IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/ces/ifofob/115.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Traffic Effects of a Congestion Charge in Munich

Author

Listed:
  • Oliver Falck
  • Anita Dietrich
  • Astrid Janko
  • Tobias Kluth
  • Anita Wölfl

Abstract

Currently, Munich is one of the cities in Europe with the highest level of congestion. The present study empirically examines the effects of the pricing of moving and station-ary road traffic in Munich. The main result of the study is that a simply designed anti-congestion charge could significantly reduce congestion problems in Munich’s inner city. On the other hand, increasing the existing parking fees in the parking license areas to €10 per day would have practically no traffic-directing effect. However, if the higher parking fees were combined with a daily fee of €6 for flowing traffic, car traffic on the Mittlerer Ring could be reduced by more than 23% on average over the entire day, and by 33% at peak times. A fee of €10 per day would have even greater effects. The traffic-directing effect is mainly due to the fact that if an anti-congestion charge were introduced drivers would switch to other means of transport, especial-ly public transport. Nonetheless, the number of trips to the city centre by all means of transport would decrease only slightly. Less car traffic would significantly reduce road congestion, which would also benefit commercial traffic: Here, the travel time on the Mittlerer Ring would be reduced by 7.5% and in peak times even by more than 10%.

Suggested Citation

  • Oliver Falck & Anita Dietrich & Astrid Janko & Tobias Kluth & Anita Wölfl, 2020. "Traffic Effects of a Congestion Charge in Munich," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 115, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifofob:115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifo_Forschungsberichte_115_Anti-Stau-Gebuehr.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eliasson, Jonas, 2014. "The Stockholm congestion charges: an overview," Working papers in Transport Economics 2014:7, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).
    2. Gibson, Matthew & Carnovale, Maria, 2015. "The effects of road pricing on driver behavior and air pollution," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 62-73.
    3. Börjesson, Maria & Eliasson, Jonas & Hugosson, Muriel & Brundell-Freij, Karin, 2012. "The Stockholm congestion charges – five years on. Effects, acceptability and lessons learnt," Working papers in Transport Economics 2012:3, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).
    4. Shoup, Donald, 2007. "Cruising for Parking," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt6sn7s1x2, University of California Transportation Center.
    5. Jonathan Leape, 2006. "The London Congestion Charge," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 20(4), pages 157-176, Fall.
    6. Puls, Thomas, 2008. "Stadtverkehr im Fokus: Ist eine City-Maut die Lösung der Stauprobleme?," IW-Analysen, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute, volume 37, number 37.
    7. RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (Ed.) & Stiftung Mercator (Ed.), 2019. "Weniger Staus, Staub und Gestank per sozial ausgewogener Städte-Maut: Gemeinsames Plädoyer initiiert von RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung und der Stiftung Mercator," RWI Positionen 74, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
    8. Edoardo Croci & Aldo Ravazzi Douvan, 2016. "Urban Road Pricing: A Comparative Study on the Experiences of London, Stockholm and Milan," IEFE Working Papers 85, IEFE, Center for Research on Energy and Environmental Economics and Policy, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    9. Georgina Santos & David Newbery, 2001. "Urban Congestion Charging: Theory, Practice and Environmental Consequences," CESifo Working Paper Series 568, CESifo.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schwarz, Gregor & Bichler, Martin, 2022. "How to trade thirty thousand products: A wholesale market design for road capacity," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 167-185.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Baranzini & Stefano Carattini & Linda Tesauro, 2021. "Designing Effective and Acceptable Road Pricing Schemes: Evidence from the Geneva Congestion Charge," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 79(3), pages 417-482, July.
    2. Helmers, Viola & Frondel, Manuel & Sommer, Stephan, 2023. "On the Acceptance of Congestion Charges: Experimental Evidence for Six European Countries," VfS Annual Conference 2023 (Regensburg): Growth and the "sociale Frage" 277706, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    3. Lehe, Lewis J., 2017. "Downtown tolls and the distribution of trip lengths," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 11, pages 23-32.
    4. Lehe, Lewis J. & Devunuri, Saipraneeth, 2022. "Large Elasticity at Introduction," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    5. Daniel Albalate & Xavier Fageda, 2019. "Congestion, Road Safety, and the Effectiveness of Public Policies in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Lana Krehic, 2022. "How do increases in electric vehicle use affect urban toll ring prices?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 193(3), pages 187-209, December.
    7. Rødseth, Kenneth Løvold & Wangsness, Paal Brevik & Alexander Gregersen, Fredrik, 2024. "Panel data analysis of drivers under an evolving cordon tolling system," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    8. De Vos, Jonas, 2016. "Road pricing in a polycentric urban region: Analysing a pilot project in Belgium," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 134-142.
    9. Daganzo, Carlos F & Lehe, Lewis, 2016. "Zone Pricing in Theory and Practice," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt39f0v6kq, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    10. Nelson, Sarah & Allwood, Julian M., 2021. "The technological and social timelines of climate mitigation: Lessons from 12 past transitions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    11. Wes Austin & Stefano Carattini & John Gomez Mahecha & Michael Pesko, 2020. "Covid-19 Mortality and Contemporaneous Air Pollution," CESifo Working Paper Series 8609, CESifo.
    12. Mohamad Shatanawi & Fatma Abdelkhalek & Ferenc Mészáros, 2020. "Urban Congestion Charging Acceptability: An International Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, June.
    13. Ben-Dor, Golan & Ogulenko, Aleksey & Klein, Ido & Ben-Elia, Eran & Benenson, Itzhak, 2024. "Simulation-based policy evaluation of monetary car driving disincentives in Jerusalem," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    14. Green, Colin P. & Heywood, John S. & Navarro Paniagua, Maria, 2020. "Did the London congestion charge reduce pollution?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    15. Linn, Joshua & Wang, Zhongmin & Xie, Lunyu, 2016. "Who will be affected by a congestion pricing scheme in Beijing?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 34-40.
    16. Fageda, Xavier & Flores-Fillol, Ricardo & Theilen, Bernd, 2022. "Price versus quantity measures to deal with pollution and congestion in urban areas: A political economy approach," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    17. Axsen, Jonn & Wolinetz, Michael, 2021. "Taxes, tolls and ZEV zones for climate: Synthesizing insights on effectiveness, efficiency, equity, acceptability and implementation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    18. De Borger, Bruno & Glazer, Amihai, 2017. "Support and opposition to a Pigovian tax: Road pricing with reference-dependent preferences," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 31-47.
    19. Wang, Chu & Xu, Jintao, 2020. "The Effect of a Congestion Charge on Traffic: The Case of London," EfD Discussion Paper 20-11, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    20. Foreman, Kate, 2016. "Crossing the bridge: The effects of time-varying tolls on curbing congestion," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 76-94.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifofob:115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.