IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/isochp/978-1-4614-5885-2_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Operating Room Planning and Scheduling

In: Handbook of Healthcare Operations Management

Author

Listed:
  • Erik Demeulemeester

    (Research Center for Operations Management, KU Leuven)

  • Jeroen Beliën

    (Research Center for Operations Management, KU Leuven
    Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Center for Informatics, Modeling and Simulation)

  • Brecht Cardoen

    (Research Center for Operations Management, KU Leuven
    Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School, Operations and Technology Management Center)

  • Michael Samudra

    (Research Center for Operations Management, KU Leuven)

Abstract

Operating room (OR) planning and scheduling decisions involve the coordination of patients, medical staff, and hospital facilities. The patients arriving to the hospital are assigned to a surgery date and a surgery time slot. At the time of surgery, a suitable OR, the attending surgeon, supporting anesthesiologists, nurses, and, after the surgery, rooms in secondary facilities such as post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), intensive care unit (ICU), and ward need to be available. In order to deal with the complexity and the variety of problems faced in OR scheduling, it is useful to involve methods from operations research. In this chapter, we review the recent literature on the application of operations research to OR planning and scheduling. We start by discussing the impact of planning and scheduling of the ORs on the overall performance of a hospital. Next, we discuss the criteria for included publications and summarize the structure of Cardoen et al. (Eur J Oper Res 201:921–932, 2010) that served as the guideline for organization of this chapter. In the remainder of the chapter, we describe the evolution of the literature over the last 10 years with regard to the patient type, the different performance measures, the decision that has to be made, the incorporation of uncertainty, the operations research methodology, and the applicability of the research. Moreover, each of these evolutions will be demonstrated with a short review of some relevant papers. This chapter ends with conclusions and a discussion of interesting topics for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Erik Demeulemeester & Jeroen Beliën & Brecht Cardoen & Michael Samudra, 2013. "Operating Room Planning and Scheduling," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Brian T. Denton (ed.), Handbook of Healthcare Operations Management, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 121-152, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-1-4614-5885-2_5
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5885-2_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Asli Ozen & Yariv Marmor & Thomas Rohleder & Hari Balasubramanian & Jeanne Huddleston & Paul Huddleston, 2016. "Optimization and Simulation of Orthopedic Spine Surgery Cases at Mayo Clinic," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 157-175, February.
    2. Siqueira, Cecília L. & Arruda, Edilson F. & Bahiense, Laura & Bahr, Germana L. & Motta, Geraldo R., 2018. "Long-term integrated surgery room optimization and recovery ward planning, with a case study in the Brazilian National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics (INTO)," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 870-883.
    3. Grigory Korzhenevich & Anne Zander, 2024. "Leveraging the potential of the German operating room benchmarking initiative for planning: A ready-to-use surgical process data set," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 328-351, September.
    4. Jin Qi, 2017. "Mitigating Delays and Unfairness in Appointment Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(2), pages 566-583, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-1-4614-5885-2_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.