IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prbchp/978-3-030-95809-1_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

How Fair is the Handling of the Claimant Customer? A Comparison Between the e-mail and Telephone Channels

In: Brand, Label, and Product Intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Tahali

    (CEREFIGE, University of Lorraine)

  • Hélène Yildiz

    (MCF HDR, CEREFIGE, University of Lorraine)

Abstract

Context: Our study re-examines, in a comparative way, the impact of the reactivity on the satisfaction of the claiming customer from two channels: the email and the telephone. Method: Based on the foundations of the theory of justice, we analyze which of the two channels generates better responsiveness, better justice and ultimately greater satisfaction of the claimant customers. A logistic equation was constructed from 653 customer responses following the processing of their claim, which integrated the impact of responsiveness on the three levels of justice theory (procedural, distributive and interactional). Results: The results of this study underline a greater reactivity and a better satisfaction within the framework of the email channel compared to the telephone channel. The level of procedural fairness was found to be the most important for customers claiming via this channel. Conclusion: This study underlines, on the one hand, the importance of the reactivity of the email channel compared to the telephone in the management of complaints. On the other hand, it shows the impact of a smooth and clear process to satisfy the complaining customer and increase his perceived justice.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Tahali & Hélène Yildiz, 2022. "How Fair is the Handling of the Claimant Customer? A Comparison Between the e-mail and Telephone Channels," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Joseph Kaswengi & Aurore Ingarao (ed.), Brand, Label, and Product Intelligence, chapter 0, pages 129-141, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-030-95809-1_7
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-95809-1_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-030-95809-1_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.