IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/ces/ifofob/103.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Europäischer Austeritätsdiskurs: Was bedeutet „Austerität“? Wie wird der Begriff in öffentlichen und wissenschaftlichen Debatten verwendet?

Author

Listed:
  • Klaus Gründler
  • Niklas Potrafke

Abstract

Studie im Auftrag der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. Der Begriff „Austerität" wird seit der Finanzkrise in Deutschland und Europa verstärkt im öffentlichen und wissenschaftlichen Diskurs verwendet. In der wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Literatur wird der Begriff „Austerität" schwerpunktmäßig in heterodoxen Zeitschriften verwendet. Der inhaltlich verwandte Ausdruck „fiskalische Konsolidierung" ist weniger ideologisch konnotiert und wird verstärkt im ökonomischen Mainstream gebraucht. Es existiert kein Konsens darüber, was „Austerität" bedeutet. Entsprechend unklar ist ebenso, welche Perioden als austeritär klassifiziert werden sollen. Trotz großer finanzieller Belastungen, welche den öffentlichen Budgets in verschiedenen Ländern insbesondere im Süden Europas aufgebürdet wurden, decken sich als „Austerität" klassifizierte Perioden häufig mit Phasen, in denen gegen die MaastrichtKriterien verstoßen wurde. Die Uneinigkeit über den Begriff „Austerität" schlägt sich in wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Studien über die Auswirkungen von „Austerität" nieder: Ja nach Definition korreliert Austerität entweder positiv oder negativ mit Wirtschaftswachstum. Für die Zukunft ist weitere Forschung notwendig, die aufzeigt, mit welchen fiskalpolitischen Mitteln (insbesondere im Hinblick auf die Budgetzusammensetzung) Haushaltskonsolidierung betrieben wurden und wie Verschuldung und individuelle Budgetpositionen mit Wirtschaftswachstum korreliert sind.

Suggested Citation

  • Klaus Gründler & Niklas Potrafke, 2019. "Europäischer Austeritätsdiskurs: Was bedeutet „Austerität“? Wie wird der Begriff in öffentlichen und wissenschaftlichen Debatten verwendet?," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 103.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifofob:103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifo_Forschungsberichte_103_2019_Austeritaet.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian Zimmermann, 2013. "Academic Rankings with RePEc," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-32, December.
    2. Yang, Weonho & Fidrmuc, Jan & Ghosh, Sugata, 2015. "Macroeconomic effects of fiscal adjustment: A tale of two approaches," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 31-60.
    3. Niklas Potrafke & Markus Reischmann, 2015. "Fiscal Transfers and Fiscal Sustainability," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 47(5), pages 975-1005, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Klaus Gründler & Niklas Potrafke, 2019. "Ideologically-charged terminology: austerity, fiscal consolidation, and sustainable governance," CESifo Working Paper Series 7613, CESifo.
    2. Klaus Wohlrabe, 2018. "Einige Anmerkungen zum FAZ-Ökonomenranking 2018," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 71(20), pages 29-33, October.
    3. Katharina Rath & Klaus Wohlrabe, 2016. "Recent trends in co-authorship in economics: evidence from RePEc," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(12), pages 897-902, August.
    4. António Afonso & José Alves, 2023. "Are fiscal consolidation episodes helpful for public sector efficiency?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(31), pages 3547-3560, July.
    5. Klaus Wohlrabe, 2014. "Eine Kritik des FAZ-Ökonomenrankings 2013," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 67(13), pages 63-67, July.
    6. Dilla, Diana, 2017. "Staatsverschuldung und Verschuldungsmentalität [Public Debt and Debt Mentality]," MPRA Paper 79432, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. R.D. Asanka Maithreerathna & P. Chamika Mummullage & Athula Naranpanawa & Chandika Gunasinghe, 2019. "An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Total Debt on the Economic Growth of Sri Lanka," Discussion Papers in Economics economics:201903, Griffith University, Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics.
    8. Lars P. Feld & Ekkehard A. Köhler & Julia Wolfinger, 2020. "Modeling fiscal sustainability in dynamic macro-panels with heterogeneous effects: evidence from German federal states," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 27(1), pages 215-239, February.
    9. David L. Anderson & John Tressler, 2009. "The Excellence in Research for Australia Scheme: An Evaluation of the Draft Journal Weights for Economics," Working Papers in Economics 09/07, University of Waikato.
    10. Adrian Chadi & Matthias Krapf, 2017. "The Protestant Fiscal Ethic: Religious Confession And Euro Skepticism In Germany," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 55(4), pages 1813-1832, October.
    11. Niklas Potrafke & Markus Reischmann, 2014. "Die Target-Forderungen der Deutschen Bundesbank: Eine Zeitreihenanalyse," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 67(14), pages 31-34, July.
    12. Thibault Lemaire, 2020. "Fiscal Consolidations and Informality in Latin America and the Caribbean," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 20004, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    13. Orazbayev, Sultan, 2017. "Exploring the world of Economics through RePEc data," MPRA Paper 81963, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Matthias Aistleitner & Jakob Kapeller & Stefan Steinerberger, 2018. "Citation Patterns in Economics and Beyond," Working Papers Series 85, Institute for New Economic Thinking.
    15. Chih-Sheng Hsieh & Michael König & Xiaodong Liu & Christian Zimmermann, 2020. "Collaboration in Bipartite Networks, with an Application to Coauthorship Networks," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 20-056/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    16. António Afonso & Frederico Silva Leal, 2022. "Fiscal episodes in the Economic and Monetary Union: Elasticities and non‐Keynesian effects," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 571-593, January.
    17. Etienne Farvaque & Frédéric Gannon, 2018. "Profiling giants: the networks and influence of Buchanan and Tullock," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 277-302, June.
    18. Sarah Brown & Alexandros Kontonikas & Alberto Montagnoli & Mirko Moro & Luisanna Onnis, 2018. "Austerity, Life Satisfaction and Expectations," Working Papers 2018001, The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics.
    19. Rodrigo Dorantes-Gilardi & Aurora A. Ramírez-Álvarez & Diana Terrazas-Santamaría, 2023. "Is there a differentiated gender effect of collaboration with super-cited authors? Evidence from junior researchers in economics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(4), pages 2317-2336, April.
    20. Antonio García-Romero & Daniel Santín & Gabriela Sicilia, 2016. "Another brick in the wall: a new ranking of academic journals in Economics using FDH," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(1), pages 91-101, April.

    More about this item

    Lists

    This item is featured on the following reading lists, Wikipedia, or ReplicationWiki pages:
    1. Papers using RePEc data

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifofob:103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.