IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-1-349-21935-3_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A Question of Relevance: The General Theory in Keynes’s Time and Ours

In: On Money, Method and Keynes

Author

Listed:
  • Victoria Chick

    (University College London)

Abstract

Nothing could stand as a better monument to Keynes, whose centenary this issue of The South African Journal of Economics is celebrating, than the fact that people are still arguing about his work: arguing not only for the sake of setting the record straight but also to understand what his work has to tell us about our present-day world. The General Theory (Keynes, 1936) is the focus of most of this discussion, and for good reason: despite the enormous volume of work which has been done since under the name of ‘macroeconomics’, the General Theory still stands as the major work in which macroeconomic questions — the theory of output-as-a-whole and of aggregate employment — have all been dealt with in a coherent manner. It is a theory whose parts fit together. Later ‘macro-theorists’ have tinkered with the parts and never put the pieces back together again to create something new. So we find, somewhat surprisingly, that after half a century the General Theory is still the best macroeconomics we have.

Suggested Citation

  • Victoria Chick, 1992. "A Question of Relevance: The General Theory in Keynes’s Time and Ours," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Philip Arestis & Sheila C. Dow (ed.), On Money, Method and Keynes, chapter 1, pages 1-29, Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-21935-3_1
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-21935-3_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Victoria Chick, 1983. "Macroeconomics after Keynes: A Reconsideration of the General Theory," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262530457, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Toshio Watanabe, 2020. "Financial Instability and Effects of Monetary Policy," Bulletin of Political Economy, Bulletin of Political Economy, vol. 14(1), pages 117-145, June.
    2. Jochen Hartwig, 2006. "Explaining the aggregate price level with Keynes's principle of effective demand," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 64(4), pages 469-492.
    3. Stephanie Bell, 1999. "Functional Finance: What, Why, and How?," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_287, Levy Economics Institute.
    4. Jesper Jespersen, 2012. "Keynes’s General Theory after 75 years: time to re-read and reflect," Chapters, in: Jesper Jespersen & Mogens Ove Madsen (ed.), Keynes’s General Theory for Today, chapter 8, pages 131-150, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Nicola Meccheri, 2007. "Wage behaviour and unemployment in Keynes' and New Keynesians' views: A comparison," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 701-724.
    6. Earl, Peter E., 2015. "Anchoring in economics: On Frey and Gallus on the aggregation of behavioural anomalies," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 9, pages 1-25.
    7. Jespersen Jesper, 2000. "Some Aspects of J. M. Keynes's Theoretical Contributions to the Economic Debate of the 1920's'," Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte / Economic History Yearbook, De Gruyter, vol. 41(1), pages 219-224, June.
    8. Klausinger, Hansjörg, 2000. "Walras' law and the IS-LM model. A tale of progress and regress," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 69, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    9. Heller, Claudia, 2009. "Keynes’s slip of the pen: aggregate supply curve vs employment function," MPRA Paper 12837, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. James C. W. Ahiakpor, 1997. "Full Employment: A Classical Assumption or Keynes's Rhetorical Device?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(1), pages 56-74, July.
    11. Sheila C. Dow, 1986. "Post Keynesian Monetary Theory for an Open Economy," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 237-257, December.
    12. Gianfranco Giulioni & Marcello Silvestri & Edgardo Bucciarelli, 2017. "Firms’ Finance in an Experimentally Microfounded Agent-Based Macroeconomic Model," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(2), pages 259-320, May.
    13. Paul Dalziel, 1996. "The Keynesian Multiplier, Liquidity Preference, and Endogenous Money," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 311-331, March.
    14. Victoria Chick, 1997. "Some Reflections on Financial Fragility in Banking and Finance," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 535-542, June.
    15. Angel Asensio, 2009. "Bad money and distributive conflict," Working Papers halshs-00496919, HAL.
    16. Marco A. Crocco, 2008. "Technical Change And Formation Of Expectations," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 276-304, May.
    17. David Laidler, 2002. "Skidelsky's Keynes: a review essay," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 97-110.
    18. Jorg Bibow, 2019. "Evolving International Monetary and Financial Architecture and the Development Challenge: A Liquidity Preference Theoretical Perspective," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_935, Levy Economics Institute.
    19. Robert E. Prasch, 2002. "What Is Wrong with Wage Subsidies?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 357-364, June.
    20. Bill Gibson & Mark Setterfield, 2018. "Intermediation, Money Creation, and Keynesian Macrodynamics in Multi-agent Systems," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 154-171, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-21935-3_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.