IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/sfustu/250028.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Die Internationalisierung der Unternehmerfamilie: Reformvorschläge für die Wegzugsbesteuerung

Author

Listed:
  • Kudert, Stephan
  • Hagemann, Tobias
  • Kahlenberg, Christian

Abstract

Zieht ein Gesellschafter eines Familienunternehmens ins außereuropäische Ausland, wird sofort die Wegzugssteuer auf seinen Unternehmensanteil gefordert - in Höhe seines persönlichen Einkommensteuersatzes. Zwar gibt es Regelungen für Stundungen, doch sind diese uneinheitlich und vom Zielland und dessen Absprache mit den deutschen Finanzbehörden abhängig. Die Wegzugsbesteuerung bedroht die Substanz von Familienunternehmen und hemmt dadurch deren Gesellschafter an der Internationalisierung. Die Stiftung Familienunternehmen stellt Reformvorschläge vor, die Prof. Dr. Stephan Kudert von der Europa-Universität Viadrina in Frankfurt (Oder) in der vorliegenden Studie erarbeitet hat.

Suggested Citation

  • Kudert, Stephan & Hagemann, Tobias & Kahlenberg, Christian, 2017. "Die Internationalisierung der Unternehmerfamilie: Reformvorschläge für die Wegzugsbesteuerung," Studien, Stiftung Familienunternehmen / Foundation for Family Businesses, number 250028, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:sfustu:250028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/250028/1/1789430682.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul J.J. Welfens, 2017. "An Accidental Brexit," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-319-58271-9, July.
    2. Paul J.J. Welfens, 2017. "The True Cost of BREXIT for the UK: A Research Note," EIIW Discussion paper disbei234, Universitätsbibliothek Wuppertal, University Library.
    3. Matthes, Jürgen, 2017. "Wachstumskosten des Brexit," IW-Kurzberichte 81.2017, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute.
    4. Holger Breinlich & Elsa Leromain & Dennis Novy & Thomas Sampson, 2022. "The Brexit Vote, Inflation And U.K. Living Standards," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(1), pages 63-93, February.
    5. Grömling, Michael & Matthes, Jürgen, 2017. "Deutsche Unternehmen sehen den Brexit gelassen," IW-Kurzberichte 8.2017, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute.
    6. Till Nikolka & Panu Poutvaara, 2017. "Brexit – Theory and Empirics," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 17(04), pages 68-75, January.
    7. Franklin Allen & John Armour & Morten Balling & Anthony Belchambers & Jon Danielsson & Ernest Gnan & Charles Grant & Piers Haben & Patricia Jackson & Robert Macrae & Eva Micheler & Menno Middeldorp & , 2017. "Brexit and the implications for financial services," SUERF Studies, SUERF - The European Money and Finance Forum, number 2017/1 edited by Patricia Jackson, May.
    8. Sascha Becker & Thiemo Fetzer & Dennis Novy & Sascha O. Becker, 2017. "Who Voted for Brexit?," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 15(04), pages 03-05, December.
    9. Grömling, Michael & Matthes, Jürgen, 2017. "German companies relaxed about Brexit," IW-Kurzberichte 8.2017e, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute.
    10. Paul J. J. Welfens & Michael Hüther & Matthias Diermeier & Gabriel Felbermayr & Jasmin Gröschl & Karsten Nowrot & Andreas Grimmel, 2017. "Wie geht es mit dem Brexit weiter? [Brexit: What Are the Next Steps?]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 97(8), pages 535-557, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Swati Dhingra & Thomas Sampson, 2022. "Expecting Brexit," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 495-519, August.
    2. Thomas Aronsson & Clemens Hetschko & Ronnie Schöb, 2020. "Globalization, Time-Preferences, and Populist Voting," CESifo Working Paper Series 8466, CESifo.
    3. Manuel Funke & Moritz Schularick & Christoph Trebesch, 2023. "Populist Leaders and the Economy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 113(12), pages 3249-3288, December.
    4. Gabriel J. Felbermayr & Clemens Fuest & Hans Gersbach & Albrecht O. Ritschl & Marcel Thum & Martin T. Braml, 2019. "Hard Brexit ahead: breaking the deadlock," EconPol Policy Brief 12, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    5. Thiemo Fetzer & Stephan Kyburz, 2024. "Cohesive Institutions and Political Violence," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 106(1), pages 133-150, January.
    6. Sascha O. Becker & Thiemo Fetzer, 2018. "Has Eastern European Migration Impacted UK-born Workers?," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 376, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    7. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Neil Lee & Cornelius Lipp, 2021. "Golfing with Trump. Social capital, decline, inequality, and the rise of populism in the US," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 14(3), pages 457-481.
    8. Amory Gethin & Clara Martínez-Toledano & Thomas Piketty, 2022. "Brahmin Left Versus Merchant Right: Changing Political Cleavages in 21 Western Democracies, 1948–2020," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 137(1), pages 1-48.
    9. Bachtrögler, Julia & Oberhofer, Harald, 2018. "Euroscepticism and EU Cohesion Policy: The Impact of Micro-Level Policy Effectiveness on Voting Behavior," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 273, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    10. Mona Foertsch & Felix Roesel, 2023. "Sports Clubs and Populism: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from German Cities," CESifo Working Paper Series 10259, CESifo.
    11. Sebastian Doerr & Stefan Gissler & José-Luis Peydró & Hans-Joachim Voth, 2018. "From finance to fascism," Economics Working Papers 1651, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Nov 2020.
    12. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/1divsbu8t888r9vqektjbmlqoa is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Andres Rodriguez-Pose & Javier Terrero-Davila & Neil Lee, 2023. "Left-behind vs. unequal places: interpersonal inequality, economic decline, and the rise of populism in the US and Europe," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2306, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Mar 2023.
    14. Polyzos, Stathis & Samitas, Aristeidis & Katsaiti, Marina-Selini, 2020. "Who is unhappy for Brexit? A machine-learning, agent-based study on financial instability," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    15. Victor Ginsburgh & Sergio Perelman & Pierre Pestieau, 2021. "Populism and Social Polarization in European Democracies [Bien-Être et Vote]," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 67(4), pages 371-404.
    16. Annie Tubadji & Thomas Colwill & Don Webber, 2021. "Voting with your feet or voting for Brexit: The tale of those stuck behind," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(2), pages 247-277, April.
    17. Simon Rudkin & Lucy Barros & Paweł Dłotko & Wanling Qiu, 2024. "An economic topology of the Brexit vote," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(3), pages 601-618, March.
    18. Sebastian Doerr & Stefan Gissler & José‐Luis Peydró & Hans‐Joachim Voth, 2022. "Financial Crises and Political Radicalization: How Failing Banks Paved Hitler's Path to Power," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 77(6), pages 3339-3372, December.
    19. Gabriel Loumeau, 2022. "Land Consolidation Reforms: A Natural Experiment on the Economic and Political Effects of Agricultural Mechanization," CER-ETH Economics working paper series 22/376, CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich.
    20. Maria Abreu & Özge Öner, 2020. "Disentangling the Brexit vote: The role of economic, social and cultural contexts in explaining the UK’s EU referendum vote," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(7), pages 1434-1456, October.
    21. Giammetti, Raffaele, 2019. "Tariffs, Domestic Import Substitution and Trade Diversion in Input-Output Production Networks: how to deal with Brexit," MPRA Paper 93229, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:sfustu:250028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.familienunternehmen.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.