IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/sau/ueedcc/06007-023.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Existing Metrics Use in Indexing ICT Integration in University Teaching

In: Universities, Entrepreneurship and Enterprise Development in Africa - Conference Proceedings 2017

Author

Listed:
  • James Onyango Abila
  • Wamocho Leonard
  • Anselemo Peters Ikoha

Abstract

ICT integration by universities teaching professionals is emerging as a major concern, this study demonstrate the need to address the integration problem by encouraging existing metrics use in indexing ICT integration as an ICT governance strategy. Quality of integration depends on quality indexing which also depend on quality of existing metrics and their use. Considering the role that University Information Technology Teaching Professionals’ (UITTPs) continuous improvement indexing can offer, towards autonomic governance of the continuous emerging ICTs in the university teaching, this study examined extent in use of existing ICT integration metrics to index ICT integration by the UITTPs. Six metrics for ICT integration were investigated; time, workshop course content relevance, technical malfunctions, support conditions, support services, and motivation and commitment to student learning and staff professional development metrics. Descriptive survey design was used in which interviews were conducted to UITTPs in three (3) public and three (3) private purposively selected universities in Kenya. The findings were analyzed descriptively and inferentially using Kendall’s correlation of concordance and tested using Chi-square on the extent of concordance and presented with help of frequency tables, figures and percentages. The findings revealed that all the metrics are rarely used for indexing ICT integration (32.8%), and most UITTPs were in discordance on this level of all the six metrics use except for support condition. This implied that the use of metrics for indexing integration has not been formalized across the Kenyan universities. Universities need to be encouraged to identify suitable metrics, formalize them and improve their frequency in use. Secondly, socio based metrics such as content relevance are used more frequently for indexing integration as compared to Technical metrics, socio-technical metrics balance therefore need to be emphasized by the universities management when determining and using metrics for indexing ICT integration. Published In: Munyoki, Bode (Eds.): Universities, Entrepreneurship and Enterprise Development in Africa - Conference Proceedings 2017. Nairobi, Kenya, 19. July 2017

Suggested Citation

  • James Onyango Abila & Wamocho Leonard & Anselemo Peters Ikoha, 2017. "Existing Metrics Use in Indexing ICT Integration in University Teaching," Proceedings Paper, in: Munyoki, Justus & Bode, Jürgen (ed.), Universities, Entrepreneurship and Enterprise Development in Africa - Conference Proceedings 2017, volume 6, pages 7-23, Universities Entrepreneurship and Enterprise Development in Africa International Conference.
    • Handle: RePEc:sau:ueedcc:06:007-023
    DOI: 10.18418/978-3-96043-060-5_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pub.h-brs.de/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/3415/file/GAUP_Conference_Proceedings_2017_7.pdf
    File Function: Download
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18418/978-3-96043-060-5_7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael R. Wagner & Zinovy Radovilsky, 2012. "Optimizing Boat Resources at the U.S. Coast Guard: Deterministic and Stochastic Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1035-1049, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul A. Chircop & Timothy J. Surendonk & Menkes H. L. van den Briel & Toby Walsh, 2022. "On routing and scheduling a fleet of resource-constrained vessels to provide ongoing continuous patrol coverage," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 723-760, May.
    2. Bo Li & Antonio Arreola‐Risa, 2022. "Minimizing conditional value‐at‐risk under a modified basestock policy," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1822-1838, April.
    3. Karatas, Mumtaz, 2021. "A dynamic multi-objective location-allocation model for search and rescue assets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 620-633.
    4. Ioannis Fragkos & Bert De Reyck, 2016. "Improving the Maritime Transshipment Operations of the Noble Group," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 203-217, April.
    5. Bo Li & Antonio Arreola‐Risa, 2021. "On minimizing downside risk in make‐to‐stock, risk‐averse firms," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 68(2), pages 199-213, March.
    6. Wei Wang & Li Huang & Xuedong Liang, 2018. "On the Simulation-Based Reliability of Complex Emergency Logistics Networks in Post-Accident Rescues," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, January.
    7. Mumtaz Karatas & Nasuh Razi & Murat M. Gunal, 2017. "An ILP and simulation model to optimize search and rescue helicopter operations," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(11), pages 1335-1351, November.
    8. Günay Uzun & Metin Dağdeviren & Mehmet Kabak, 2016. "Determining the Distribution of Coast Guard Vessels," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 46(4), pages 297-314, August.
    9. Amin Akbari & Ronald Pelot & H. A. Eiselt, 2018. "A modular capacitated multi-objective model for locating maritime search and rescue vessels," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 267(1), pages 3-28, August.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sau:ueedcc:06:007-023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.