IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zib/zbnees/v6y2022i2p94-100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment Of Potentially Toxic Metals And Nutrients From Contaminated Soil, Edible Plants, And Lake Sediments: A Case Study Of Hattar Industrial Estate Haripur, Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Faridullah

    (Department of Environment science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad Campus 22060, Pakistan)

  • Tahir Asma

    (Institute of Geological Survey, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Khan Junaid

    (China Geological Survey, Wuhan Center, 430205 Hubei, China)

  • Hua-Zhou Yao

    (Institute of Geological Survey, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Yasin Rahim

    (Peking University, Beijing 100871 China)

  • Amna Sarwar

    (Department of Environment science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad Campus 22060, Pakistan.)

  • Ismail Shah

    (School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Raja Zakir-Zahid

    (Department of Environment science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad Campus 22060, Pakistan.)

Abstract

An agricultural field located in the vicinity of the Hattar industrial Estate irrigates with industrial wastewater containing potentially toxic metals and excessive nutrients. In this study, onion field soil, wheat field soil, and edible parts of the wheat and onion were sampled from the field irrigated with long-term industrial wastewater to evaluate the potentially toxic metals (Cr, Cd, Ni, Fe, Zn, Hg, Cu) and excessive nutrients (K, Ca, Mg). Lake sediments were also sampled to examine the effects on polluted soil and edible plants. The results indicate that concentration level of potentially toxic metals are high in the soil and nutrients in the sediment. The plant component study shows that potentially toxic metals and nutrients are maximum in onion (root vegetable) than in wheat. During analysis of sediment’s effects on contaminated soil and spinach, it was concluded that potentially toxic metals were very high in spinach of contaminated soil than in sediments amended soil, while nutrients were high in sediments amended soil. A leafy part of spinach was more vulnerable to the accumulation of potentially toxic metals than other parts. The column leaching experiment shows that the concentration of metals and availability of nutrients in sediments amended soil is higher than in contaminated soil due to less uptake of nutrients and potentially toxic metals by spinach. It is concluded that sediments are suitable in polluted soil for reducing potentially toxic metals and excessive nutrient uptake by edible plants.

Suggested Citation

  • Faridullah & Tahir Asma & Khan Junaid & Hua-Zhou Yao & Yasin Rahim & Amna Sarwar & Ismail Shah & Raja Zakir-Zahid, 2022. "Assessment Of Potentially Toxic Metals And Nutrients From Contaminated Soil, Edible Plants, And Lake Sediments: A Case Study Of Hattar Industrial Estate Haripur, Pakistan," Environment & Ecosystem Science (EES), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 6(2), pages 94-100, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:zib:zbnees:v:6:y:2022:i:2:p:94-100
    DOI: 10.26480/ees.02.2022.94.100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://environecosystem.com/archives/2ees2022/2ees2022-94-100.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26480/ees.02.2022.94.100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carr, Gemma & Potter, Robert B. & Nortcliff, Stephen, 2011. "Water reuse for irrigation in Jordan: Perceptions of water quality among farmers," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(5), pages 847-854, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dimitra Lazaridou & Anastasios Michailidis & Konstantinos Mattas, 2019. "Evaluating the Willingness to Pay for Using Recycled Water for Irrigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-8, September.
    2. Winfrida Mayilla & Bernard Keraita & Helena Ngowi & Flemming Konradsen & Flavianus Magayane, 2017. "Perceptions of using low-quality irrigation water in vegetable production in Morogoro, Tanzania," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 165-183, February.
    3. Desta Woldetsadik & Pay Drechsel & Bernard Keraita & Fisseha Itanna & Heluf Gebrekidan, 2018. "Farmers’ perceptions on irrigation water contamination, health risks and risk management measures in prominent wastewater-irrigated vegetable farming sites of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 52-64, March.
    4. Ben Brahim-Neji, Hella & Ruiz-Villaverde, Alberto & González-Gómez, Francisco, 2014. "Decision aid supports for evaluating agricultural water reuse practices in Tunisia: The Cebala perimeter," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 113-121.
    5. Ricart, Sandra & Rico, Antonio M., 2019. "Assessing technical and social driving factors of water reuse in agriculture: A review on risks, regulation and the yuck factor," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 426-439.
    6. Abdelradi, Fadi & Ewiss, Mohamed A. Zaki & Guesmi, Bouali, 2017. "Attitudes Toward the Use of Treated Wastewater: A Survey of the Rural Population in Egypt," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 261113, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Wichelns, Dennis & Qadir, Manzoor, 2015. "Achieving sustainable irrigation requires effective management of salts, soil salinity, and shallow groundwater," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 31-38.
    8. Sandra Ricart & Anna Ribas & David Pavón, 2016. "Qualifying irrigation system sustainability by means of stakeholder perceptions and concerns: lessons from the Segarra‐Garrigues Canal, Spain," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(1-2), pages 77-90, February.
    9. Erez Braude & Shmuel Hauser & Zilla Sinuany-Stern & Gideon Oron, 2015. "Water Allocation Between the Agricultural and the Municipal Sectors Under Scarcity: A Financial Approach Analysis," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(10), pages 3481-3501, August.
    10. Yuan, Shiwei & Li, Xin & Du, Erhu, 2021. "Effects of farmers’ behavioral characteristics on crop choices and responses to water management policies," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    11. Namakando, Namakando, 2020. "Stakeholder perceptions of raw water quality and its management in Fetakgomo and Maruleng municipalities of Limpopo Province," Research Theses 334769, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    12. Deh-Haghi, Zoherh & Bagheri, Asghar & Fotourehchi, Zahra & Damalas, Christos A., 2020. "Farmers’ acceptance and willingness to pay for using treated wastewater in crop irrigation: A survey in western Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    13. Laura Mirra & Simone Russo & Massimiliano Borrello, 2024. "Exploring Factors Shaping Farmer Behavior in Wastewater Utilization for Agricultural Practices: A Rapid Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, March.
    14. Ricart, Sandra & Gandolfi, Claudio, 2017. "Balancing irrigation multifunctionality based on key stakeholders’ attitudes: Lessons learned from the Muzza system, Italy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 461-473.
    15. Luna Al Hadidi & Amer Sweity, 2022. "Evaluation the Efficiency of Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetland (SSF) for Wastewater Treatment and Reuse in Semi-arid Environment," Journal of Agricultural Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(4), pages 65-87, December.
    16. Saliba, R. & Callieris, R. & D’Agostino, D. & Roma, R. & Scardigno, A., 2018. "Stakeholders’ attitude towards the reuse of treated wastewater for irrigation in Mediterranean agriculture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 60-68.
    17. Ortega-Reig, Mar & Palau-Salvador, Guillermo & Cascant i Sempere, Maria Josep & Benitez-Buelga, Javier & Badiella, David & Trawick, Paul, 2014. "The integrated use of surface, ground and recycled waste water in adapting to drought in the traditional irrigation system of Valencia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 55-64.
    18. Sandra Ricart & Sylvie Clarimont, 2017. "Qualifying irrigation system sustainability and governance by means of stakeholder perceptions: the Neste Canal (France)," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(6), pages 935-954, November.
    19. Yi-Tui Chen & Chung-Chiang Chen, 2014. "The Optimal Reuse of Reclaimed Water: A Mathematical Model Analysis," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(7), pages 2035-2048, May.
    20. Ricart Casadevall, Sandra, 2016. "Improving the management of water multi-functionality through stakeholder involvement in decision-making processes," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(PA), pages 71-81.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zib:zbnees:v:6:y:2022:i:2:p:94-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zibeline International Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://environecosystem.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.