IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/diestu/106.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Natural resource governance in light of the 2030 Agenda: The case of competition for groundwater in Azraq, Jordan

Author

Listed:
  • Dombrowsky, Ines
  • Hägele, Ramona
  • Behrenbeck, Lukas
  • Bollwein, Thomas
  • Köder, Mirjana
  • Oberhauser, Daniel
  • Schamberger, Ronja
  • Al-Naber, Majd
  • Al-Raggad, Marwan
  • Salameh, Elias

Abstract

This study analyses a complex social-ecological system (SES), the case of competition for groundwater in Azraq, in the light of the 2030 Agenda. Building on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework (IAD) and the concept of Networks of Adjacent Action Situations (NAAS) it assess the complex governance system in a consistent and systematic manner. It includes aspects of power through the political economy concept of the social contract. It furthermore assesses the performance of the investigated SES against the 2030 Agenda's core principles 'leaving no one behind', 'interconnectedness and indivisibility', 'multi-stakeholder partnerships', and 'inclusiveness'. The study finds that in Azraq, agricultural, domestic and environmental water users compete for shrinking groundwater resources. The core of the conflict lies between a heterogeneous group of farmers, who use groundwater for irrigation agriculture supported by a strong political lobby, and the water authorities, which rely on the aquifer for domestic water supply at national level. Water, agricultural, environmental, energy, and land governance, but also high-level decision-making and the monarchy's underlying social contract and the informal concept of wasta influence the outcomes on the ground. As a result, groundwater governance in Jordan hardly does justice to the 2030 Agenda's core principles. The study shows that no panacea exists, but that systems thinking may help identify a range of intervention points, some more sensitive than others, that could support a social-ecological transformation towards sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Dombrowsky, Ines & Hägele, Ramona & Behrenbeck, Lukas & Bollwein, Thomas & Köder, Mirjana & Oberhauser, Daniel & Schamberger, Ronja & Al-Naber, Majd & Al-Raggad, Marwan & Salameh, Elias, 2022. "Natural resource governance in light of the 2030 Agenda: The case of competition for groundwater in Azraq, Jordan," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 106, number 106, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:diestu:106
    DOI: 10.23661/is106.2022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/262365/1/1811674666.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.23661/is106.2022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barnett, Andy & Yandle, Bruce & Naufal, George, 2013. "Regulation, trust, and cronyism in Middle Eastern societies: The simple economics of “wasta”," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 41-46.
    2. Ines Dombrowsky, 2007. "Conflict, Cooperation and Institutions in International Water Management," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 12751.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hearn, Bruce & Oxelheim, Lars & Randøy, Trond, 2020. "The Impact of Indigenous Culture and Business Group Affiliation on Corporate Governance of African Firms," Working Paper Series 1360, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    2. Hansjürgens, Bernd, 2008. "Internationale Klimapolitik nach Kyoto: Architekturen und Institutionen," UFZ Discussion Papers 10/2008, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    3. Osman, Adam & Speer, Jamin D. & Weaver, Andrew, 2022. "Connections, Referrals, and Hiring Outcomes: Evidence from an Egyptian Establishment Survey," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 342-355.
    4. Abu Elnasr E. Sobaih & Ahmed E. Abu Elnasr, 2023. "Local versus Foreign Worker Perceptions, Commitment and Attitudes toward Careers in Restaurants and Cafés: Evidence from Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Dowling, Michael & Vanwalleghem, Dieter, 2018. "Gulf Cooperation Council cross-border M&A: Institutional determinants of target nation selection," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 471-489.
    6. Mark Wiering & Joris Verwijmeren, 2012. "Limits and Borders: Stages of Transboundary Water Management," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 257-272, December.
    7. Moustafa, Khaled, 2018. "Promoting an academic culture in the Arab world," arabixiv.org bcp5f, Center for Open Science.
    8. Rafael Emmanuel Macatangay & Alistair Rieu-Clarke, 2018. "The role of valuation and bargaining in optimising transboundary watercourse treaty regimes," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 409-428, June.
    9. Erik Ansink & Harold Houba, 2014. "The Economics of Transboundary River Management," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 14-132/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    10. Zhang, Man & Hartley, Janet L. & AL-Husan, Faten Baddar & ALHussan, Fawaz Baddar, 2021. "Informal interorganizational business relationships and customer loyalty: Comparing Guanxi, Yongo, and Wasta," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(3).
    11. Kittur, Prathamesh & Agarwal, Shailja, 2024. "Cultural bridges in Business: Critical review and future directions in cross-cultural B2B relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    12. Herrfahrdt-Pähle, Elke & Scheumann, Waltina & Houdret, Annabelle & Dombrowsky, Ines, 2019. "Freshwater as a global commons: International governance and the role of Germany," IDOS Discussion Papers 15/2019, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    13. Williams Colin C. & Yang Junhong, 2017. "Evaluating the Use of Personal Networks to Circumvent Formal Processes: A Case Study of Vruzki in Bulgaria," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 57-67, April.
    14. Ilkhom Soliev & Insa Theesfeld, 2017. "Reframing for Sustainability: Exploring Transformative Power of Benefit Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-23, August.
    15. Obeidat, Zaid Mohammad & Xiao, Sarah Hong & Qasem, Zainah al & dweeri, Rami al & Obeidat, Ahmad, 2018. "Social media revenge: A typology of online consumer revenge," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 239-255.
    16. Shaikha Khalfan, 2024. "Wasta in business management: a critical review of recent developments and future trends in the tourism sector," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    17. Patrick Gilman & Víctor Pochat & Ariel Dinar, 2008. "Whither La Plata? Assessing the state of transboundary water resource cooperation in the basin," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 32(3), pages 203-214, August.
    18. Xie, Yang & Zilberman, David, 2018. "Implications of Spatial Externality of Flood Control: Land Reclamation, Wetland Reservation, and Investment in Flood Control Facilities," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274445, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Tobias Renner & Sander Meijerink & Pieter Zaag & Toine Smits, 2021. "Assessment framework of actor strategies in international river basin management, the case of Deltarhine," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 255-283, June.
    20. Hany Abdel-Latif & Hassan Aly, 2019. "Are politically connected firms turtles or gazelles? Evidence from the Egyptian uprising," Working Papers 1304, Economic Research Forum, revised 2019.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:diestu:106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ditubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.