IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/235706.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deutschland: ein Land der Mieter? Die Rolle von Erwartungen über zukünftige Immobilienpreisentwicklungen

Author

Listed:
  • Gohl, Niklas
  • Haan, Peter
  • Michelsen, Claus
  • Weinhardt, Felix

Abstract

Mehr als die Hälfte aller Haushalte in Deutschland wohnen zur Miete – ein im internationalen Vergleich sehr hoher Wert. Bisherige Studien haben vor allen Dingen den regulatorischen Rahmen des Immobilienmarkts hervorgehoben, der Mietwohnungen in Deutschland systematisch begünstigt. Allerdings gibt es keine Studien, die diese Erklärungen empirisch eindeutig untermauern können: einige Arbeiten betonen die Bedeutung von fundamentalen Marktdaten wie die Einkommensentwicklung, demographische Faktoren oder den Zuzug in eine Region. Diese Studie greift einen Aspekt auf, der bislang nicht in der Literatur diskutiert wurde. Untersucht wird, ob und zu welchem Anteil die geringe Eigentümerquote in Deutschland durch pessimistische Erwartungen bezüglich zukünftiger Immobilienpreisentwicklungen erklärt werden kann – erwarten Mieter keine oder nur geringe Preissteigerungen, so sinkt die Attraktivität einer Investition in die eigenen vier Wände. Für die empirische Analyse werden Daten aus einer neuen, repräsentativen Befragung, erhoben im Rahmen des SOEP-IS, ausgewertet. Befragte ausländischer Herkunft sind optimistischer hinsichtlich der Immobilienpreisentwicklung. Sie erwarten langfristig einen signifikant höheren Preisanstieg. Dies legt nahe, dass die erheblich pessimistischeren Preiserwartungen der einheimischen Bevölkerung auch dazu führen, dass sie sich seltener als die Bevölkerung in anderen Ländern für selbstgenutztes Wohneigentum entscheiden.

