IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/rwipro/113893.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Erhebung des Energieverbrauchs der privaten Haushalte für die Jahre 2011-2013: Bericht für das Projekt Erhebung des Energieverbrauchs der privaten Haushalte für die Jahre 2006-2013

Author

Listed:
  • Frondel, Manuel
  • Andor, Mark
  • Ritter, Nolan
  • Sommer, Stephan
  • Vance, Colin
  • Matuschek, Peter
  • Müller, Ute

Abstract

Ziel dieser Studie ist die Schätzung des Energieverbrauchs privater Haushalte in Deutschland für die Jahre 2011 bis 2013 mittels einer Stichprobenerhebung, die mittlerweile auf einem aus rund 15 000 Haushalten bestehenden repräsentativen Panel des forsa-Instituts basiert. Die Haushalte werden umfassend zu ihrem Verbrauch der jeweils von ihnen verwendeten Energieträger, ihren Wohnverhältnissen und den Charakteristika des bewohnten Gebäudes befragt. Ausgehend von einer Nettostichprobe von 8 561 Haushalten, was einer Teilnahmequote von 57% entspricht, wird für jeden einzelnen Energieträger die aus der Stichprobe ermittelte Verbrauchskennziffer auf die Grundgesamtheit aller privaten Haushalte in Deutschland hochgerechnet. Die Ergebnisse für die Jahre 2011 bis 2013 werden mit denen des Jahres 2010 der vorigen Studie von RWI und forsa (2013) verglichen. Diese beruhte ebenfalls auf dem forsa-Haushaltspanel und demselben Erhebungsinstrument. Vorteilhaft in Bezug auf die Präzision der Schätzungen ist, dass die Nettostichprobe gegenüber den früheren Studien von RWI und forsa (2008, 2010, 2013) um rund 2 000 Haushalte erweitert werden konnte. Über die Verbrauchserhebung und -hochrechnung hinaus wird im Rahmen dieses Forschungsprojekts auch die aus dem Energieverbrauch resultierende Kostenbelastung der privaten Haushalte für das Jahr 2012 analysiert.

Suggested Citation

  • Frondel, Manuel & Andor, Mark & Ritter, Nolan & Sommer, Stephan & Vance, Colin & Matuschek, Peter & Müller, Ute, 2015. "Erhebung des Energieverbrauchs der privaten Haushalte für die Jahre 2011-2013: Bericht für das Projekt Erhebung des Energieverbrauchs der privaten Haushalte für die Jahre 2006-2013," RWI Projektberichte, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, number 113893, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:rwipro:113893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/113893/1/833342274.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ziliak, Stephen T. & McCloskey, Deirdre N., 2004. "Size matters: the standard error of regressions in the American Economic Review," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 527-546, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Singhal, Puja & Pahle, Michael & Kalkuhl, Matthias & Levesque, Antoine & Sommer, Stephan & Berneiser, Jessica, 2022. "Beyond good faith: Why evidence-based policy is necessary to decarbonize buildings cost-effectively in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rachel G. Childers, 2011. "Being One'S Own Boss: How Does Risk Fit In?," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 56(1), pages 48-58, May.
    2. Armstrong, J. Scott & Green, Kesten C. & Graefe, Andreas, 2015. "Golden rule of forecasting: Be conservative," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(8), pages 1717-1731.
    3. Anupama Sen and Tooraj Jamasb, 2012. "Diversity in Unity: An Empirical Analysis of Electricity Deregulation in Indian States," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    4. Ron Johnston, 2005. "Editorial," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(1), pages 2-8, January.
    5. Thomas Mayer, 2012. "Ziliak and McCloskey's Criticisms of Significance Tests: An Assessment," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 9(3), pages 256-297, September.
    6. Xinyu (Jason) Cao, 2009. "Disentangling the influence of neighborhood type and self-selection on driving behavior: an application of sample selection model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 207-222, March.
    7. Thomas Mayer, 2006. "The Empirical Significance of Econometric Models," Working Papers 620, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
    8. Stephen T. Ziliak & Deirdre N. McCloskey, 2013. "We Agree That Statistical Significance Proves Essentially Nothing: A Rejoinder to Thomas Mayer," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 10(1), pages 97-107, January.
    9. Markus P. A. Schneider, 2013. "Race & Gender Differences in the Experience of Earnings Inequality in the US from 1995 to 2010," Working Papers 1303, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.
    10. Petersen, Verner C., 2005. "The otherworldly view of economics - and its consequences," Working Papers 2005-13, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Management.
    11. Denis Fougère & Nicolas Jacquemet, 2020. "Policy Evaluation Using Causal Inference Methods," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03455978, HAL.
    12. Peter Carey & Brad Potter & George Tanewski, 2014. "Application of the Reporting Entity Concept in Australia," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 50(4), pages 460-489, December.
    13. Nelson, Julie A., 2011. "Would Women Leaders Have Prevented the Global Financial Crisis? Implications for Teaching about Gender, Behavior, and Economics," Working Papers 179096, Tufts University, Global Development and Environment Institute.
    14. Brodeur, Abel & Cook, Nikolai & Heyes, Anthony, 2022. "We Need to Talk about Mechanical Turk: What 22,989 Hypothesis Tests Tell us about p-Hacking and Publication Bias in Online Experiments," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1157, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    15. Xinyu (Jason) Cao, 2010. "Exploring Causal Effects of Neighborhood Type on Walking Behavior Using Stratification on the Propensity Score," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(2), pages 487-504, February.
    16. Andreas Bergh & Magnus Henrekson, 2011. "Government Size And Growth: A Survey And Interpretation Of The Evidence," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(5), pages 872-897, December.
    17. Eszter Czibor & David Jimenez‐Gomez & John A. List, 2019. "The Dozen Things Experimental Economists Should Do (More of)," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 86(2), pages 371-432, October.
    18. H. E. T. Holgersson & T. Norman & S. Tavassoli, 2014. "In the quest for economic significance: assessing variable importance through mean value decomposition," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(8), pages 545-549, May.
    19. Timothy R. Wojan & Jason P. Brown & Dayton M. Lambert, 2014. "What to Do about the "Cult of Statistical Significance"? A Renewable Fuel Application using the Neyman-Pearson Protocol," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 36(4), pages 674-695.
    20. Ronald W. Michener & Robert E. Wright, 2006. "Miscounting Money of Colonial America," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 3(1), pages 4-44, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:rwipro:113893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rwiesde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.