IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/mgmchp/978-3-319-95273-4_16.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Digitalization in Public Services: Process Automation and Workforce Management at BruderhausDiakonie, a Social Services Organization

In: Digitalization Cases

Author

Listed:
  • Ulrich Müller

    (Operational Services GmbH & Co. KG)

  • Thomas Deelmann

    (FHöV NRW)

Abstract

(a) Situation faced: In Germany’s public sector, one of the main challenges is the demographic change and the resulting lack of skilled human resources. At the same time, digital solutions for e.g. citizens, businesses or other stakeholders move from “nice to have” towards “must have”. The automation of services seems to be a promising approach to combine these two developments. This paper features BruderhausDiakonie, a social services organization which is growing horizontally at many new locations in order to ensure closeness to its clients. This process leads to an increase in complexity for its daily business and necessitates a change in thinking regarding the organization’s IT towards increased digitalization. (b) Action taken: In 2016, BruderhausDiakonie initiated a change process. The central message, which guided the project team from the beginning, gets to the root of the problem regarding digital transformation: Standardization before digitalization. The first step of a thorough analysis is the identification of routine tasks. Additionally, the vision of no more “Turnschuh-IT-Administration” (eng: “IT department in sneakers”) was developed and communicated. An easy to use technology platform was implemented, mobile devices were integrated—and data security was given number one priority. (c) Results achieved: The digitalization process of BruderhausDiakonie is not yet finished. However, first results are already visible. In August 2017, five pilot offices were reorganized towards the new model. Until 2020, the process is to be finished for all offices. The first effects are already observable, along with the feedback of the involved employees. After all, the tangible benefits of digital transformation take a certain amount of time to become clear to employees. The IT department can help to start a new process, but everyone can and should be actively involved. The employees working in care or other departments feel the change happening, which is indicative of how their daily work is going to be in the future. Their work becomes more convenient, more comfortable and less time-consuming in regard to purely administrative tasks. Additionally, BruderhausDiakonie is also taking a pioneering position in how they will implement the benefits of the Internet of Things (IoT) as quickly as possible in their offices. In the future, employees should not only be provided with mobile devices, but also intelligent working materials, which not only make their work with clients easier, but diagnosis and care as well. (d) Lessons learned: Digital transformation is a challenge, but it is feasible. It is important to choose an IT which allows for a gradual development towards the digital age. Knee-jerk solutions seem to be counterproductive. More promising is a step-by-step change process in regard to digital transformation, because it allows all involved parties a smooth adjustment to the digital requirements of the future. Three lessons learned stand out: (i) digital transformation is more complex than expected; (ii) all employees need to be involved and creating acceptance is a continuous task; (iii) one has to carry on and not to stop after the first successes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulrich Müller & Thomas Deelmann, 2019. "Digitalization in Public Services: Process Automation and Workforce Management at BruderhausDiakonie, a Social Services Organization," Management for Professionals, in: Nils Urbach & Maximilian Röglinger (ed.), Digitalization Cases, pages 313-327, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:mgmchp:978-3-319-95273-4_16
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-95273-4_16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:mgmchp:978-3-319-95273-4_16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.