IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/14427_13.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Finnish approach to innovation strategy and indicators

In: Handbook of Innovation Indicators and Measurement

Author

Listed:
  • Esko Aho
  • Mikko Alkio
  • Ilkka Lakaniemi

Abstract

This Handbook comprehensively examines indicators and statistical measurement related to innovation (as defined in the OECD/Eurostat Oslo Manual). It deals with the development and the use of innovation indicators to support decision-making and is written by authors who are practitioners, who know what works and what does not, in order to improve the development of indicators to satisfy future policy needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Esko Aho & Mikko Alkio & Ilkka Lakaniemi, 2013. "The Finnish approach to innovation strategy and indicators," Chapters, in: Fred Gault (ed.), Handbook of Innovation Indicators and Measurement, chapter 13, pages 320-332, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:14427_13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/9780857933645.00024.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fred Gault, 2013. "Innovation indicators and measurement: an overview," Chapters, in: Fred Gault (ed.), Handbook of Innovation Indicators and Measurement, chapter 1, pages 3-38, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Carl J. Dahlman & Jorma Routti & Pekka Ylä-Anttila, 2006. "Finland as a Knowledge Economy : Elements of Success and Lessons Learned," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 7138.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fernando Galindo-Rueda, 2013. "The OECD measurement agenda for innovation," Chapters, in: Fred Gault (ed.), Handbook of Innovation Indicators and Measurement, chapter 9, pages 217-246, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Osiris Parcero & James Christopher Ryan, 2024. "Becoming a Knowledge Economy: the Case of Qatar, UAE and 17 Benchmark Countries," Papers 2401.04214, arXiv.org.
    3. Konstantin Fursov & Ian Miles, 2013. "Framing Emerging Nanotechnologies: Steps Towards A Forward-Looking Analysis Of Skills," HSE Working papers WP BRP 15/STI/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    4. Osiris Jorge Parcero & James Christopher Ryan, 2017. "Becoming a Knowledge Economy: the Case of Qatar, UAE, and 17 Benchmark Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(4), pages 1146-1173, December.
    5. Heikki Eskelinen & Matti Fritsch, 2009. "Polycentricity in the North-eastern Periphery of the EU Territory," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 605-619, April.
    6. Peter Knight & Jorma Routti, 2011. "e-Development and Consensus Formation in Finland," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 2(1), pages 117-144, March.
    7. Sami Moisio & Ugo Rossi, 2020. "The start-up state: Governing urbanised capitalism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(3), pages 532-552, May.
    8. Jeroen P.J. de Jong & Eric von Hippel, 2013. "User innovation: business and consumers," Chapters, in: Fred Gault (ed.), Handbook of Innovation Indicators and Measurement, chapter 5, pages 109-132, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Pontus Braunerhjelm & Magnus Henrekson, 2016. "An Innovation Policy Framework: Bridging the Gap Between Industrial Dynamics and Growth," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, in: David B. Audretsch & Albert N. Link (ed.), Essays in Public Sector Entrepreneurship, edition 1, chapter 0, pages 95-130, Springer.
    10. Driss Tsouli & Bouchra Elabbadi, 2018. "Intellectual Capital of Africa: Comparison of the Five Most Competitive Countries," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(2), pages 71-84, June.
    11. Daniele SCHILIRÒ, 2012. "Knowledge-Based Economies And The Institutional Environment," Theoretical and Practical Research in the Economic Fields, ASERS Publishing, vol. 3(1), pages 42-50.
    12. Tuomo Nikulainen, 2012. "R&D Collaboration And Nanotechnology — An Opportunity For Traditional Industries," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(03), pages 1-16.
    13. Cristiano Antonelli & Francesco Quatraro, 2010. "The effects of biased technological change on total factor productivity: empirical evidence from a sample of OECD countries," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 361-383, August.
    14. Magnus Henrekson & Tino Sanandaji, 2015. "Superentrepreneurship and global imbalances: closing Europe’s gap to other industrialized regions," Chapters, in: Antonina Bakardjieva Engelbrekt & Moa Mårtensson & Lars Oxelheim & Thomas Persson (ed.), The EU’s Role in Fighting Global Imbalances, chapter 4, pages 58-88, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Kaplan, David, 2012. "South African mining equipment and specialist services: Technological capacity, export performance and policy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 425-433.
    16. Sam Mitra, 2019. "Depletion, technology, and productivity growth in the metallic minerals industry," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 32(1), pages 19-37, April.
    17. Peter Knight, 2011. "e-Development in Brasil," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 2(1), pages 77-116, March.
    18. Carol Marie Kiriakos, 2011. "Why Being There Matters: Finnish Professionals in Silicon Valley," Chapters, in: David Emanuel Andersson & Åke E. Andersson & Charlotta Mellander (ed.), Handbook of Creative Cities, chapter 15, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Anthony Arundel & Kieran O’Brien & Ann Torugsa, 2013. "How firm managers understand innovation: implications for the design of innovation surveys," Chapters, in: Fred Gault (ed.), Handbook of Innovation Indicators and Measurement, chapter 4, pages 88-108, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Paweł Łukasik, 2017. "Pomiar Innowacyjności Z Perspektywy Przedsiębiorstwa," Nowoczesne Systemy Zarządzania. Modern Management Systems, Military University of Technology, Faculty of Security, Logistics and Management, Institute of Organization and Management, issue 3, pages 83-94.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:14427_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.