IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/262289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Privatisierung ohne Privatismus. Soziale Medien im digitalen Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit
[Privatization without Privatism. Social Media and the Digital Transformation of the Public Sphere]

Author

Listed:
  • Staab, Philipp
  • Thiel, Thorsten

Abstract

Der Beitrag geht der Frage nach, wie sich die durch soziale Medien transformierte Öffentlichkeit der Gegenwart im Rückgriff auf Jürgen Habermas’ ursprüngliche Theorie des Strukturwandels der Öffentlichkeit fassen lässt. Er plädiert für eine Rückbesinnung auf politökonomische Grundlagen als Basis der Analyse von Öffentlichkeit und arbeitet für die sozialen Medien einen charakteristischen Zusammenhang von digital-behavioristischer Verhaltenssteuerung und singularisiertem Publikum im Kontext proprietärer Marktformen heraus. In der digitalen Konstellation geht es in der Folge weniger um die Ruhigstellung des*der Bürger*in als Konsument*in, sondern um seine*ihre auch politische Aktivierung – allerdings unter dem Primat kommerzieller Interessen: um Privatisierung ohne Privatismus.

Suggested Citation

  • Staab, Philipp & Thiel, Thorsten, 2021. "Privatisierung ohne Privatismus. Soziale Medien im digitalen Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit [Privatization without Privatism. Social Media and the Digital Transformation of the Public Sphere]," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 0, pages 277-297.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:262289
    DOI: 10.5771/9783748912187-275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/262289/1/Full-text-article-Staab-et-al-Privatisierung-ohne-Privatismus.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5771/9783748912187-275?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hirschman, Albert O, 1982. "Rival Interpretations of Market Society: Civilizing, Destructive, or Feeble?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 20(4), pages 1463-1484, December.
    2. Thiel, Thorsten, 2020. "Öffentlichkeit, digitale. Zum neuen Strukturwandel der öffentlichen Sphäre," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 197-210.
    3. Berg, Sebastian & Rakowski, Niklas & Thiel, Thorsten, 2020. "Die digitale Konstellation. Eine Positionsbestimmung," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 30(2), pages 171-191.
    4. Bennett, Colin J. & Lyon, David, 2019. "Data-driven elections: implications and challenges for democratic societies," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 8(4), pages 1-16.
    5. Elder-Vass,Dave, 2016. "Profit and Gift in the Digital Economy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781316509388, October.
    6. Elder-Vass,Dave, 2016. "Profit and Gift in the Digital Economy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107146143, October.
    7. Hofmann, Jeanette, 2019. "Mediatisierte Demokratie in Zeiten der Digitalisierung – Eine Forschungsperspektive," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 27-46.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Staab, Philipp & Thiel, Thorsten, 2022. "Social Media and the Digital Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 39(4), pages 129-143.
    2. Andrew Cumbers & Robert McMaster & Susana Cabaço & Michael J White, 2020. "Reconfiguring Economic Democracy: Generating New Forms of Collective Agency, Individual Economic Freedom and Public Participation," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(4), pages 678-695, August.
    3. Røpke, Inge, 2020. "Econ 101—In need of a sustainability transition," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    4. Dolata, Ulrich, 2020. "Internet – Plattformen – Regulierung: Koordination von Märkten und Kuratierung von Sozialität," Research Contributions to Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies, SOI Discussion Papers 2020-01, University of Stuttgart, Institute for Social Sciences, Department of Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies.
    5. Dolata, Ulrich, 2020. "Internet – Platforms – Regulation: Coordination of Markets and Curation of Sociality," Research Contributions to Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies, SOI Discussion Papers 2020-02, University of Stuttgart, Institute for Social Sciences, Department of Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies.
    6. Burnes, Bernard & Choi, Hwanho, 2021. "Hybrid economy in the digital age: The case of the independent music community in Korea," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    7. James Swaney, 1990. "The environmental imperative of socio-economics," Forum for Social Economics, Springer;The Association for Social Economics, vol. 20(1), pages 45-58, September.
    8. Thiel, Thorsten, 2020. "Demokratie in der digitalen Konstellation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 331-349.
    9. Niclas Berggren & Therese Nilsson, 2013. "Does Economic Freedom Foster Tolerance?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(2), pages 177-207, May.
    10. David George, 2006. "Social class and social identity," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 64(4), pages 429-445.
    11. Palsson, Gisli, 1998. "The virtual aquarium: Commodity fiction and cod fishing," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(2-3), pages 275-288, February.
    12. McCabe, Joshua T., 2012. "What can sociology teach us about the ideational origins of modernity? Comments on McCloskey's Bourgeois Dignity," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 772-775.
    13. Rick Wicks, 2009. "A model of dynamic balance among the three spheres of society – markets, governments, and communities," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(5), pages 535-565, April.
    14. Beck, Ulrik & Bjerge, Benedikte, 2017. "Pro-poor Land Transfers and the Importance of Land Abundance and Ethnicity in The Gambia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 122-140.
    15. Berggren, Niclas & Nilsson, Therese, 2016. "Tolerance in the United States: Does economic freedom transform racial, religious, political and sexual attitudes?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 45(S), pages 53-70.
    16. Rick Wicks, 2012. "Assumption Without Representation: The Unacknowledged Abstraction from Communities and Social Goods," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 57(1), pages 78-95, May.
    17. Andreas G B Ziegler & Giorgia Romagnoli & Theo Offerman, 2024. "Morals in Multi-Unit Markets," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 22(5), pages 2225-2260.
    18. Jeffrey P. Carpenter, 2005. "Endogenous Social Preferences," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 37(1), pages 63-84, March.
    19. Mona Mortazian & Seyedeh Asieh H. Tabaghdehi & Bryan Mase, 2019. "Large Shareholding and Firm Value in the Alternative Investment Market (AIM)," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 26(2), pages 229-252, June.
    20. Peter Maskell & Mark Lorenzen, 2004. "The Cluster as Market Organisation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(5-6), pages 991-1009, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:262289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.