IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/ito/pchaps/159114.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Decision-making in Risk Management

In: Perspectives on Risk, Assessment and Management Paradigms

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Folkmann Wright

Abstract

The definition of risk introduced in the ISO 31000 standard of 2009 (2018) is uncertain goal achievement; thus, both negative and positive outcomes can be considered. It also implies that risk is not limited to life and health, but may cover all goals of a company. Risk management thus becomes a question of achieving and optimizing multiple goals. Since safety is but one of several considerations, safety may lose out to other more easily measured objectives of a company, such as economics and compliance with regulatory requirements. Risk analyses have a long history of quantification, a tradition that for various reasons has waned and should be revived if safety goals are to be treated together with other goals of a company. The extended scope affects not only company owners and employees but also neighbors, the local community, and the society at large. The stochastic nature of risk and the considerable time lap between decisions and the multiattributed consequences implies that managing risk is exposed to cognitive biases of many sorts. Risk management should be based on a quantitative approach to risk analysis as a protection against the many cognitive biases likely to be present, and managers should be trained to recognize the most common cognitive biases and decision pitfalls.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Folkmann Wright, 2019. "Decision-making in Risk Management," Chapters, in: Ali G. Hessami (ed.), Perspectives on Risk, Assessment and Management Paradigms, IntechOpen.
  • Handle: RePEc:ito:pchaps:159114
    DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.80439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/63163
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5772/intechopen.80439?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5246 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Roschk, Holger & Müller, Jana & Gelbrich, Katja, 2013. "Age matters: How developmental stages of adulthood affect customer reaction to complaint handling efforts," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 154-164.
    3. Hamza Bahaji, 2011. "Incentives from stock option grants: a behavioral approach," Post-Print halshs-00681607, HAL.
    4. Fabrice Borel-Mathurin & Pierre-Emmanuel Darpeix & Quentin Guibert & Stéphane Loisel, 2018. "Main Determinants of Profit-Sharing Policy in the French Life Insurance Industry," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 43(3), pages 420-455, July.
    5. Ngwira, Bernard & Gerrard, Russell, 2007. "Stochastic pension fund control in the presence of Poisson jumps," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 283-292, March.
    6. Jamie P. Monat, 2009. "The benefits of global scaling in multi-criteria decision analysis," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 4(6), pages 492-508, October.
    7. Grzegorz Maciejewski, 2011. "The Meaning Of Perceived Risk In Purchasing Decisions Of The Polish Customers," Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" din Iasi - Stiinte Economice (1954-2015), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 58, pages 281-304, november.
    8. Sheau-Fen, Yap & Sun-May, Leong & Yu-Ghee, Wee, 2012. "Store brand proneness: Effects of perceived risks, quality and familiarity," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 48-58.
    9. Catherine E. Althaus, 2005. "A Disciplinary Perspective on the Epistemological Status of Risk," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 567-588, June.
    10. Juha Munnukka & Outi Uusitalo & Veera-Juulia Koivisto, 2017. "The consequences of perceived risk and objective knowledge for consumers’ investment behavior," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 150-160, December.
    11. Maurer, Raimond & Mitchell, Olivia S. & Rogalla, Ralph, 2009. "Managing contribution and capital market risk in a funded public defined benefit plan: Impact of CVaR cost constraints," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 25-34, August.
    12. Odunayo Magret Olarewaju & Mishelle Doorasamy & Titilayo Moromoke Oladejo, 2017. "Nexus of Working Capital Management and Firm Performance in Nigerian Food and Beverages Industries: A Link with Risk-Return Theory," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 9(1), pages 90-98.
    13. Cristian Trejos & Adrian van Deemen & Yeny E. Rodriguez & Juan M. Gomez, 2019. "Overconfidence and disposition effect in the stock market : A micro world based setting," Post-Print hal-02312273, HAL.
    14. John Board & Charles Sutcliffe, 2007. "Joined-Up Pensions Policy in the UK: An Asset-Liability Model for Simultaneously Determining the Asset Allocation and Contribution Rate," Economic Analysis, Institute of Economic Sciences, vol. 40(3-4), pages 87-118.
    15. Putthiwanit, Chutinon & Vogler, Denis Marcel & Zhu, Jingling & Kincart, Andrew, 2011. "Exploring consumer’s insights in a unique Thai language course characteristics: the application of conjoint analysis technique," MPRA Paper 33589, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. repec:cup:judgdm:v:4:y:2009:i:6:p:492-508 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Ouidade Sabri & Van Doan Hai & Faten Malek & Hager Bachouche, 2019. "When Is Transparent Packaging Beneficial?," Working Papers 2019-006, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    18. Klaus G. Grunert & Yanfeng Zhou & Marija Banovic & Natascha Loebnitz, 2021. "Supermarket competence in emergent markets: Conceptualization, measurement, effects, and policy implications," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 1633-1659, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    risk management; decision-making; cognitive bias; behavior analysis; hazard adaptation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ito:pchaps:159114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Slobodan Momcilovic (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.intechopen.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.