IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/fpr/ifpric/9781737916475_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Agricultural trade and trade integration in the East African community

In: Africa agriculture trade monitor 2023

Author

Listed:
  • Bouët, Antoine
  • Nimenya, Nicodème

Abstract

The East African Community (EAC) is a regional intergovernmental organization of seven partner states, comprising Burundi, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Kenya, Rwanda, South Sudan, Tanzania, and Uganda, with its headquarters in Arusha, Tanzania. Like other regional trade agreements (RTAs), the EAC pursues economic and political objectives through regional integration. As Eken (1979) explains, there are two main justifications for regional integration, especially for developing countries. First, for economic reasons, regional integration may provide an important instrument of economic growth. Removing barriers to the free movement of goods, labor, and capital between countries leads to the expansion of trade, and therefore of incomes and employment. Large economic entities with their larger markets (people and space) should permit economies of scale in production, leading to an efficient allocation of resources (capital and labor) and attracting substantial foreign direct investment. Second, for political purposes, establishing regional economic communities (RECs) strengthens collective self-reliance and is therefore expected to reinforce the political independence of groups of countries and enlarge their economic and political role in international relations, a point especially important for developing countries. This chapter addresses five main issues concerning the EAC. It first presents the EAC’s origin and main achievements, and then highlights the EAC’s agricultural trade performance relative to other RECs in Africa by comparing agricultural trade indicators, assessing the composition of trade, and identifying the main destinations/origins of agricultural exports/imports across RECs. This section also compares the level of trade integration in the EAC to that of other African RECs to determine its main agricultural comparative advantages. The same analysis is then repeated at the country level. The following section assesses the magnitude of formal (registered) and informal cross-border agricultural trade within the EAC, discusses the factors of trade integration, and highlights the role of tariff and nontariff measures (NTMs), logistic performance, and exchange rates. The final section offers conclusions.

Suggested Citation

  • Bouët, Antoine & Nimenya, Nicodème, 2023. "Agricultural trade and trade integration in the East African community," IFPRI book chapters, in: Africa agriculture trade monitor 2023, chapter 6, pages 175-204, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:fpr:ifpric:9781737916475_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifpri.org/cdmref/p15738coll2/id/136865/filename/137069.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hiau LooiKee & Alessandro Nicita & Marcelo Olarreaga, 2009. "Estimating Trade Restrictiveness Indices," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(534), pages 172-199, January.
    2. Yurendra Basnett, 2013. "Labour Mobility in East Africa: An Analysis of the East African Community's Common Market and the Free Movement of Workers," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 31(2), pages 131-148, March.
    3. Duc Bao Nguyen & Antoine Bouët & Fousseini Traoré, 2022. "On the proper computation of Ad Valorem equivalent of non-tariff measures," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 298-302, February.
    4. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/c8dmi8nm4pdjkuc9g8mck8sc1 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Dirk Willenbockel, 2014. "A General Equilibrium Analysis of the COMESA-EAC-SADC Tripartite FTA," EcoMod2014 7232, EcoMod.
    6. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/c8dmi8nm4pdjkuc9g8mck8sc1 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bouët, Antoine & Elbehri, Aziz & Nguyen, Duc Bao & Traoré, Fousseini, 2022. "Measuring Agricultural Trade Integration in Southeast Asia," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 37(2), pages 235-266.
    2. Edward J. Balistreri & Maryla Maliszewska & Israel Osorio-Rodarte & David G. Tarr & Hidemichi Yonezawa, 2016. "Poverty and Shared Prosperity Implications of Reducing Trade Costs Through Deep Integration in Eastern and Southern Africa," Working Papers 2016-07, Colorado School of Mines, Division of Economics and Business.
    3. Edward J Balistreri & Maryla Maliszewska & Israel Osorio-Rodarte & David G Tarr & Hidemichi Yonezawa, 2018. "Poverty, Welfare and Income Distribution Implications of Reducing Trade Costs Through Deep Integration in Eastern and Southern Africa," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 27(2), pages 172-200.
    4. Edward J. Balistreri & David G. Tarr & Hidemichi Yonezawa, 2015. "Deep Integration in Eastern and Southern Africa: What are the Stakes?," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 24(5), pages 677-706.
    5. Jayson Beckman & Michael E. Johnson & Maros Ivanic, 2024. "Agriculture and AfCFTA: NTM reductions increase intra‐Africa trade," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(2), pages 200-222, March.
    6. Chris Milner, 2013. "Declining Protection in Developing Countries: Fact or Fiction?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(6), pages 689-700, June.
    7. Estrades, Carmen, 2018. "Going backwards: Assessing the impact of NAFTA dissolution on Mexico," Conference papers 332956, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    8. Huy Quang Doan, 2019. "Trade, Institutional Quality and Income: Empirical Evidence for Sub-Saharan Africa," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-23, May.
    9. Pierre, Boulanger & Aikaterini, Kavallari & Luise, Rau Marie & Martine, Rutten, 2013. "Trade openness and investment in North Africa: A CGE application to deep and comprehensive free trade areas (DCFTAs) between the EU and respectively Egypt, Morocco and Tunisia," 2013: Productivity and Its Impacts on Global Trade, June 2-4, 2013. Seville, Spain 152360, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    10. Hoekman, Bernard & Nicita, Alessandro, 2011. "Trade Policy, Trade Costs, and Developing Country Trade," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(12), pages 2069-2079.
    11. Götz, Christian & Heckelei, Thomas & Rudloff, Bettina, 2010. "What makes countries initiate WTO disputes on food-related issues?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 154-162, April.
    12. Fontagné, Lionel & Orefice, Gianluca & Piermartini, Roberta & Rocha, Nadia, 2015. "Product standards and margins of trade: Firm-level evidence," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 29-44.
    13. Takatsuka, Hajime & Zeng, Dao-Zhi, 2016. "Nontariff protection without an outside good," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 65-78.
    14. Chad P. Bown & Patricia Tovar, 2016. "Preferential Liberalization, Antidumping, and Safeguards: Stumbling Block Evidence from MERCOSUR," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 262-294, November.
    15. Kym Anderson, 2006. "Reducing Distortions to Agricultural Incentives: Progress, Pitfalls, and Prospects," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 88(5), pages 1135-1146.
    16. de Melo, Jaime & Vijil, Mariana, 2014. "Barriers to Trade in Environmental Goods and Environmental Services: How Important Are They? How Much Progress at Reducing Them?," Climate Change and Sustainable Development 172425, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    17. Beniamino Quintieri & Giovanni Stamato, 2023. "Are preferential agreements beneficial to EU trade? New evidence from the EU–South Korea treaty," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(12), pages 3511-3541, December.
    18. Kym Anderson & Johan Swinnen, 2008. "Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in Europe's Transition Economies," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6502.
    19. Aikaterini Kavallari & Marie-Luise Rau & Martine Rutten, 2013. "Economic Growth in the Euro-Med Area through Trade Integration: Focus on Agriculture and Food. Regional impact analysis," JRC Research Reports JRC84800, Joint Research Centre.
    20. D. A. Izotov & K. I. Tochkov, 2020. "Interaction of the Russian Far East and Asia-Pacific Countries: Assessment of Institutional and Tariff Barriers to Trade," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 182-193, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:ifpric:9781737916475_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.