IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-030-86897-0_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Context of Public Policy on the Sharing Economy

In: The Sharing Economy in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Błażej Koczetkow

    (SGH Warsaw School of Economics)

  • Andrzej Klimczuk

    (SGH Warsaw School of Economics)

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to analyse approaches to the sharing economy from the perspective of public policy science. In the first part of the text, attentionattention economy is paid to perceiving the development of the emerging sharing economy not only as phenomenon with positive economic effects but also as a set of public problems (e.g., on the labour market and for existing economic structures) that require intervention at the level of national governments as well as at international level. Subsequent sections identify possible actions for regulating the development of the sharing economy. The role of soft law, stakeholders’ networks, self-regulation and standardisation are discussed in the chapter. The summary includes potential directions for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Błażej Koczetkow & Andrzej Klimczuk, 2022. "The Context of Public Policy on the Sharing Economy," Springer Books, in: Vida Česnuitytė & Andrzej Klimczuk & Cristina Miguel & Gabriela Avram (ed.), The Sharing Economy in Europe, chapter 0, pages 41-64, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-86897-0_3
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-86897-0_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Klimczuk, Andrzej & Česnuityte, Vida & Avram, Gabriela, 2021. "The Collaborative Economy in Action: European Perspectives," MPRA Paper 110082, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Klimczuk, Andrzej & Česnuitytė, Vida & Avram, Gabriela (ed.), 2021. "The Collaborative Economy in Action: European Perspectives," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 243096, December.
    3. Jakob Edler & Paul Cunningham & Abdullah Gök & Philip Shapira (ed.), 2016. "Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 16121.
    4. Ruthanne Huising & Susan S. Silbey, 2011. "Governing the gap : Forging safe science through relational regulation," Post-Print hal-02311930, HAL.
    5. Surdej, Aleksander, 2014. "Regulacyjne instrumenty w polityce publicznej," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 1(4), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Dumančić, Kosjenka & Čeh Časni, Anita, 2021. "The State of the Sharing Economy in Croatia: Legal Framework and Impact on Various Economic Sectors," MPRA Paper 110230, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Česnuitytė, Vida & Klimczuk, Andrzej & Miguel, Cristina & Avram, Gabriela (ed.), 2022. "The Sharing Economy in Europe: Developments, Practices, and Contradictions," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 249157, December.
    2. Česnuitytė, Vida & Simonovits, Bori & Klimczuk, Andrzej & Balázs, Bálint & Miguel, Cristina & Avram, Gabriela, 2022. "The State and Critical Assessment of the Sharing Economy in Europe," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 387-403.
    3. Miguel, Cristina & Avram, Gabriela & Klimczuk, Andrzej & Simonovits, Bori & Balázs, Bálint & Česnuitytė, Vida, 2022. "The Sharing Economy in Europe: From Idea to Reality," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 3-18.
    4. Ruthanne Huising, 2014. "The Erosion of Expert Control Through Censure Episodes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1633-1661, December.
    5. Joanna Stryjek, 2021. "Counteracting the COVID-19 Crisis with Innovation Policy Tools: A Case Study of the EU’s Supranational Innovation Policy," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 450-468.
    6. Xiaoke Zhang, 2022. "Understanding innovation policy governance: A disaggregated approach," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(3), pages 303-329, May.
    7. Ricard Esparza-Masana, 2022. "Towards Smart Specialisation 2.0. Main Challenges When Updating Strategies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(1), pages 635-655, March.
    8. Liotard, Isabelle & Revest, Valérie, 2018. "Contests as innovation policy instruments: Lessons from the US federal agencies' experience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 57-69.
    9. Albert Bravo-Biosca, 2020. "Experimental Innovation Policy," Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 20(1), pages 191-232.
    10. Gokce Basbug & Ayn Cavicchi & Susan S. Silbey, 2023. "Rank Has Its Privileges: Explaining Why Laboratory Safety Is a Persistent Challenge," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(3), pages 571-587, May.
    11. Haico te Kulve & Wouter Boon & Kornelia Konrad & Tjerk Jan Schuitmaker, 2018. "Influencing the direction of innovation processes: the shadow of authorities in demand articulation," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(4), pages 455-467.
    12. Grashof, Nils, 2020. "Putting the watering can away Towards a targeted (problem-oriented) cluster policy framework," Papers in Innovation Studies 2020/4, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    13. Steven J. Kahl & Brayden G. King & Greg Liegel, 2016. "Occupational Survival Through Field-Level Task Integration: Systems Men, Production Planners, and the Computer, 1940s–1990s," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1084-1107, October.
    14. Knut Blind & Jakob Pohlisch & Anne Rainville, 2020. "Innovation and standardization as drivers of companies’ success in public procurement: an empirical analysis," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 664-693, June.
    15. Aalto, Eero & Gustafsson, Robin, 2020. "Innovation Promotion Rationales and Impacts – A Review," ETLA Reports 99, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    16. Daniel Catalá‐Pérez & María de‐Miguel‐Molina, 2021. "Analyzing Territorial and Sectorial Dimensions of Public–Private Partnerships in Science, Technology, and Innovation policies," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(1), pages 113-138, January.
    17. Ebru Kayaalp, 2012. "Torn in translation: An ethnographic study of regulatory decision‐making in Turkey," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(2), pages 225-241, June.
    18. Sofie Sandin, 2020. "Making Use of Evaluations to Support a Transition towards a More Sustainable Energy System and Society—An Assessment of Current and Potential Use among Swedish State Agencies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-26, October.
    19. Havas, Atttila & Weber, K. Matthias, 2017. "The role of foresight in shaping the next production revolution," MPRA Paper 100374, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Giliberto Capano & Michael Howlett, 2020. "The Knowns and Unknowns of Policy Instrument Analysis: Policy Tools and the Current Research Agenda on Policy Mixes," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440199, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Informal tools of regulation; Public policy instruments; Regulations and the sharing economy; Self-regulation in the sharing economy; Soft law; Standards in sharing economy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D16 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Collaborative Consumption
    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
    • Z18 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Public Policy
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-86897-0_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.