tax policies. factors, which consists of government policies and programs for entrepreneurship, education and training, access to business and professional infrastructure, and also cultural and social norms. According to the results of the GEM 2015, despite expected lack of entrepreneurship financing, Slovenia surprisingly is under the European average at the level of entrepreneurial education and the social acceptance of entrepreneurship. On the basis of the cultural and sociological background of this challenge, however, the foundations of a different behavior and a greater acceptance of entrepreneurship will undoubtedly be conditioned by appropriate legal bases and promotional activities, where have already been seen certain activities for more positive attitude towards qualitative entrepreneurship.

Suggested Citation

  • Kunsek, Mojca & Djokic, Danila, 2018. "How Might Changes in Legislation Impact the Development of Entrepreneurship?," 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disruptive Change (Dubrovnik, 2018), in: 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disrupt, pages 475-490, Governance Research and Development Centre (CIRU), Zagreb.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ofel18:180009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/180009/1/ofel-2018-p475-490.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank Group, 2016. "Doing Business 2016," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 22771.
    2. Aleksander Aristovnik & Alka Obadic, 2015. "The impact and efficiency of public administration excellence on fostering SMEs in EU countries," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(39), pages 761-761, May.
    3. Howard H. Stevenson & J. Carlos Jarillo, 2007. "A Paradigm of Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Management," Springer Books, in: Álvaro Cuervo & Domingo Ribeiro & Salvador Roig (ed.), Entrepreneurship, pages 155-170, Springer.
    4. Nick Malyshev, 2006. "Regulatory Policy: OECD Experience and Evidence," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 22(2), pages 274-299, Summer.
    5. Dieter Helm, 2006. "Regulatory Reform, Capture, and the Regulatory Burden," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 22(2), pages 169-185, Summer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shaun Elder, 2014. "Does the GFC as a change agent of financial regulatory models and approaches in Europe provide lessons for Asia?," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 419-430, December.
    2. He Wei Ping, 2013. "Regulatory capture in China's banking sector," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(1), pages 80-90, January.
    3. Andr�s J. Drew, 2010. "New rules, new politics, same actors � explaining policy change in the EU ETS," GRI Working Papers 29, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    4. Federica Daniele & Alessandra Pasquini & Stefano Clò & Enza Maltese, 2022. "Unburdening regulation: the impact of regulatory simplification on photovoltaic adoption in Italy," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1387, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    5. Marc Dressler, 2023. "Generic strategic profiling of entrepreneurial SMEs – environmentalism as hygiene factor," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 121-150, March.
    6. Andrews, Matthew, 2008. "Are One-Best-Way Models of Effective Government Suitable for Developing Countries?," Working Paper Series rwp08-014, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    7. Ralph Chami & Connel Fullenkamp & Sunil Sharma, 2010. "A framework for financial market development," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 107-135.
    8. Tali Hadasa Blank & Abraham Carmeli, 2021. "Does founding team composition influence external investment? The role of founding team prior experience and founder CEO," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 1869-1888, December.
    9. Eunju Jung & Yongjin Lee, 2020. "College Students’ Entrepreneurial Mindset: Educational Experiences Override Gender and Major," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-28, October.
    10. Aad Correljé & Martijn Groenleer & Jasper Veldman, 2013. "Understanding institutional change: the development of institutions for the regulation of natural gas transportation systems in the US and the EU," RSCAS Working Papers 2013/07, European University Institute.
    11. Patrick Ene Okon, 2018. "Comparative Analysis of Mass Media Coverage of the Fight Against Corruption in Nigeria by the Obasanjo and Buhari Administrations," International Journal of Emerging Trends in Social Sciences, Scientific Publishing Institute, vol. 4(2), pages 47-57.
    12. Ignatov Augustin, 2019. "Entrepreneurship and Bureaucracy: Impact upon Innovation and Economic Competitiveness of the European Union," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 22(72), pages 36-59, June.
    13. JinHyo Joseph Yun & Xiaofei Zhao & KwangHo Jung & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2020. "The Culture for Open Innovation Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    14. Brownell, Katrina M. & McMullen, Jeffery S. & O'Boyle, Ernest H., 2021. "Fatal attraction: A systematic review and research agenda of the dark triad in entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(3).
    15. Manuel Fernandez & Robinson Joseph, 2016. "Qatar Emerging as the Most Attractive FDI Destination in the GCC," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(11), pages 175-192, November.
    16. Daniele, Federica & Pasquini, Alessandra & Clò, Stefano & Maltese, Enza, 2023. "Unburdening regulation: The impact of regulatory simplification on photovoltaic adoption in Italy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    17. Colin Donaldson, 2019. "Intentions resurrected: a systematic review of entrepreneurial intention research from 2014 to 2018 and future research agenda," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 953-975, September.
    18. Carol A. Heimer & Elsinore Kuo, 2021. "Subterranean successes: Durable regulation and regulatory endowments," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(S1), pages 63-82, November.
    19. Jaroslav BELAS & Lubomir BELAS & Martin CEPEL & Zoltan ROZSA, 2019. "The Impact Of The Public Sector On The Quality Of The Business Environment In The Sme Segment," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2019(32), pages 18-31, June.
    20. Greenwood, Dan & Congreve, Alina & King, Martin, 2017. "Streamlining or watering down? Assessing the 'smartness' of policy and standards for the promotion of low and zero carbon homes in England 2010–15," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 490-499.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ofel18:180009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ciru.hr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.