IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zib/zbnaim/v5y2021i1p31-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role Of Ict In The Dissemination And Access Of Agricultural Information By Smallholder Farmers In South Eastern Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Daisy Mbucu Ireri

    (School of Information Science and Technology, Kisii University, Kenya)

  • Mzee Awuor

    (School of Information Science and Technology, Kisii University, Kenya)

  • James Ogalo

    (School of Information Science and Technology, Kisii University, Kenya)

  • David Nzuki

    (Department of Management Science, Kenyatta University, Kenya)

Abstract

The agricultural sector has been described as the engine for economic growth and improved livelihoods in Africa. However, the sector has been in decline over many years and poor farmers have largely remained poor with 73 percent of the people living in rural areas subsisting on less than a dollar a day. The efforts to ensure global food security face an ever-expanding list of challenges such as climate change, reduced biodiversity, increasingly frequent natural disasters, food price volatility and inefficient supply chains. The inaccessibility of technological and market information has been cited as the major reason for the low productivity in African agriculture knowledge and information have become the major drivers of social and economic transformation in the world. The objective of the paper was to demonstrate the role of ICT in the dissemination and access of agricultural information by smallholder farmers in South Eastern Kenya. The researcher used mixed research method because it had the ability to explore both quantitative and qualitative research methods hence the researcher had the opportunity to use a wide variety of techniques that aided the research process. This study was carried out in Machakos, Makueni and Kitui Counties of Kenya. The local community were mostly smallholder farmers that relied on rain fed agriculture for crop farming of maize, beans, cow pea, pigeon pea and green grams. The study captured in detail the information needs of the farmers by addressing what they required in the course of normal agricultural activities. It was found out that farmers required information on soil management, pest management, use of fertilizer, weather forecast and financial management tips for mainly improving their productivity. The study concluded that there were positive outcome whenever accurate and timely information was disseminated to the farmer which led to higher quality of production and increased productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Daisy Mbucu Ireri & Mzee Awuor & James Ogalo & David Nzuki, 2021. "Role Of Ict In The Dissemination And Access Of Agricultural Information By Smallholder Farmers In South Eastern Kenya," Acta Informatica Malaysia (AIM), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 5(1), pages 31-41, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:zib:zbnaim:v:5:y:2021:i:1:p:31-41
    DOI: 10.26480/aim.01.2021.31.41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://actainformaticamalaysia.com/download/1286/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26480/aim.01.2021.31.41?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Douglas Gollin & David Lagakos & Michael E. Waugh, 2014. "Agricultural Productivity Differences across Countries," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(5), pages 165-170, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sheng, Yu & Xu, Xinpeng, 2019. "The productivity impact of climate change: Evidence from Australia's Millennium drought," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 182-191.
    2. Gottlieb, Charles & Grobovšek, Jan, 2019. "Communal land and agricultural productivity," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 135-152.
    3. Melanie Gräser, 2023. "Industrial versus artisanal mining: The effects on local employment in Liberia," Department of Economics Working Papers wuwp341, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Department of Economics.
    4. Franz Hamann & Fernando Arias-Rodríguez & Jesus Bejarano & Margarita Gafaro & Juan C. Mendez-Vizcaino & Andrea Paola Poveda-Olarte, 2019. "Productividad total de los factores y eficiencia en el uso de los recursos productivos en Colombia," Revista ESPE - Ensayos Sobre Política Económica, Banco de la República, issue 89, pages 1-54, February.
    5. Leandro DE MAGALHÃES & Dongya KOH & Räul SANTAEULILA-LLOPIS, 2019. "The Cost of Consumption Smoothing: Less Schooling and less Nutrition," JODE - Journal of Demographic Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 85(3), pages 181-208, September.
    6. Qingen Gai & Naijia Guo & Bingjing Li & Qinghua Shi & Xiaodong Zhu, 2021. "Migration Costs, Sorting, and the Agricultural Productivity Gap," Working Papers tecipa-693, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
    7. Yury Dranev & Maxim Kotsemir & Boris Syomin, 2018. "Diversity of research publications: relation to agricultural productivity and possible implications for STI policy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(3), pages 1565-1587, September.
    8. Folorunsho M. Ajide & James T. Dada, 2023. "Poverty, entrepreneurship, and economic growth in Africa," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 199-226, June.
    9. Chaoran Chen & Diego Restuccia & Raül Santaeulàlia-Llopis, 2023. "Land Misallocation and Productivity," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(2), pages 441-465, April.
    10. Xiang Li & Xiaoqin Guo, 2023. "Can Policy Promote Agricultural Service Outsourcing? Quasi-Natural Experimental Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    11. Andre Groeger & Yanos Zylberberg, 2024. "The Pick of the Crop: Agricultural Practices and Clustered Networks in Village Economies," Working Papers 1426, Barcelona School of Economics.
    12. Surya Bhushan, 2021. "Labour Productivity Dynamics in Indian Agriculture: 2000–2016," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 64(2), pages 371-388, June.
    13. Joshua D. Merfeld & Peter Brummund, 2022. "The importance of specification choices when analyzing sectoral productivity gaps," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(4), pages 605-616, July.
    14. Rivera-Padilla, Alberto, 2020. "Crop choice, trade costs, and agricultural productivity," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    15. Chen, Chaoran, 2020. "Technology adoption, capital deepening, and international productivity differences," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    16. De Magalhães, Leandro & Santaeulàlia-Llopis, Raül, 2018. "The consumption, income, and wealth of the poorest: An empirical analysis of economic inequality in rural and urban Sub-Saharan Africa for macroeconomists," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 350-371.
    17. Cruz Edgar, 2017. "Structural change and non-constant biased technical change," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(2), pages 1-23, June.
    18. McCullough, Ellen B., 2017. "Labor productivity and employment gaps in Sub-Saharan Africa," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 133-152.
    19. Tasso Adam & Loren Brandt & Chaoran Chen & Diego Restuccia & Xiaoyun Wei, 2024. "Land Security and Mobility Frictions," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 139(3), pages 1941-1987.
    20. Markhof,Yannick Valentin & Ponzini,Giulia & Wollburg,Philip Randolph, 2022. "Measuring Disaster Crop Production Losses Using Survey Microdata : Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9968, The World Bank.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zib:zbnaim:v:5:y:2021:i:1:p:31-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zibeline International Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://actainformaticamalaysia.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.