IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/234129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Die Ostdeutschlandforschung muss das Wohnen in den Blick nehmen: Plädoyer für eine neue politisch-institutionelle Perspektive auf ostdeutsche Städte

Author

Listed:
  • Bernt, Matthias
  • Holm, Andrej

Abstract

Ostdeutschland ist in den vergangenen Jahren verstärkt zum Thema öffentlicher und wissenschaftlicher Debatten geworden. Neben Pegida und AfD haben dabei auch neue Zahlen zur Segregation in ostdeutschen Städten das wissenschaftliche Interesse wiederbelebt. Der Beitrag kritisiert vor diesem Hintergrund die weitgehende Ausblendung institutioneller Perspektiven in der Ostdeutschlandforschung sowie die fehlende Berücksichtigung von ostdeutschen Sonderbedingungen in der Stadtforschung. An den Beispielen der Restitutionsregelungen und der ‚Altschuldenhilfe‘ skizziert der Beitrag den harten Bruch der ostdeutschen Wohnerfahrungen. Beide Transformationsentscheidungen stehen exemplarisch für die umfassende Privatisierung der ostdeutschen Wohnungswirtschaft, die Überführung von gesellschaftlich verankerter Wohnsicherheit in Marktbeziehungen und die Neuzusammensetzung der Eigentumsstrukturen. Die wachsende Bedeutung verwertungsorientierter Investitionskalküle und entlokalisierter Eigentumsstrukturen sind dabei keine Übergangsphänomene einer nachholenden Anpassung, sondern langfristig wirksames Ergebnis der Transformation. Daraus abgeleitet wird ein doppeltes Argument: Zum einen kann die Stadtentwicklung in Ostdeutschland nur vor dem Hintergrund der auf die Wiedervereinigung folgenden umfassenden Privatisierungen verstanden werden. Diese verursachten eine Serie von Nebenwirkungen, deren Folgen die Stadtentwicklung in Ostdeutschland bis heute belasten. Zweitens eröffnet die Einbeziehung von Themen der Stadt- und Wohnungsforschung neue Perspektiven für die Ostdeutschlandforschung. Gerade weil sich im Wohnen Alltagserfahrungen und politisch-ökonomische Strukturen kreuzen, muss die Untersuchung von spezifisch ostdeutschen Subjektivitäten durch die Analyse konkreter Machtverhältnisse und institutioneller Rahmenbedingungen fundiert werden.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernt, Matthias & Holm, Andrej, 2020. "Die Ostdeutschlandforschung muss das Wohnen in den Blick nehmen: Plädoyer für eine neue politisch-institutionelle Perspektive auf ostdeutsche Städte," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 8(3), pages 97-114.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:234129
    DOI: 10.36900/suburban.v8i3.593
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/234129/1/593-Artikeltext-3259-1-10-20201214.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.36900/suburban.v8i3.593?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sander, Birgit, 1994. "Anpassungsprozesse in der ostdeutschen Wohnungswirtschaft: Analyse und Bewertung," Kiel Discussion Papers 224/225, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    2. Harvey, David, 2005. "The New Imperialism," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199278084.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patricia M Martin, 2005. "Comparative Topographies of Neoliberalism in Mexico," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(2), pages 203-220, February.
    2. Ahmed, Abubakari & Kuusaana, Elias Danyi & Gasparatos, Alexandros, 2018. "The role of chiefs in large-scale land acquisitions for jatropha production in Ghana: insights from agrarian political economy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 570-582.
    3. Knudsen, Daniel C. & Rickly, Jillian M. & Vidon, Elizabeth S., 2016. "The fantasy of authenticity: Touring with Lacan," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 33-45.
    4. Sarah Ryser, 2019. "The Anti-Politics Machine of Green Energy Development: The Moroccan Solar Project in Ouarzazate and Its Impact on Gendered Local Communities," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Ross Beveridge & Philippe Koch, 2017. "The post-political trap? Reflections on politics, agency and the city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(1), pages 31-43, January.
    6. Beatriz Bustos, 2015. "Moving on? Neoliberal continuities through crisis: the case of the Chilean salmon industry and the ISA virus," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(6), pages 1361-1375, December.
    7. Bradley R Wilson, 2013. "Breaking the Chains: Coffee, Crisis, and Farmworker Struggle in Nicaragua," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(11), pages 2592-2609, November.
    8. David Kyuman Kim & John L. Jackson Jr., 2011. "Introduction," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 637(1), pages 6-16, September.
    9. Gérard Duménil & Dominique Lévy, 2014. "The crisis of the early 21st Century: Marxian perspectives," Chapters, in: Riccardo Bellofiore & Giovanna Vertova (ed.), The Great Recession and the Contradictions of Contemporary Capitalism, chapter 2, pages 26-49, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Carol Upadhya, 2017. "Amaravati and the New Andhra," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 12(2), pages 177-202, August.
    11. van Meeteren, Michiel & Kleibert, Jana, 2022. "The global division of labour as enduring archipelago: thinking through the spatiality of ‘globalisation in reverse’," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 15(2), pages 389-406.
    12. Adam Branch, 2013. "Gulu in War … and Peace? The Town as Camp in Northern Uganda," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(15), pages 3152-3167, November.
    13. B.S. Chimni, 2010. "Mapping Indian Foreign Economic Policy," International Studies, , vol. 47(2-4), pages 163-185, April.
    14. Nikita Sud, 2020. "The Unfixed State of Unfixed Land," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 51(5), pages 1175-1198, September.
    15. Eve Bratman & Ted Auch & Bryan Stinchfield, 2022. "The Fracking Frontier in the United States: A Case Study of Foreign Investment, Civil Liberties and Land Ethics in the Shale Industry," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 53(3), pages 469-494, May.
    16. Woods, Kevin M., 2020. "Smaller-scale land grabs and accumulation from below: Violence, coercion and consent in spatially uneven agrarian change in Shan State, Myanmar," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    17. Anders Lund Hansen & Henrik Gutzon Larsen & Adam Grydehoj & Eric Clark, 2015. "Financialisation of the built environment in Stockholm and Copenhagen," Working papers wpaper115, Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project.
    18. Vasudha Chhotray, 2006. "Contrasting visions for aid and governance in the 21st century: the White House Millennium Challenge Account and DFID`s Drivers of Change," Economics Series Working Papers GPRG-WPS-062, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    19. Ugo Rossi, 2019. "The common-seekers: Capturing and reclaiming value in the platform metropolis," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(8), pages 1418-1433, December.
    20. Meina Cai & Jianyong Fan & Chunhui Ye & Qi Zhang, 2021. "Government debt, land financing and distributive justice in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(11), pages 2329-2347, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:234129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.