IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pbo563.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Sarah Borgloh

(We have lost contact with this author. Please ask them to update the entry or send us the correct address or status for this person. Thank you.)

Personal Details

First Name:Sarah
Middle Name:
Last Name:Borgloh
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pbo563
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
The above email address does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Sarah Borgloh to update the entry or send us the correct address or status for this person. Thank you.

Affiliation

Leibniz-Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW)

Mannheim, Germany
http://www.zew.de/
RePEc:edi:zemande (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Borgloh, Sarah & Dannenberg, Astrid & Aretz, Bodo, 2010. "Small is beautiful: Experimental evidence of donors' preferences for charities," ZEW Discussion Papers 10-052, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
  2. Borgloh, Sarah & Dannenberg, Astrid & Aretz, Bodo, 2010. "On the construction of social preferences in lab experiments," ZEW Discussion Papers 10-085, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
  3. Borgloh, Sarah & Westerheide, Peter, 2010. "Social return on investment of mutual support based housing projects: Potential for socio-economic cost savings and higher living quality," ZEW Discussion Papers 10-029, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
  4. Borgloh, Sarah, 2008. "What Drives Giving in Extensive Welfare States? The Case of Germany," ZEW Discussion Papers 08-123, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
  5. Sarah Borgloh & Frank Kupferschmidt & Berthold U. Wigger, 2007. "Verteilungseffekte der öffentlichen Finanzierung der Hochschulbildung in Deutschland: eine Längsschnittbetrachtung auf der Basis des Sozio-oekonomischen Panels," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 42, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).

Articles

  1. Borgloh Sarah & Kupferschmidt Frank & Wigger Berthold U., 2008. "Verteilungseffekte der öffentlichen Finanzierung der Hochschulbildung in Deutschland: Eine Längsschnittbetrachtung auf der Basis des Sozioökonomischen Panels / The Distributional Effects of Public Hig," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 228(1), pages 25-48, February.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Borgloh, Sarah & Dannenberg, Astrid & Aretz, Bodo, 2010. "Small is beautiful: Experimental evidence of donors' preferences for charities," ZEW Discussion Papers 10-052, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Abhishek Bhati & Ruth K. Hansen, 2020. "A literature review of experimental studies in fundraising," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 3(1).
    2. Jade Wong & Andreas Ortman, 2013. "Do Donors Care About the Price of Giving? A Review of the Evidence, with Some Theory to Organize It," Discussion Papers 2013-22, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    3. Nadine Chlaß & Lata Gangadharan & Kristy Jones, 2015. "Charitable Giving and Intermediation," Monash Economics Working Papers 18-15, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    4. Vonțea Andreea-Angela, 2018. "Determinants of the Individuals’ Willingness to Support Nonprofit Organizations – An Integrative Theoretical Perspective," International Conference on Marketing and Business Development Journal, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(2), pages 84-91, December.
    5. Jake Guth & David Munro, 2020. "Preferences for efficiency and redistribution: An experiment using charitable donations," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(3), pages 2217-2226.
    6. Müller, Stephan & Rau, Holger A., 2015. "Risk-tolerant women donate more than men: Experimental evidence of dictator games," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 264, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    7. Metzger, Laura, 2015. "Making an impact? The importance of aid effectiveness for charitable giving. A laboratory experiment," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 112835, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    8. Daniel A Brent & Nathan W Chan, 2019. "Local Public Goods and the Crowding-out Hypothesis: Evidence from Civic Crowdfunding," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(3), pages 2142-2154.
    9. Ivo Bischoff & Thomas Krauskopf, 2013. "Motives of pro-social behavior in individual versus collective decisions – a comparative experimental study," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201319, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    10. Hennessy, Jack & Mortimer, Duncan & Sweeney, Rohan & Woode, Maame Esi, 2023. "Donor versus recipient preferences for aid allocation: A systematic review of stated-preference studies," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).

  2. Borgloh, Sarah & Dannenberg, Astrid & Aretz, Bodo, 2010. "On the construction of social preferences in lab experiments," ZEW Discussion Papers 10-085, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. John Smith, 2012. "The endogenous nature of the measurement of social preferences," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 11(2), pages 235-256, December.
    2. Ulrik H. Nielsen, 2014. "Parents' Education and their Adult Offspring's Other-Regarding Behavour," Discussion Papers 14-03, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.

  3. Borgloh, Sarah, 2008. "What Drives Giving in Extensive Welfare States? The Case of Germany," ZEW Discussion Papers 08-123, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Adena, Maja, 2021. "Tax-price elasticity of charitable donations – evidence from the German taxpayer panel," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 219-235.

  4. Sarah Borgloh & Frank Kupferschmidt & Berthold U. Wigger, 2007. "Verteilungseffekte der öffentlichen Finanzierung der Hochschulbildung in Deutschland: eine Längsschnittbetrachtung auf der Basis des Sozio-oekonomischen Panels," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 42, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).

    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Eck & Sabine Gralka & Julia Sonnenburg & Wolfgang Nagl & Joachim Ragnitz, 2015. "Hochschulfinanzierung in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern," ifo Dresden Studien, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 75.
    2. Hügle, Dominik, 2020. "Higher education funding in Germany: A distributional lifetime perspective," Discussion Papers 2021/1, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    3. Wolfram F. Richter & Berthold U. Wigger, 2012. "Besteuerung des Humanvermögens," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 13(1-2), pages 82-102, February.
    4. Regina T. Riphahn & Martina Eschelbach & Guido Heineck & Steffen Müller, 2010. "Kosten und Nutzen der Ausbildung an Tertiärbildungsinstitutionen im Vergleich," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 11(2), pages 103-131, May.
    5. Stefanie Gäbler, 2015. "Gekommen, um zu bleiben – Fiskalische Effekte ausländischer Studierender in Deutschland," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 22(05), pages 32-41, October.
    6. N. G. Glavatskaya (ed.), 2010. "Экономика Переходного Периода. Сборник Избранных Работ. 2003-2009," Books, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, edition 1, volume 1, number 1.

Articles

    Sorry, no citations of articles recorded.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 3 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-CBE: Cognitive and Behavioural Economics (2) 2010-10-02 2010-12-11
  2. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (2) 2010-10-02 2010-12-11
  3. NEP-EVO: Evolutionary Economics (1) 2010-12-11
  4. NEP-GTH: Game Theory (1) 2010-12-11
  5. NEP-PPM: Project, Program and Portfolio Management (1) 2010-06-11
  6. NEP-UPT: Utility Models and Prospect Theory (1) 2010-12-11
  7. NEP-URE: Urban and Real Estate Economics (1) 2010-06-11

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Sarah Borgloh should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.