IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/jumsac/295000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opportunities and Challenges in Commissioning Materiality-Driven Sustainability Reporting Towards the SDGs: The Case of Cadeler A/S

Author

Listed:
  • Weicht, Darian Nestor

Abstract

Frequently and recently tightening and expanding sustainability reporting policies and requirements can pose significant administrative burdens on SMEs upholding a strong culture of accountability to their stakeholder network. This seminal case study examines how a Danish offshore wind farm commissioner can efficiently (1) navigate towards credibility in and (2) derive actionable insights from their sustainability (reporting) integration trajectory by capitalizing on the increasingly emphasized materiality principle. Group-based Fuzzy AHP and Textual Analysis aim to excavate and assess senior managers' and external stakeholders' preferences based on the GRI Standards and the UN's SDG targets. Internal priorities emphasize safety, compliance, and profitability, whereas external stakeholders' and their groups' priorities exhibit mixed findings on their type and extent of alignment with the former. Content elements assigned higher relative importance tend to be more robust to changes in decision-makers' uncertainty and verbal bias. The author confirms that a simplicity-informativeness trade-off tends to be driven by stakeholder grouping and that a data-driven, subject-based, and objectifying approach should be complemented with context, managerial judgment, and process iteration.

Suggested Citation

  • Weicht, Darian Nestor, 2022. "Opportunities and Challenges in Commissioning Materiality-Driven Sustainability Reporting Towards the SDGs: The Case of Cadeler A/S," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 7(3), pages 690-730.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:jumsac:295000
    DOI: 10.5282/jums/v7i3pp690-730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/295000/1/5158-3425.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5282/jums/v7i3pp690-730?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elaine Conway, 2019. "Quantitative impacts of mandatory integrated reporting," Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(4), pages 604-634, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Burak Pirgaip & Lamija Rizvić, 2023. "The Impact of Integrated Reporting on the Cost of Capital: Evidence from an Emerging Market," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Narula, Radhika & Rao, Purnima & Kumar, Satish & Matta, Rahul, 2024. "ESG scores and firm performance- evidence from emerging market," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PA), pages 1170-1184.
    3. Khuthadzo Ramabulana & Riyad Moosa, 2022. "Disclosure of Risks and Opportunities in the Integrated Reports of South African Banks," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Patrick Velte, 2022. "Archival research on integrated reporting: a systematic review of main drivers and the impact of integrated reporting on firm value," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(3), pages 997-1061, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:jumsac:295000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://jums.academy/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.