IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/esthes/312787.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Institutional perspectives on corporate social responsibility (CSR) in agricultural enterprises amidst social movement debates

Author

Listed:
  • Hajdu, Annamaria

Abstract

As climate extremes intensify, biodiversity declines, and ecosystems degrade, agriculture faces scrutiny as both a driver and a victim of these crises. Its dependence on fossil fuels and ethical concerns around intensive farming fuel criticism from civil society. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in agribusiness relies on voluntary frameworks, yet these often overlook key social and environmental issues. Large farming enterprises engage in CSR, but tensions with activist groups persist, as voluntary efforts fail to meet societal expectations. This study examines CSR in large-scale farming across Argentina, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Romania, uncovering individual motivations, activist resistance, and institutional influences. Using interviews, surveys, participant observation, and document analysis, it reveals how weak institutions shape CSR, why conflicts with social movements emerge, and how discourse failure may persist. The research offers pathways for mitigation of conflicts.

Suggested Citation

  • Hajdu, Annamaria, 2024. "Institutional perspectives on corporate social responsibility (CSR) in agricultural enterprises amidst social movement debates," EconStor Theses, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 312787, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:esthes:312787
    DOI: 10.25673/118357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/312787/1/Hajdu_2024_corporate_social_responsibility.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.25673/118357?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esthes:312787. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.