IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/wfo/wstudy/69445.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Transformation zur Kreislaufwirtschaft. Leistungsfähigkeit, industrie- und FTI-politische Förderung

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Reinstaller
  • Ina Meyer
  • Michael Peneder

Abstract

Die vorliegende Kurzstudie bietet Evidenz zu technologischen Entwicklungen in Österreich, die die Transformation zur Kreislaufwirtschaft unterstützen. Derartige Tätigkeiten spielen im österreichischen Innovationssystem – unter Berücksichtigung wichtiger Einschränkungen bei der Messung – sowohl in absoluten als auch in anteilsmäßigen Zahlen nur eine untergeordnete Rolle. Trotzdem sind technologisch und kommerziell relevante Entwicklungstätigkeiten zu beobachten. Eine Fallstudie zur Etablierung von Kreislaufwertschöpfungsketten im Bereich der Lithium-Ionen-Batterien zeigt die Bedeutung umfassender wirtschaftlicher, sozialer und FTI-politischer Ansätze, die für eine Transformation hin zu einer Kreislaufwirtschaft notwendig sind. In dem erforderlichen "whole of government"-Ansatz kann der Rat für Forschung und Technologieentwicklung eine wichtige Koordinationsrolle übernehmen.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Reinstaller & Ina Meyer & Michael Peneder, 2022. "Transformation zur Kreislaufwirtschaft. Leistungsfähigkeit, industrie- und FTI-politische Förderung," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 69445, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:69445
    Note: With English abstract.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/pubid/69445
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bronwyn H. Hall & Adam Jaffe & Manuel Trajtenberg, 2005. "Market Value and Patent Citations," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 36(1), pages 16-38, Spring.
    2. Kristoffersen, Eivind & Blomsma, Fenna & Mikalef, Patrick & Li, Jingyue, 2020. "The smart circular economy: A digital-enabled circular strategies framework for manufacturing companies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 241-261.
    3. Xavier Leflaive & Ben Krieble & Harry Smythe, 2020. "Trends in water-related technological innovation: Insights from patent data," OECD Environment Working Papers 161, OECD Publishing.
    4. Peter Beigl & Silvia Scherhaufer & Florian Part & Aleksander Jandric & Stefan Salhofer & Thomas Nigl & Michael Altendorfer & Bettina Rutrecht & Roland Pomberger & Ina Meyer & Mark Sommer, 2021. "Entwicklung einer Wertschöpfungskette für das Recycling von Lithium-Ionen-Batterien (LIB) in Österreich," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 67942.
    5. Kirchherr, Julian & Reike, Denise & Hekkert, Marko, 2017. "Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 221-232.
    6. Lybbert, Travis J. & Zolas, Nikolas J., 2014. "Getting patents and economic data to speak to each other: An ‘Algorithmic Links with Probabilities’ approach for joint analyses of patenting and economic activity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 530-542.
    7. David Lazarevic & Miguel Brandão, 2020. "The circular economy: a strategy to reconcile economic and environmental objectives?," Chapters, in: Miguel Brandão & David Lazarevic & Göran Finnveden (ed.), Handbook of the Circular Economy, chapter 2, pages 8-27, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Michael Peneder, 2017. "Competitiveness and industrial policy: from rationalities of failure towards the ability to evolve," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 41(3), pages 829-858.
    9. René Kemp, 2010. "Eco-innovation: Definition, Measurement and Open Research Issues," Economia politica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 397-420.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ross Levine & Chen Lin & Lai Wei, 2017. "Insider Trading and Innovation," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 60(4), pages 749-800.
    2. Hötte, Kerstin, 2023. "Demand-pull, technology-push, and the direction of technological change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(5).
    3. Alessandra Colombelli & Jackie Krafft & Francesco Quatraro, 2015. "Eco-innovation and Firm Growth: Do Green Gazelles Run Faster? Microeconometric Evidence from a Sample of European Firms. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 88," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 57897.
    4. Ahmad, Farhan & Bask, Anu & Laari, Sini & Robinson, Craig V., 2023. "Business management perspectives on the circular economy: Present state and future directions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    5. Gianmarco Bressanelli & Federico Adrodegari & Daniela C. A. Pigosso & Vinit Parida, 2022. "Towards the Smart Circular Economy Paradigm: A Definition, Conceptualization, and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Benoit, Florence & Belderbos, René, 2024. "International connection, local disconnection: The (heterogeneous) role of global cities in local and global innovation networks," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(3).
    7. Girod, Bastien & Stucki, Tobias & Woerter, Martin, 2017. "How do policies for efficient energy use in the household sector induce energy-efficiency innovation? An evaluation of European countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 223-237.
    8. Andrea Fosfuri & Christian Helmers & Catherine Roux, 2017. "Shared Ownership of Intangible Property Rights: The Case of Patent Coassignments," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 46(2), pages 339-369.
    9. Altaf Hossain Molla & Hilal Shams & Zambri Harun & Mohd Nizam Ab Rahman & Hawa Hishamuddin, 2022. "An Assessment of Drivers and Barriers to Implementation of Circular Economy in the End-of-Life Vehicle Recycling Sector in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-25, October.
    10. Stephen D Billington & Alan J Hanna, 2021. "That’s classified! Inventing a new patent taxonomy [Text matching to measure patent similarity]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(3), pages 678-705.
    11. Alessandra Neri & Marta Negri & Enrico Cagno & Vikas Kumar & Jose Arturo Garza‐Reyes, 2023. "What digital‐enabled dynamic capabilities support the circular economy? A multiple case study approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 5083-5101, November.
    12. René Belderbos & Jinhyuck (Joseph) Park & Martin Carree, 2021. "Do R&D investments in weak IPR countries destroy market value? The role of internal linkages," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(8), pages 1401-1431, August.
    13. Pieter E. Stek, 2021. "Identifying spatial technology clusters from patenting concentrations using heat map kernel density estimation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 911-930, February.
    14. Julia Romano Sanches & Adriana Hofmann Trevisan & Bruno Michel Roman Pais Seles & Camila Gonçalves Castro & Roberta Souza Piao & Henrique Rozenfeld & Janaina Mascarenhas, 2022. "Sustainable Circular Economy Strategies: An Analysis of Brazilian Corporate Sustainability Reporting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-26, May.
    15. Barbieri, Nicolò & Marzucchi, Alberto & Rizzo, Ugo, 2023. "Green technologies, interdependencies, and policy," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    16. Stucki, Tobias & Woerter, Martin, 2019. "The private returns to knowledge: A comparison of ICT, biotechnologies, nanotechnologies, and green technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 62-81.
    17. Claudia Arias & Jhon Mario Quiroga Beltrán & Javier Mauricio Martínez Ariza & Javier Bernardo Cadena Lozano & Miguel Angel Bello Bernal, 2022. "Pro-Circular Consumer Profile: An Approach to Their Identification and Characterization Based on the Components of the Value-Belief-Norm Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-36, June.
    18. Raysa Geaquinto Rocha & Arminda do Paço & Helena Alves & Pedro Dinis Gaspar, 2023. "The Portuguese Circular Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: Experts Advice on How to Overcome the Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, March.
    19. William, Mbanyele & Fengrong, Wang, 2022. "Economic policy uncertainty and industry innovation: Cross country evidence," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 208-228.
    20. François Lafond & Daniel Kim, 2019. "Long-run dynamics of the U.S. patent classification system," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 631-664, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:69445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Mayr (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wifooat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.