IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/kmochp/978-3-031-38696-1_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Approaching the Complexity of Knowledge Management

In: The Future of Knowledge Management

Author

Listed:
  • Constantin Bratianu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies
    Academy of Romanian Scientists)

Abstract

Knowledge management is an intrinsic part of the managerial process and not a substitute for it. It is that part that is focused on managing intangible resources like knowledge, ideas, brands, and many other similar entities. Although this assertion is clear and looks like an extension of classical management, many knowledge management projects failed and generated a question mark about the future of knowledge management. Management developed based on the basic ideas coming from engineering and on the paradigm of measuring. The assertion “What gets measured gets managed” became almost a norm in management thinking. But knowledge is intangible and contextual. Measuring knowledge is almost impossible by using the measuring systems designed for tangible objects, and that is a huge barrier to understanding and practicing knowledge management. There is a need to change the management paradigm to accommodate intangible resources, and that means approaching the complexity of knowledge and knowledge management. The purpose of this chapter is to reveal some of the most important barriers between classical management and knowledge management and how we can find ways to overcome them, that is, to identify some new models for explaining the complexity of knowledge, knowledge dynamics, and knowledge management concepts. That means revealing new metaphors for understanding the multidimensional concept of knowledge and how to interpret its dynamics at the individual, team, and organizational levels. The chapter focuses on the theory of knowledge fields and knowledge dynamics from a thermodynamics perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Constantin Bratianu, 2023. "Approaching the Complexity of Knowledge Management," Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, in: Constantin Bratianu & Meliha Handzic & Ettore Bolisani (ed.), The Future of Knowledge Management, pages 3-22, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:kmochp:978-3-031-38696-1_1
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-38696-1_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:kmochp:978-3-031-38696-1_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.