IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pco941.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Amanda Megan Cole

Personal Details

First Name:Amanda
Middle Name:Megan
Last Name:Cole
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pco941
Southside, 7th Floor, 105 Victoria St, London, SW1E 6QT
+44 (0)20 7747 8861
Terminal Degree:2013 (from RePEc Genealogy)

Affiliation

Office of Health Economics

London, United Kingdom
http://www.ohe.org/
RePEc:edi:ohecouk (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Amanda Cole;Adrian Towse;Bernarda Zamora, 2019. "Indication-Based Pricing (IBP) Discussion Paper: Should drug prices differ by indication?," Briefing 002165, Office of Health Economics.
  2. Amanda Cole;Adrian Towse;Bernarda Zamora, 2019. "Documento de debate sobre la fijación de precios en función de la indicación (IBP) ¿Deben variar los precios de los medicamentos según la indicación?," Briefing 002176, Office of Health Economics.
  3. Amanda Cole;Grace Hampson;Nancy Devlin;David Grainger;Eui-Kyung Lee;Wija Oortwijn, 2016. "“New Age” Decision Making in HTA: Is It Applicable in Asia?," Briefing 001741, Office of Health Economics.
  4. Amanda Cole;Adrian Towse;Michelle Mujoomdar;Arnold Chan;Franz Pichler, 2016. "How Can Health Technology Assessments in the Asia-Pacific Area Respond to Increased Clinical Uncertainty as a Consequence of Expedited US and EU Regulatory Processes?," Briefing 001740, Office of Health Economics.
    repec:ohe:respap:002115 is not listed on IDEAS
    repec:ohe:respap:002392 is not listed on IDEAS
    repec:ohe:conrep:001595 is not listed on IDEAS
    repec:ohe:conrep:001910 is not listed on IDEAS
    repec:ohe:conrep:002261 is not listed on IDEAS
    repec:ohe:respap:002139 is not listed on IDEAS
    repec:ohe:conrep:001576 is not listed on IDEAS
    repec:ohe:conrep:002380 is not listed on IDEAS
    repec:ohe:conrep:001748 is not listed on IDEAS
    repec:ohe:conrep:002096 is not listed on IDEAS
    repec:ohe:respap:001777 is not listed on IDEAS
    repec:ohe:respap:002030 is not listed on IDEAS
    repec:ohe:conrep:002009 is not listed on IDEAS
    repec:ohe:respap:001703 is not listed on IDEAS
    repec:ohe:conrep:002280 is not listed on IDEAS
    repec:ohe:conrep:001660 is not listed on IDEAS
    repec:ohe:conrep:001976 is not listed on IDEAS

Articles

  1. Paula Lorgelly & Jack Pollard & Patricia Cubi-Molla & Amanda Cole & Duncan Sim & Jon Sussex, 2020. "Outcome-Based Payment Schemes: What Outcomes Do Patients with Cancer Value?," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 13(5), pages 599-610, October.
  2. Amanda Cole & Koonal Shah & Brendan Mulhern & Yan Feng & Nancy Devlin, 2018. "Valuing EQ-5D-5L health states ‘in context’ using a discrete choice experiment," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(4), pages 595-605, May.
  3. Emma Cowles & Grace Marsden & Amanda Cole & Nancy Devlin, 2017. "A Review of NICE Methods and Processes Across Health Technology Assessment Programmes: Why the Differences and What is the Impact?," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 469-477, August.
  4. A. Chapman & C. Taylor & A. Girling, 2014. "Are the UK Systems of Innovation and Evaluation of Medical Devices Compatible? The Role of NICE’s Medical Technologies Evaluation Programme (MTEP)," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 347-357, August.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

    Sorry, no citations of working papers recorded.

Articles

  1. Paula Lorgelly & Jack Pollard & Patricia Cubi-Molla & Amanda Cole & Duncan Sim & Jon Sussex, 2020. "Outcome-Based Payment Schemes: What Outcomes Do Patients with Cancer Value?," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 13(5), pages 599-610, October.

    Cited by:

    1. Owen J. Nicholas & Olivier Joseph & Annie Keane & Kate Cleary & Sue H. Campbell & Sarah H. Gwynne & Tom Crosby & Ganesh Radhakrishna & Maria A. Hawkins, 2021. "Patient and Public Involvement Refines the Design of ProtOeus: A Proposed Phase II Trial of Proton Beam Therapy in Oesophageal Cancer," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 14(5), pages 545-553, September.

