IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/era/eriabk/2015-rpr-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Institutional Policy and Economic Impacts of Energy Subsidies Removal in East Asia

Editor

Listed:
  • Han Phoumin
  • Shigeru Kimura

Author

Listed:
  • Han Phoumin
  • Shigeru Kimura

Abstract

This study explores the impact of energy subsidies and provides policy recommendations to gradually phase out energy subsidies in the East Asia Summit (EAS) region. Fossil fuel subsidies amounted to about $51 billion in Southeast Asia for 2012 alone (ERIA and IEA, 2013). They encourage wasteful energy use; burden government budgets; defer investment in energy infrastructure and efficient technology; and further undermine renewable energy uptake. While some ASEAN countries have taken action to remove energy subsidies, such action, which is often politically sensitive, must be accompanied by careful strategy and steps. Energy subsidies are important if they are well targeted for people who need energy to survive and to improve their well-being. For example, fossil-fuel subsidies improve the living conditions of the poor by making fuel for cooking and heating more affordable. However, most are often blanket subsidies, which benefit the rich rather than the poor. Blanket energy subsidies incentivise consumption and can result in increased energy demand. However, inefficient subsidies can lead to fiscal pressure, harmful emissions, and potentially undermine sustainable green growth in EAS countries. Reduced energy subsidies will encourage more energy-efficient consumption, leading to a positive impact on international energy prices and energy security, and will make renewable energy and technologies more competitive. It further benefits the environment and society by reducing local pollution and cutting greenhouse gas emissions.

Individual chapters are listed in the "Chapters" tab

Suggested Citation

  • Han Phoumin & Shigeru Kimura, 2017. "Institutional Policy and Economic Impacts of Energy Subsidies Removal in East Asia," Books, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA), number 2015-rpr-23 edited by Han Phoumin & Shigeru Kimura, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:era:eriabk:2015-rpr-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eria.org/RPR_FY2015_23.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank, 2008. "Climate Change and the World Bank Group - Phase I : An Evaluation of World Bank Win-Win Energy Policy Reforms," World Bank Publications - Reports 10594, The World Bank Group.
    2. Gangopadhyay, Shubhashis & Ramaswami, Bharat & Wadhwa, Wilima, 2005. "Reducing subsidies on household fuels in India: how will it affect the poor?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(18), pages 2326-2336, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sangeeta V. Sharma & Vinod K. Sharma, 2017. "Socio-economic Impacts of an LPG Subsidy Removal on the Household Sector in India," Chapters, in: Han Phoumin & Shigeru Kimura (ed.), Institutional Policy and Economic Impacts of Energy Subsidies Removal in East Asia, chapter 5, pages 83-99, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    2. Acharya, Rajesh H. & Sadath, Anver C., 2017. "Implications of energy subsidy reform in India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 453-462.
    3. Wang, Yanxiang & Ali Almazrooei, Shaikha & Kapsalyamova, Zhanna & Diabat, Ali & Tsai, I-Tsung, 2016. "Utility subsidy reform in Abu Dhabi: A review and a Computable General Equilibrium analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1352-1362.
    4. Shan Zhou & Douglas S. Noonan, 2019. "Justice Implications of Clean Energy Policies and Programs in the United States: A Theoretical and Empirical Exploration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Cathrine Hagem & Halvor Briseid Storrøsten, 2019. "Supply‐ versus Demand‐Side Policies in the Presence of Carbon Leakage and the Green Paradox," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 121(1), pages 379-406, January.
    6. Iuliia Ogarenko & Klaus Hubacek, 2013. "Eliminating Indirect Energy Subsidies in Ukraine: Estimation of Environmental and Socioeconomic Effects Using Input–Output Modeling," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 2(1), pages 1-27, December.
    7. Balachandra, P. & Kristle Nathan, Hippu Salk & Reddy, B. Sudhakara, 2010. "Commercialization of sustainable energy technologies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 1842-1851.
    8. International Monetary Fund, 2008. "India: Selected Issues," IMF Staff Country Reports 2008/052, International Monetary Fund.
    9. Khalid, Syed Adnan & Salman, Verda, 2020. "“Welfare impact of electricity subsidy reforms in Pakistan: A micro model study”," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    10. Yawale, Satish Kumar & Hanaoka, Tatsuya & Kapshe, Manmohan & Pandey, Rahul, 2023. "End-use energy projections: Future regional disparity and energy poverty at the household level in rural and urban areas of India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    11. Rajesh Kalli & Pradyot Ranjan Jena & Shunsuke Managi, 2022. "Subsidized LPG Scheme and the Shift to Cleaner Household Energy Use: Evidence from a Tribal Community of Eastern India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Solaymani, Saeed & Kari, Fatimah, 2014. "Impacts of energy subsidy reform on the Malaysian economy and transportation sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 115-125.
    13. Rehman, I.H. & Kar, Abhishek & Banerjee, Manjushree & Kumar, Preeth & Shardul, Martand & Mohanty, Jeevan & Hossain, Ijaz, 2012. "Understanding the political economy and key drivers of energy access in addressing national energy access priorities and policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(S1), pages 27-37.
    14. Bazilian, Morgan & Onyeji, Ijeoma, 2012. "Fossil fuel subsidy removal and inadequate public power supply: Implications for businesses," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 1-5.
    15. Pani, Marco & Perroni, Carlo, 2018. "Energy subsidies and policy commitment in political equilibrium," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 149-160.
    16. B. Sudhkara Reddy & Hippu Salk Kristle Nathan, 2010. "Energy infrastructure for a high humane and low corbon future," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2010-007, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
    17. van Ruijven, Bas J. & van Vuuren, Detlef P. & de Vries, Bert J.M. & Isaac, Morna & van der Sluijs, Jeroen P. & Lucas, Paul L. & Balachandra, P., 2011. "Model projections for household energy use in India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(12), pages 7747-7761.
    18. Aryanpur, Vahid & Fattahi, Mahshid & Mamipour, Siab & Ghahremani, Mahsa & Gallachóir, Brian Ó & Bazilian, Morgan D. & Glynn, James, 2022. "How energy subsidy reform can drive the Iranian power sector towards a low-carbon future," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    19. Lin, Boqiang & Jiang, Zhujun, 2011. "Estimates of energy subsidies in China and impact of energy subsidy reform," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 273-283, March.
    20. Yaqoot, Mohammed & Diwan, Parag & Kandpal, Tara C., 2015. "Public financing of solar lanterns versus subsidizing kerosene for domestic lighting in India: A feasibility assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 564-572.

    Book Chapters

    The following chapters of this book are listed in IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:era:eriabk:2015-rpr-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ranti Amelia The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Ranti Amelia to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eriadid.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.