IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/mpifgs/24.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Private Regierungen in der Techniksteuerung: Eine sozialwissenschaftliche Analyse der technischen Normung

Author

Listed:
  • Voelzkow, Helmut

Abstract

Vielen gilt die Mitwirkung privater Organisationen an der technischen Normung als ein Paradebeispiel möglicher Staatsentlastung. Andere äußern erhebliche Vorbehalte an der öffentlichen Effektivität und Legitimität solcher "privaten Regierungen". Die Sudie untersucht das verbandliche System technischer Normung in Deutschland und in Europa aus einem steuerungs- und demokratietheoretischen Blickwinkel. Besonderes Augenmerk findet die prozedurale Steuerung der technischen Normung durch staatliche und suprastaatliche Akteure. Diese Interventionen in die verbandlichen Arrangements erzeugen im Verhältnis von staatlicher und verbandlicher Regulierung eine neue Qualität, der die herkömmliche Kritik korporatistischer Arrangements nicht mehr gerecht wird.

Suggested Citation

  • Voelzkow, Helmut, 1996. "Private Regierungen in der Techniksteuerung: Eine sozialwissenschaftliche Analyse der technischen Normung," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 24, number 24.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgs:24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/209614/1/mpifg-bd-24.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. B. Unger & F. van Waarden, 2009. "Attempts to Dodge Drowning in Data: Rule- and Risk-Based Anti Money Laundering Policies Compared," Working Papers 09-19, Utrecht School of Economics.
    2. Freimuth, Claudia & Oelmann, Mark & Amann, Erwin, 2018. "Development and prospects of standardization in the German municipal wastewater sector: Version 1.0," IBES Diskussionsbeiträge 223, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute of Business and Economic Studie (IBES).
    3. Werle, Raymund, 2000. "Institutional aspects of standardization: Jurisdictional conflicts and choice of standardization organizations," MPIfG Discussion Paper 00/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    4. Unger Brigitte & van Waarden Frans, 2009. "How to Dodge Drowning in Data? Rule- and Risk-Based Anti Money Laundering Policies Compared," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 953-985, December.
    5. Mayntz, Renate, 2000. "Politikwissenschaft in einer entgrenzten Welt," MPIfG Discussion Paper 00/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgs:24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mpigfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.