  2. Amanda Cole & Koonal Shah & Brendan Mulhern & Yan Feng & Nancy Devlin, 2018. "Valuing EQ-5D-5L health states ‘in context’ using a discrete choice experiment," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(4), pages 595-605, May.

    Cited by:

    1. Brendan Mulhern & Richard Norman & Koonal Shah & Nick Bansback & Louise Longworth & Rosalie Viney, 2018. "How Should Discrete Choice Experiments with Duration Choice Sets Be Presented for the Valuation of Health States?," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 38(3), pages 306-318, April.
    2. Brendan Mulhern & Richard Norman & Deborah J. Street & Rosalie Viney, 2019. "One Method, Many Methodological Choices: A Structured Review of Discrete-Choice Experiments for Health State Valuation," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 29-43, January.
    3. Nancy J. Devlin & Koonal K. Shah & Brendan J. Mulhern & Krystallia Pantiri & Ben van Hout, 2019. "A new method for valuing health: directly eliciting personal utility functions," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(2), pages 257-270, March.

  3. Emma Cowles & Grace Marsden & Amanda Cole & Nancy Devlin, 2017. "A Review of NICE Methods and Processes Across Health Technology Assessment Programmes: Why the Differences and What is the Impact?," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 469-477, August.

    Cited by:

    1. James Love-Koh & Alison Peel & Juan Carlos Rejon-Parrilla & Kate Ennis & Rosemary Lovett & Andrea Manca & Anastasia Chalkidou & Hannah Wood & Matthew Taylor, 2018. "The Future of Precision Medicine: Potential Impacts for Health Technology Assessment," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 36(12), pages 1439-1451, December.
    2. Eve Wittenberg & Lyndon P. James & Lisa A. Prosser, 2019. "Spillover Effects on Caregivers’ and Family Members’ Utility: A Systematic Review of the Literature," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 475-499, April.
    3. Francisca Crispi & Huseyin Naci & Eva Barkauskaite & Leeza Osipenko & Elias Mossialos, 2019. "Assessment of Devices, Diagnostics and Digital Technologies: A Review of NICE Medical Technologies Guidance," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 189-211, April.
    4. Dale, Elina & Evans, David B. & Gopinathan, Unni & Kurowski, Christoph & Norheim, Ole F. & Ottersen, Trygve & Voorhoeve, Alex, 2023. "Open and inclusive: fair processes for financing universal health coverage," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119795, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

  4. A. Chapman & C. Taylor & A. Girling, 2014. "Are the UK Systems of Innovation and Evaluation of Medical Devices Compatible? The Role of NICE’s Medical Technologies Evaluation Programme (MTEP)," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 347-357, August.

    Cited by:

    1. Anderson, Michael & Drummond, Michael & Taylor, David & McGuire, Alistair & Carter, Paul & Mossialos, Elias, 2022. "Promoting innovation while controlling cost: The UK's approach to health technology assessment," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 224-233.
    2. Oriana Ciani & Britni Wilcher & Anoukh van Giessen & Rod S. Taylor, 2017. "Linking the Regulatory and Reimbursement Processes for Medical Devices: The Need for Integrated Assessments," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(S1), pages 13-29, February.
    3. Emma Cowles & Grace Marsden & Amanda Cole & Nancy Devlin, 2017. "A Review of NICE Methods and Processes Across Health Technology Assessment Programmes: Why the Differences and What is the Impact?," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 469-477, August.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 11 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-HEA: Health Economics (6) 2018-05-21 2018-05-21 2018-05-21 2018-05-28 2018-07-16 2020-08-31. Author is listed
  2. NEP-IAS: Insurance Economics (2) 2019-03-04 2019-03-25
  3. NEP-INO: Innovation (2) 2018-07-16 2018-12-24
  4. NEP-BEC: Business Economics (1) 2019-05-20
  5. NEP-EUR: Microeconomic European Issues (1) 2018-05-21
  6. NEP-LAW: Law and Economics (1) 2018-12-24
  7. NEP-SEA: South East Asia (1) 2018-05-21

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Amanda Megan Cole should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.