IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/csrchp/978-3-030-11217-2_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

“Soft Regulating” Social and Sustainability Reporting on the Web: The Case of Italy

In: Responsible Business in Uncertain Times and for a Sustainable Future

Author

Listed:
  • Del Baldo Mara

    (University of Urbino Carlo Bo)

Abstract

Standard-setting practices help to create essential voluntary agreements that support the dissemination of knowledge, best practices and monitoring tools. Many national, regional and global actors have asked for more education in standardization. Acknowledging that sustainable development needs common agreements mean that standards are being used to support sustainability purposes. Drawing from these premises, the chapter is aimed to analyse and discuss the rationale, content and benefits of the Italian GBS (Study Group for establishing the Social Reporting Standards) Guidance on social reporting on the web named The new frontiers of social reporting: Web Reporting Guidelines—Research Document. Over the years, the GBS has released several research documents that consist of “soft regulation” tools aimed to standardise and improve social and environmental reporting in Italy (GBS Standards and Guidelines). After having introduced the theoretical framework on existing standard on web reporting the work is empirically based and founded on an interventionist research project and an action research approach. Indeed, it describes and analyses the experience of the GBS working group to release the guidance, based on the observation of existing practices and highlighting how organisations can: articulate the web reporting content through a check list; ensure legibility of content, while respecting web usability criteria; develop content profiling by stakeholder categories and interactivity tools to enhance stakeholders dialogue; ensure content reliability and timely information. Findings point out that the web and social networks have profoundly changed the ways organisations adopt in reporting, communicating and managing relationships with their stakeholders and have opened new scenarios in the accountability processes. The web-based reporting experiences at the national level, however, outline an uneven and fragmented picture that, in the absence of clear indications and shared references, may limit the reporting scope or fail to develop the potential of web social and sustainability reporting.

Suggested Citation

  • Del Baldo Mara, 2019. "“Soft Regulating” Social and Sustainability Reporting on the Web: The Case of Italy," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Nicholas Capaldi & Samuel O. Idowu & René Schmidpeter & Martin Brueckner (ed.), Responsible Business in Uncertain Times and for a Sustainable Future, pages 107-127, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-030-11217-2_5
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-11217-2_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elhassan Kotb Abdelrahman Radwan & Antonella Russo, 2024. "Web‐based corporate social responsibility disclosure practices: A systematic literature review and research directions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 5049-5106, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-030-11217-2_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.