IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/iprjir/285314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Navigating the EU data governance labyrinth: A business perspective on data sharing in the financial sector

Author

Listed:
  • Coche, Eugénie
  • Kolk, Ans
  • Dekker, Martijn

Abstract

This paper offers a business perspective on the EU data governance framework, particularly related to data sharing in the financial sector. With policy-making ('on the books') centred on guaranteeing data privacy and data security whilst promoting innovation, firms face complexities when implementing this framework 'on the ground'. We build on existing work in internet policy, governance and law, multidisciplinary insights from business and management studies, and equally consider practitioner reports, legal/policy documents and industry consultations. Using the Revised Payment Services Directive as an illustrative case, our exploratory analysis reveals an implementation labyrinth, with a so-called 'privacy-security-control' nexus at its core. Already problematic for firms operating across borders in the EU, this proves to be even more the case for global companies subject to various data sharing frameworks. Our analysis also reveals that the sectoral framework by the books neither reckons with the heterogeneity of firms (incumbent and new banks, fintechs and bigtechs) nor with their business models. We expose how these 'on the ground' business realities might bring unintended effects that could be further aggravated by the (inherently slower) pace of regulation, and offer recommendations for policymakers, researchers and practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Coche, Eugénie & Kolk, Ans & Dekker, Martijn, 2024. "Navigating the EU data governance labyrinth: A business perspective on data sharing in the financial sector," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 13(1), pages 1-32.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:285314
    DOI: 10.14763/2024.1.1738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/285314/1/1882719948.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14763/2024.1.1738?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles I. Jones & Christopher Tonetti, 2020. "Nonrivalry and the Economics of Data," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(9), pages 2819-2858, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feng, Wei & Sun, Shujun & Yuan, Hang, 2023. "Research on the efficiency of factor allocation in the pilot free trade zones," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 727-745.
    2. Ehsan Valavi & Joel Hestness & Newsha Ardalani & Marco Iansiti, 2022. "Time and the Value of Data," Papers 2203.09118, arXiv.org.
    3. Du, Juntao & Shen, Zhiyang & Song, Malin & Zhang, Linda, 2023. "Nexus between digital transformation and energy technology innovation: An empirical test of A-share listed enterprises," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    4. Hu, Xiaohua & Fei, Yulian, 2023. "Does the matching degree between data and human capital affect firm innovation?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PB).
    5. David Bounie & Antoine Dubus & Patrick Waelbroeck, 2021. "Competition and Mergers with Strategic Data Intermediaries," CESifo Working Paper Series 9339, CESifo.
    6. He, Zhiguo & Huang, Jing & Zhou, Jidong, 2023. "Open banking: Credit market competition when borrowers own the data," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(2), pages 449-474.
    7. Elliott, M. & Galeotti., A. & Koh., A. & Li, W., 2021. "Market Segmentation Through Information," Janeway Institute Working Papers 2114, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    8. repec:ecb:ecbdps:202220 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Christian Peukert & Stefan Bechtold & Michail Batikas & Tobias Kretschmer, 2022. "Regulatory Spillovers and Data Governance: Evidence from the GDPR," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 746-768, July.
    10. Ahnert, Toni & Assenmacher, Katrin & Hoffmann, Peter & Leonello, Agnese & Monnet, Cyril & Porcellacchia, Davide, 2022. "The economics of central bank digital currency," CEPR Discussion Papers 17617, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    11. Bertin Martens & Alexandre de Streel & Inge Graef & Thomas Tombal & Nestor Duch-Brown, 2020. "Business-to-Business data sharing: An economic and legal analysis," JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2020-05, Joint Research Centre.
    12. Yosuke Uno & Akira Sonoda & Masaki Bessho, 2021. "The Economics of Privacy: A Primer Especially for Policymakers," Bank of Japan Working Paper Series 21-E-11, Bank of Japan.
    13. Anastasios Dosis & Wilfried Sand-Zantman, 2023. "The Ownership of Data," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 39(3), pages 615-641.
    14. Mosch, Philipp & Majocco, Philipp & Obermaier, Robert, 2023. "Contrasting value creation strategies of industrial-IoT-platforms – a multiple case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    15. Laura Veldkamp, 2023. "Valuing Data as an Asset," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 27(5), pages 1545-1562.
    16. Wendy C.Y. Li & Makoto Nirei & Kazufumi Yamana, 2018. "Value of Data: There’s No Such Thing as a Free Lunch in the Digital Economy," BEA Working Papers 0164, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
    17. Fei Wang & Linwei Ye, 2023. "Digital Transformation and Export Quality of Chinese Products: An Analysis Based on Innovation Efficiency and Total Factor Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    18. S. Nageeb Ali & Greg Lewis & Shoshana Vasserman, 2019. "Voluntary Disclosure and Personalized Pricing," Papers 1912.04774, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
    19. J Bayoán Santiago Calderón & Dylan Rassier, 2022. "Valuing the U.S. Data Economy Using Machine Learning and Online Job Postings," BEA Working Papers 0204, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
    20. Lim, Jing Zhi & Toh, Mun-Heng & Xie, Taojun, 2022. "Impact of Digital Economy Agreements on ASEAN Development: Estimates from a CGE Model," Conference papers 333441, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    21. Walther, Ansgar & Uettwiller, Antoine, 2019. "The Market for Data Privacy," CEPR Discussion Papers 13588, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:285314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://policyreview.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.