IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/csrchp/978-3-662-44997-4_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Discussion of Findings

In: Chinese Strategic Decision-making on CSR

Author

Listed:
  • Shuo Wang

    (School of Wuhan University
    China Huarong Asset Management, CO., LTD.)

Abstract

In this thesis, a conceptual framework is developed with two research aims: to examine the impact of stakeholder claims on managers’ CSR-related SDM concerning charitable donations, and to explore the role of organisational settings on the characteristics of decision-makers in CSR-related SDM. This study applies “an integrated model of strategic decision-making process” (see Sect. 5.4 ) into the CSR issues while developing the research model (see Sect. 5.5 ). According to the research findings, nine main hypotheses and including two sub-hypotheses are supported. However, five main hypotheses and including three sub-hypotheses are rejected. From the within-subjects and between-subjects perspective, this chapter explains the findings and compares them with previous research studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuo Wang, 2015. "Discussion of Findings," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Chinese Strategic Decision-making on CSR, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 95-109, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-662-44997-4_6
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-44997-4_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-662-44997-4_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.