IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/iprjir/233112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Personal information management systems: A user-centric privacy utopia?

Author

Listed:
  • Janssen, Heleen
  • Cobbe, Jennifer
  • Singh, Jatinder

Abstract

Personal information management systems (PIMS) aka personal data stores (PDSs) represent an emerging class of technology that seeks to empower individuals regarding their data. Presented as an alternative to current 'centralised' data processing approaches, whereby user data is (rather opaquely) collected and processed by organisations, PDSs provide users with technical mechanisms for aggregating and managing their own data, determining when and with whom their data is shared, and the computation that may occur over that data. Though arguments for decentralisation may be appealing, there are questions regarding the extent to which PDSs actually address data processing concerns. This paper explores these questions from the perspective of PDS users. Specifically, we focus on data protection, including how PDSs relate to rights and the legal bases for processing, as well as how PDSs affect the information asymmetries and surveillance practices inherent online. We show that, despite the purported benefits of PDSs, many of the systemic issues of online/data ecosystems remain.

Suggested Citation

  • Janssen, Heleen & Cobbe, Jennifer & Singh, Jatinder, 2020. "Personal information management systems: A user-centric privacy utopia?," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 9(4), pages 1-25.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:233112
    DOI: 10.14763/2020.4.1536
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/233112/1/1755318065.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14763/2020.4.1536?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wolfgang Kerber, 2016. "Digital Markets, Data, and Privacy: Competition Law, Consumer Law, and Data Protection," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201614, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sabrina Oppl & Christian Stary, 2022. "Motivating Users to Manage Privacy Concerns in Cyber-Physical Settings—A Design Science Approach Considering Self-Determination Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Zygmuntowski, Jan J. & Zoboli, Laura & Nemitz, Paul, 2021. "Embedding European values in data governance: A case for public data commons," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 10(3), pages 1-29.
    3. Bodó, Balázs & Irion, Kristina & Janssen, Heleen & Giannopoulou, Alexandra, 2021. "Personal data ordering in context: The interaction of meso-level data governance regimes with macro frameworks," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 10(3), pages 1-31.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oliver Budzinski & Annika Stöhr, 2019. "Competition policy reform in Europe and Germany – institutional change in the light of digitization," European Competition Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 15-54, January.
    2. Afilipoaie, Adelaida & Donders, Karen & Ballon, Pieter, 2022. "The European Commission's approach to mergers involving software-based platforms: Towards a better understanding of platform power," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5).
    3. Budzinski, Oliver, 2016. "Aktuelle Herausforderungen der Wettbewerbspolitik durch Marktplätze im Internet," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 103, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    4. Budzinski, Oliver & Gänßle, Sophia & Lindstädt-Dreusicke, Nadine, 2021. "Data (r)evolution - The economics of algorithmic search and recommender services," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 148, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    5. Wolfgang Kerber & Karsten K. Zolna, 2021. "The German Facebook Case: The Law and Economics of the Relationship between Competition and Data Protection Law," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202114, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    6. Budzinski, Oliver & Schneider, Sonja, 2017. "Smart Fitness: Ökonomische Effekte einer Digitalisierung der Selbstvermessung," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 105, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    7. Ulrik Franke & Amanda Hoxell, 2020. "Observable Cyber Risk on Cournot Oligopoly Data Storage Markets," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Budzinski, Oliver & Gruésevaja, Marina & Noskova, Victoriia, 2020. "The economics of the German investigation of Facebook's data collection," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 139, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    9. Beatriz Kira & Vikram Sinha & Sharmadha Srinivasan, 2021. "Regulating digital ecosystems: bridging the gap between competition policy and data protection [Merger policy in digital markets: an ex post assessment]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(5), pages 1337-1360.
    10. Oliver Budzinski & Victoriia Noskova & Xijie Zhang, 2019. "The brave new world of digital personal assistants: benefits and challenges from an economic perspective," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 177-194, December.
    11. Sarah Geschonke & Thomas Wein, 2020. "Privacy Paradox – Economic Uncertainty Theory and Legal Consequences," Working Paper Series in Economics 393, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
    12. Stephen Jarman & Deniz D. Karaman Örsal, 2020. "The regulation of zero-price markets by the competition authorities in the USA and the EU," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 21(4), pages 315-343, December.
    13. Budzinski, Oliver, 2017. "Wettbewerbsregeln für das Digitale Zeitalter - Die Ökonomik personalisierter Daten, Verbraucherschutz und die 9. GWB-Novelle," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 108, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    14. Elena-Madalina Vatamanescu & Bogdan Gabriel Nistoreanu & Andreea Mitan, 2017. "Competition and Consumer Behavior in the Context of the Digital Economy," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(45), pages 354-354, May.
    15. Max Grafenstein & Alina Wernick & Christopher Olk, 2019. "Data Governance: Enhancing Innovation and Protecting Against Its Risks," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 54(4), pages 228-232, July.
    16. de Bas, Patrick & Batura, Olga & Yagafarova, Anastasia & van Gorp, Nicolai & Kesler, Reinhold & Laitenberger, Ulrich & Bertschek, Irene & Pichler, Eva, 2017. "Business-to-Business relations in the online platform environment. FWC ENTR/300/PP/2013/FC-WIFO: Final report," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 170570.
    17. Patrizia Gazzola & Gianluca Colombo & Roberta Pezzetti & Luminița Nicolescu, 2017. "Consumer Empowerment in the Digital Economy: Availing Sustainable Purchasing Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-19, April.
    18. Wolfgang Kerber & Karsten K. Zolna, 2022. "The German Facebook case: the law and economics of the relationship between competition and data protection law," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 217-250, October.
    19. Budzinski, Oliver & Kuchinke, Björn, 2018. "Modern industrial organization theory of media markets and competition policy implications," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 115, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    20. Budzinski, Oliver & Grusevaja, Marina, 2017. "Die Medienökonomik personalisierter Daten und der Facebook-Fall," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 107, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:233112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://policyreview.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.