IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/ucp/bkecon/9780226436227.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Actively Seeking Work?

Author

Listed:
  • King, Desmond

Abstract

Why have both Great Britain and the United States been unable to create effective training and work programs for the unemployed? Desmond King contends that the answer lies in the liberal political origins of these programs. Integrating extensive, previously untapped archival and documentary materials with an analysis of the sources of political support for work-welfare programs, King shows that policymakers in both Great Britain and the United States have tried to achieve conflicting goals through these programs. The goal of work-welfare policy in both countries has been to provide financial aid, training, and placement services for the unemployed. In order to muster support for these programs, however, work-welfare programs had to incorporate liberal requirements that they not interfere with private market forces, and that they prevent the "undeserving" from obtaining benefits. For King, the attempt to integrate these incompatible functions is the defining feature of British and American policies as well as the cause of their failure.

Suggested Citation

  • King, Desmond, 1995. "Actively Seeking Work?," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 1, number 9780226436227, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:bkecon:9780226436227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Myra Hamilton, 2014. "The 'new social contract' and the individualisation of risk in policy," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 453-467, April.
    2. Füsun Kökalan Çımrın & Zafer Durdu, 2017. "Indirect welfare regime practices and transformation of social security system of Turkey after 1980," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 2781-2792, November.
    3. David Etherington & Martin Jones, 2009. "City-Regions: New Geographies of Uneven Development and Inequality," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 247-265.
    4. Martin Jones, 1997. "Skills Revolution? Sorry, Wrong Number," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 11(4), pages 290-298, February.
    5. repec:aia:aiaswp:wp50 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Dingeldey, Irene, 2005. "Welfare state transformation between workfare and an enabling state: a comparative analysis," TranState Working Papers 21, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    7. Obinger, Herbert & Starke, Peter, 2014. "Welfare state transformation: Convergence and the rise of the supply side model," TranState Working Papers 180, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    8. J Mohan & M Chisholm & D Simon & R Cybriwsky, 1996. "Reviews: Review Essay: The State We're in, a New Social Atlas of Britain, the British Economy in Transition. From the Old to the New?, Patterns of Development: Resources, Policy and Economic Growth, P," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 28(8), pages 1519-1528, August.
    9. Gianluca Misuraca & Giulio Pasi & Fabienne Abadie & Csaba Kucsera & Marco Virginillo, 2017. "Exploring the role of ICT-Enabled Social Innovation to support the modernisation of EU Social Protection Systems: findings and insights from analysis of case studies in fourteen Member States," JRC Research Reports JRC106484, Joint Research Centre.
    10. Veldboer, Lex & Kleinhans, Reinout & van Ham, Maarten, 2015. "Mandatory Volunteer Work as Fair Reciprocity for Unemployment and Social Benefits?," IZA Discussion Papers 9111, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Vivien Lowndes, 2001. "Rescuing Aunt Sally: Taking Institutional Theory Seriously in Urban Politics," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(11), pages 1953-1971, October.
    12. J Peck & M Jones, 1995. "Training and Enterprise Councils: Schumpeterian Workfare State, or What?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 27(9), pages 1361-1396, September.
    13. Matthew Cooper, 2021. "‘21st Century Welfare’ in Historical Perspective: Disciplinary Welfare in the Depression of the 1930s and Its Implications for Today," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 26(2), pages 326-342, June.
    14. Cathie Jo Martin & Jette Steen Knudsen, 2010. "Scenes from a mall: Retail training and the social exclusion of low‐skilled workers," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(3), pages 345-364, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:bkecon:9780226436227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Books Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://press.uchicago.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.