IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prbchp/978-3-031-31836-8_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Descending Beats Ascending: Effects of Order on the Likert Scale on Consumer Ratings

In: Advances in Digital Marketing and eCommerce

Author

Listed:
  • Takumi Kato

    (Meiji University)

Abstract

In marketing surveys, the question order bias and response order bias are known from the viewpoint of order, while the response scale bias and central tendency bias are known from the viewpoint of the Likert scale, and a large amount of literature exists to support this. However, there is no evidence of bias due to the ascending or descending order of the Likert scale. This study filled this gap. An online survey of loyalty at Japanese universities was collected from 338 individuals. The result showed that since respondents prefer the first option, the descending order with the highest score on the upper side obtained a higher score. When determining the loyalty indices on the Likert scale in measuring marketing effectiveness, the true effectiveness cannot be known unless the order of options is consistent. In addition, since less serious respondents prefer higher options, the ascending order should be adopted to improve the quality of answers with good scores. This makes it possible to improve the accuracy of identifying customers with high loyalty. Thus, ascending options in the loyalty index question eliminate spurious loyalty due to insincere answers. Research design that understands the mechanisms of bias and limits uncertainty is essential in both business and academic research. This study provides useful suggestions for effect measurement, which is indispensable in digital marketing.

Suggested Citation

  • Takumi Kato, 2023. "Descending Beats Ascending: Effects of Order on the Likert Scale on Consumer Ratings," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Francisco J. Martínez-López (ed.), Advances in Digital Marketing and eCommerce, pages 20-28, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-031-31836-8_3
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-31836-8_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-031-31836-8_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.