IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/310917.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How critical junctures shape secessionist movement cohesion: Strategies, framing processes, and interorganizational relations before and after the 2017 referendum in Catalonia

Author

Listed:
  • Gunzelmann, Hans Jonas

Abstract

What drives the cohesion of secessionist movements? Previous research emphasized the role of internal and external factors but produced mixed results regarding their effects. This article advances scholarship on this question by examining the role of critical junctures as periods of heightened contingency that can shift movements towards fragmentation or cohesion. It focuses on independence referendums and how states respond to them as important critical junctures, and on how they shape interorganizational relations as a key dimension of movement cohesion. Empirically, it explores the effects of the 2017 referendum in Catalonia using a mixed-methods research design that combines qualitative inquiry with network analyses of protest event data. The network analyses showed that the movement was notably less cohesive in the protest arena after the referendum than during the referendum campaign. Qualitative materials were employed to inductively identify strategy framing processes as key mechanisms to explain this development. Frame alignment around the referendum as a shared goal led to more cohesion during the campaign. After the event, a frame dispute over the meaning of the referendum led to diverging strategies and fragmented the movement, as state repression limited the movement’s room for maneuver. The findings suggest that research on secessionist movement cohesion should pay more attention to critical junctures and how secessionists make sense of them.

Suggested Citation

  • Gunzelmann, Hans Jonas, 2024. "How critical junctures shape secessionist movement cohesion: Strategies, framing processes, and interorganizational relations before and after the 2017 referendum in Catalonia," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue OnlineFir, pages 1-15.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:310917
    DOI: 10.1177/00223433241258368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/310917/1/Full-text-article-Gunzelmann-How-critical.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00223433241258368?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dion, Stéphane, 1996. "Why is Secession Difficult in Well-Established Democracies? Lessons from Quebec," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(2), pages 269-283, April.
    2. Allard Duursma & Feike Fliervoet, 2021. "Fueling Factionalism? The Impact of Peace Processes on Rebel Group Fragmentation in Civil Wars," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 65(4), pages 788-812, April.
    3. Lluis Orriols & Toni Rodon, 2016. "The 2015 Catalan Election: The Independence Bid at the Polls," South European Society and Politics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 359-381, July.
    4. Cunningham, Kathleen Gallagher, 2011. "Divide and Conquer or Divide and Concede: How Do States Respond to Internally Divided Separatists?," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 105(2), pages 275-297, May.
    5. Gade, Emily Kalah, 2020. "Social Isolation and Repertoires of Resistance," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 114(2), pages 309-325, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hanne Fjelde & Desirée Nilsson, 2018. "The rise of rebel contenders," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 55(5), pages 551-565, September.
    2. Briggs, Ryan C & Solodoch, Omer, 2021. "Changes in perceptions of border security influence desired levels of immigration," OSF Preprints wt74y, Center for Open Science.
    3. Jordi Muñoz, 2021. "The Catalan Syndrome? Revisiting the Relationship Between Income and Support for Independence in Catalonia," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 376-385.
    4. Robert Ulrich Nagel & Austin C. Doctor, 2020. "Conflict-related Sexual Violence and Rebel Group Fragmentation," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 64(7-8), pages 1226-1253, August.
    5. Nils-Christian Bormann & Burcu Savun, 2018. "Reputation, concessions, and territorial civil war," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 55(5), pages 671-686, September.
    6. Anwen Elias & Núria Franco-Guillén, 2021. "Justifying Secession in Catalonia: Resolving Grievances or a Means to a Better Future?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 453-464.
    7. Gary Uzonyi & Matthew Wells, 2016. "Domestic institutions, leader tenure and the duration of civil war," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 33(3), pages 294-310, July.
    8. Anwen Elias & Núria Franco-Guillén, 2021. "Justifying Secession in Catalonia: Resolving Grievances or a Means to a Better Future?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 453-464.
    9. Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, 2017. "Dangerous bargains with the devil? Incorporating new approaches in peace science for the study of war," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 34(1), pages 98-116, January.
    10. Kirssa Cline Ryckman, 2020. "A Turn to Violence: The Escalation of Nonviolent Movements," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 64(2-3), pages 318-343, February.
    11. Gizelis Theodora-Ismene, 2018. "Systematic Study of Gender, Conflict, and Peace," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 24(4), pages 1-10, December.
    12. Hendrix, Cullen & Noland, Marcus, 2023. "The West versus Beijing? Determinants of the UN Human Rights Council vote (not) to debate human rights in Xinjiang," MPRA Paper 118630, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Erica Chenoweth & Evan Perkoski & Sooyeon Kang, 2017. "State Repression and Nonviolent Resistance," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 61(9), pages 1950-1969, October.
    14. Ferran Requejo & Marc Sanjaume-Calvet, 2021. "Explaining Secessionism: What Do We Really Know About It?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 371-375.
    15. Sooyeon Kang, 2023. "Upping the ante without taking up arms: Why mass movements escalate demands," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 60(1), pages 73-87, January.
    16. RezaeeDaryakenari, Babak & Özdamar, Özgür & Akbaba, Yasemin, 2024. "Battle of Sects? Iran and Saudi Arabia’s Role Conflict in the MENA," OSF Preprints rt2pb, Center for Open Science.
    17. Jessica Maves Braithwaite & Kathleen Gallagher Cunningham, 2024. "Backgrounds With Benefits? Rebel Group Origins and Concessions During Civil Wars in Africa," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 68(9), pages 1691-1716, October.
    18. Tim Heinkelmann-Wild & Marius Mehrl, 2022. "Indirect Governance at War: Delegation and Orchestration in Rebel Support," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 66(1), pages 115-143, January.
    19. Lesley-Ann Daniels, 2020. "How and When Amnesty during Conflict Affects Conflict Termination," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 64(9), pages 1612-1637, October.
    20. Alexander Libman, 2015. "Words or deeds: what matters? On the role of symbolic action in political decentralization," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 801-838, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:310917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.