IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/ext/derech/893.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

La conciliación en el derecho administrativo colombiano

Author

Listed:
  • Véronica Peláez Gutiérrez

Abstract

Colombia ha conocido un periodo de transformación institucional y jurídica desde la expedición de la Constitución de 1991. Fue con dicho texto normativo que se confirió rango constitucional a la conciliación, y es en ese contexto con el que comienza el desarrollo reciente de la misma y se ha manifestado la voluntad del gobierno nacional y del legislativo mediante las diferentes normas expedidas con el fin de promover su utilización. Ahora bien, a pesar de que la conciliación en el derecho administrativo colombiano se encuentra regulada por la normatividad en vigor, su eficacia no ha sido garantizada. Factores externos al propio mecanismo como, por ejemplo, los vacíos normativos existentes, las interpretaciones algunas veces desafortunadas de los textos normativos, la falta de compresión del mecanismo por parte de los intervinientes, así como las formalidades a las cuales está sometida su utilización, y la corrupción, han afectado directamente el funcionamiento de la conciliación en el derecho administrativo y su eficacia. Hoy, después de casi 26 años de consagración constitucional, este libro busca abordar la conciliación desde un punto de vista crítico, con el fin de analizar sus bondades no solo como mecanismo que permite resolver por fuera de los estrados judiciales los conflictos sino como un mecanismo cuya eficacia debe ser garantizada con el fin de promover y asegurar el principio de participación, de igual manera, la paz, la tranquilidad, la armonía en las relaciones sociales y la justicia social, tan necesarias en nuestro país. Las reflexiones que en esta obra se realizan sobre la conciliación van más allá de su simple análisis normativo y buscan ante todo crear en el lector una visión amplia de la conciliación, de su importancia, de la necesidad de reformas normativas, de políticas públicas adecuadas y de la construcción de una cultura a favor de su utilización en el derecho administrativo, la cual no se ha consolidado en Colombia y que es absolutamente necesaria para lograr su eficacia.

Suggested Citation

  • Véronica Peláez Gutiérrez, 2016. "La conciliación en el derecho administrativo colombiano," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 893, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:ext:derech:893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publicaciones.uexternado.edu.co
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oriana Bandiera & Andrea Prat & Tommaso Valletti, 2009. "Active and Passive Waste in Government Spending: Evidence from a Policy Experiment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(4), pages 1278-1308, September.
    2. Ramiro Bejarano Guzmán (Dir.), 2012. "Código General del Proceso y Código de Procedimiento Civil. Cuadro comparativo," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, edition 1, volume 1, number 593, October.
    3. Jaime Orlando Santofimio Gamboa, 2004. "Tratado de Derecho Administrativo," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, edition 1, volume 3, number 40, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maximiliano Rodríguez Fernández, 2016. "Introducción al derecho comercial internacional," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 892, October.
    2. Francesco Decarolis & Raymond Fisman & Paolo Pinotti & Silvia Vannutelli, 2019. "Rules, Discretion, and Corruption in Procurement: Evidence from Italian Government Contracting," Boston University - Department of Economics - The Institute for Economic Development Working Papers Series dp-344, Boston University - Department of Economics.
    3. Stephan Litschig, 2008. "Financing local development: Quasi-experimental evidence from municipalities in Brazil, 1980-1991," Economics Working Papers 1142, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Jun 2012.
    4. Galletta, Sergio, 2017. "Law enforcement, municipal budgets and spillover effects: Evidence from a quasi-experiment in Italy," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 90-105.
    5. Claudia Allende & Juan Pablo Atal & Rodrigo Carril & José Ignacio Cuesta & Andres Gonzalez-Lira, 2023. "Drivers of Public Procurement Prices: Evidence from Pharmaceutical Markets," Working Papers 1413, Barcelona School of Economics.
    6. Lambsdorff, Johann Graf & Grubiak, Kevin & Werner, Katharina, 2023. "Intrinsic Motivation vs. Corruption? Experimental Evidence on the Performance of Officials," MPRA Paper 118153, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Sümeyra Atmaca & Elena Podkolzina & Koen Schoors, 2019. "Corrupt Reserve Prices," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 19/961, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    8. Matilde Cappelletti & Leonardo M. Giuffrida, 2024. "Targeted Bidders in Government Tenders," CESifo Working Paper Series 11142, CESifo.
    9. Isabella Giorgetti & Matteo Picchio, 2021. "One billion euro programme for early childcare services in Italy," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(3), pages 460-492, July.
    10. Butler, Jeffrey V. & Carbone, Enrica & Conzo, Pierluigi & Spagnolo, Giancarlo, 2020. "Past performance and entry in procurement: An experimental investigation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 179-195.
    11. Florence Kondylis & Mattea Stein, 2023. "The Speed of Justice," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 105(3), pages 596-613, May.
    12. Erica Bosio & Simeon Djankov & Edward Glaeser & Andrei Shleifer, 2022. "Public Procurement in Law and Practice," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(4), pages 1091-1117, April.
    13. Cavalcanti, Francisco & Daniele, Gianmarco & Galletta, Sergio, 2018. "Popularity shocks and political selection," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 201-216.
    14. Auriol, Emmanuelle & Straub, Stéphane & Flochel, Thomas, 2016. "Public Procurement and Rent-Seeking: The Case of Paraguay," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 395-407.
    15. Zamboni, Yves & Litschig, Stephan, 2018. "Audit risk and rent extraction: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in Brazil," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 133-149.
    16. Clarissa Lotti & Arieda Muço & Giancarlo Spagnolo & Tommaso Valletti, 2024. "Indirect Savings from Public Procurement Centralization," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 16(3), pages 347-366, August.
    17. Bergman, Mats A. & Johansson, Per & Lundberg, Sofia & Spagnolo, Giancarlo, 2016. "Privatization and quality: Evidence from elderly care in Sweden," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 109-119.
    18. Jian Chu & Raymond Fisman & Songtao Tan & Yongxiang Wang, 2021. "Hometown Ties and the Quality of Government Monitoring: Evidence from Rotation of Chinese Auditors," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 13(3), pages 176-201, July.
    19. Ferraz, Claudio & Finan, Frederico S., 2007. "Electoral Accountability and Corruption in Local Governments: Evidence from Audit Reports," IZA Discussion Papers 2843, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    20. Dina Pomeranz & José Vila-Belda, 2019. "Taking State-Capacity Research to the Field: Insights from Collaborations with Tax Authorities," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 755-781, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ext:derech:893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Carolina Esguerra (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.uexternado.edu.co/derecho .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.