IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/spochp/978-0-387-73299-2_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Neuro-dynamic programming for fractionated radiotherapy planning

In: Optimization in Medicine

Author

Listed:
  • Geng Deng

    (University of Wisconsin at Madison)

  • Michael C. Ferris

    (University of Wisconsin at Madison)

Abstract

Summary We investigate an on-line planning strategy for the fractionated radiotherapy planning problem, which incorporates the effects of day-to-day patient motion. On-line planning demonstrates significant improvement over off-line strategies in terms of reducing registration error, but it requires extra work in the replanning procedures, such as in the CT scans and the re-computation of a deliverable dose profile. We formulate the problem in a dynamic programming framework and solve it based on the approximate policy iteration techniques of neuro-dynamic programming. In initial limited testing, the solutions we obtain outperform existing solutions and offer an improved dose profile for each fraction of the treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Geng Deng & Michael C. Ferris, 2008. "Neuro-dynamic programming for fractionated radiotherapy planning," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Carlos J. S. Alves & Panos M. Pardalos & Luis Nunes Vicente (ed.), Optimization in Medicine, pages 47-70, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:spochp:978-0-387-73299-2_3
    DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-73299-2_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chan, Timothy C.Y. & Mišić, Velibor V., 2013. "Adaptive and robust radiation therapy optimization for lung cancer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(3), pages 745-756.
    2. Thomas Bortfeld & Jagdish Ramakrishnan & John N. Tsitsiklis & Jan Unkelbach, 2015. "Optimization of Radiation Therapy Fractionation Schedules in the Presence of Tumor Repopulation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 788-803, November.
    3. Jalalimanesh, Ammar & Shahabi Haghighi, Hamidreza & Ahmadi, Abbas & Soltani, Madjid, 2017. "Simulation-based optimization of radiotherapy: Agent-based modeling and reinforcement learning," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 235-248.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:spochp:978-0-387-73299-2_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.