Suggested Citation

  • Gohl, Niklas & Haan, Peter & Michelsen, Claus & Weinhardt, Felix, 2019. "Deutschland: ein Land der Mieter? Die Rolle von Erwartungen über zukünftige Immobilienpreisentwicklungen," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 95-109.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:235706
    DOI: 10.1365/s41056-019-00036-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/235706/1/Gohl2019_Article_DeutschlandEinLandDerMieterDie%20VV.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1365/s41056-019-00036-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Chiuri & Tullio Jappelli, 2010. "Do the elderly reduce housing equity? An international comparison," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 23(2), pages 643-663, March.
    2. Cerutti, Eugenio & Dagher, Jihad & Dell'Ariccia, Giovanni, 2017. "Housing finance and real-estate booms: A cross-country perspective," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-13.
    3. W.A.V. Clark & M.C. Deurloo & F.M. Dieleman, 1997. "Entry to Home-ownership in Germany: Some Comparisons with the United States," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(1), pages 7-19, January.
    4. Kamila Sommer & Paul Sullivan, 2018. "Implications of US Tax Policy for House Prices, Rents, and Homeownership," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(2), pages 241-274, February.
    5. Diaz-Serrano, Luis, 2009. "Disentangling the housing satisfaction puzzle: Does homeownership really matter?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 745-755, October.
    6. Oliver W. Lerbs & Christian A. Oberst, 2014. "Explaining the Spatial Variation in Homeownership Rates: Results for German Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(5), pages 844-865, May.
    7. Clara H. Mulder & Michael Wagner, 1998. "First-time Home-ownership in the Family Life Course: A West German-Dutch Comparison," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(4), pages 687-713, April.
    8. Díaz Serrano, Luis & Ferrer Carbonell, Ada & Hartog, Joop, 2009. "Disentangling the Housing Satisfaction Puzzle: Does Homeownership Really Matter?," Working Papers 2072/42898, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    9. Chiuri, Maria Concetta & Jappelli, Tullio, 2003. "Financial market imperfections and home ownership: A comparative study," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 857-875, October.
    10. Sergej Bechtoldt & Ronny Freier & Johannes Geyer & Frank Kühn, 2014. "Acht Jahre nach der Reform der Grunderwerbsteuer: Bundesländer nutzen ihre Spielräume für Steuererhöhungen," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 81(50), pages 1283-1290.
    11. Turner, Tracy M. & Luea, Heather, 2009. "Homeownership, wealth accumulation and income status," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 104-114, June.
    12. Claus Michelsen, 2017. "Erwerb von Wohneigentum: Eigenkapitalschwelle für immer mehr Haushalte zu hoch," DIW aktuell 2, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ehsan Latif, 2021. "Homeownership and happiness: evidence from Canad," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 41(1), pages 1-17.
    2. Mingzhi Hu & Wenping Ye, 2020. "Home Ownership and Subjective Wellbeing: A Perspective from Ownership Heterogeneity," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1059-1079, March.
    3. Anna van der Schors & Rob J.M. Alessie & Mauro Mastrogiacomo, 2007. "Home and Mortgage Ownership of the Dutch Elderly: Explaining Cohort, Time and Age Effects," Social and Economic Dimensions of an Aging Population Research Papers 183, McMaster University.
    4. Andrew E. Clark & Luis Diaz-Serrano, 2023. "Do individuals adapt to all types of housing transitions?," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 645-672, June.
    5. Adrian Chadi & Clemens Hetschko, 2021. "How Job Changes Affect People's Lives — Evidence from Subjective Well‐Being Data," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 59(2), pages 279-306, June.
    6. Serena Fatica & Doris Prammer, 2018. "Housing and the Tax System: How Large Are the Distortions in the Euro Area?," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(2), pages 299-342, June.
    7. Miriam Marcén & Marina Morales, 2020. "The effect of culture on home‐ownership," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 56-87, January.
    8. Michal Rubaszek, 2017. "Reforming housing rental market in a life-cycle model," KAE Working Papers 2017-028, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis.
    9. Steffen Otterbach & Alfonso Sousa-Poza, 2016. "Job insecurity, employability and health: an analysis for Germany across generations," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(14), pages 1303-1316, March.
    10. Anna van der Schors & Rob Alessie & Mauro Mastrogiacomo, 2007. "Home and mortgage ownership of the Dutch elderly; explaining cohort, time and age effects," CPB Discussion Paper 77.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    11. Luis Diaz‐Serrano & Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose, 2012. "Decentralization, Subjective Well‐Being, and the Perception of Institutions," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(2), pages 179-193, May.
    12. Díaz Serrano, Lluís & Rodríguez Pose, Andrés, 2011. "Decentralization, happiness and the perception of institutions," Working Papers 2072/151812, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    13. Gonzalo Salas & Andrea Vigorito, 2019. "Subjective Well-Being and Adaptation. The Case of Uruguay," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 14(3), pages 685-703, July.
    14. Michal Rubaszek & Margarita Rubio, 2020. "Does the rental housing market stabilize the economy? A micro and macro perspective," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 233-257, July.
    15. Abdul Munasib, 2009. "Housing Tenure Choice Implications of Social Networks: A Structural Model Approach," Economics Working Paper Series 0905, Oklahoma State University, Department of Economics and Legal Studies in Business.
    16. Wojtek Tomaszewski & Francisco Perales, 2014. "Who Settles for Less? Subjective Dispositions, Objective Circumstances, and Housing Satisfaction," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 118(1), pages 181-203, August.
    17. Bangkim Kshetrimayum & Ronita Bardhan & Tetsu Kubota, 2020. "Factors Affecting Residential Satisfaction in Slum Rehabilitation Housing in Mumbai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    18. Seymour Spilerman & Francois-Charles Wolff, 2012. "Parental wealth and resource transfers: How they matter in France for home ownership and living standards," Post-Print hal-03914532, HAL.
    19. Feng Hu, 2013. "Homeownership and Subjective Wellbeing in Urban China: Does Owning a House Make You Happier?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 110(3), pages 951-971, February.
    20. Renata Bottazzi & Thomas Crossley & Matthew Wakefield, 2012. "Late starters or excluded generations? A cohort analysis of catch up in homeownership in England," Koç University-TUSIAD Economic Research Forum Working Papers 1215, Koc University-TUSIAD Economic Research Forum.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:235706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.