IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/200408.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Zivilgesellschaft, politischer Konflikt und soziale Bewegungen

Author

Listed:
  • Grande, Edgar

Abstract

Der Beitrag untersucht die Beziehungen zwischen Zivilgesellschaft, Demokratie und gesellschaftlichem Zusammenhalt. Er argumentiert, dass die Rolle der Zivilgesellschaft in diesem Beziehungsgeflecht ambivalent ist. Für den gesellschaftlichen Zusammenhalt und die Qualität demokratischen Regierens ist nicht nur die Stärke der Zivilgesellschaft entscheidend, wichtiger noch sind die normative Orientierung der Zivilgesellschaft, ihre innere Struktur und ihre Einbettung in die relevanten politischen Konfliktstrukturen.

Suggested Citation

  • Grande, Edgar, 2018. "Zivilgesellschaft, politischer Konflikt und soziale Bewegungen," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 31(1-2), pages 52-60.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:200408
    DOI: 10.1515/fjsb-2018-0007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/200408/1/f-21389-Volltext-Grande-Zivilgesellschaft-v3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/fjsb-2018-0007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hanspeter Kriesi, 2016. "The Politicization of European Integration," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54, pages 32-47, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Höltmann, Gesine & Hutter, Swen & Rößler-Prokhorenko, Charlotte, 2022. "Solidarität und Protest in der Zeitenwende: Reaktionen der Zivilgesellschaft auf den Ukraine-Krieg," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Center for Civil Society Research ZZ 2022-601, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    2. Schroeder, Wolfgang & Greef, Samuel & Ten Elsen, Jennifer & Heller, Lukas, 2021. "Rechtspopulismus und organisierte Zivilgesellschaft," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 155-164.
    3. Grande, Edgar, 2021. "Entwicklungen und Herausforderungen der Zivilgesellschaft in Deutschland," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 165-181.
    4. Mayntz, Renate, 2023. "Paradigm shifts in macrosociology," MPIfG Discussion Paper 23/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    5. Grande, Brigitte & Grande, Edgar & Hahn, Udo (ed.), 2021. "Zivilgesellschaft in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland - Aufbrüche, Umbrüche, Ausblicke," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, volume 111, number 238190.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katjana Gattermann & Claes H De Vreese, 2017. "The role of candidate evaluations in the 2014 European Parliament elections: Towards the personalization of voting behaviour?," European Union Politics, , vol. 18(3), pages 447-468, September.
    2. Nikitas Konstantinidis & Konstantinos Matakos & Hande Mutlu-Eren, 2019. "“Take back control”? The effects of supranational integration on party-system polarization," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 297-333, June.
    3. Braun, Daniela & Grande, Edgar, 2021. "Politicizing Europe in Elections to the European Parliament (1994–2019): The Crucial Role of Mainstream Parties," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 59(5), pages 1124-1141.
    4. Esther Ademmer & Anna Leupold & Tobias Stöhr, 2019. "Much ado about nothing? The (non-) politicisation of the European Union in social media debates on migration," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(2), pages 305-327, June.
    5. Anna-Lena Högenauer, 2021. "Scrutiny or Complacency? Banking Union in the Bundestag and the Assemblée Nationale," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 219-229.
    6. Ben Rosamond, 2020. "European Integration and the Politics of Economic Ideas: Economics, Economists and Market Contestation in the Brexit Debate," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(5), pages 1085-1106, September.
    7. Hernan Winkler, 2019. "The effect of income inequality on political polarization: Evidence from European regions, 2002–2014," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 137-162, July.
    8. Wouter van der Brug & Katjana Gattermann & Claes H. de Vreese, 2022. "Electoral responses to the increased contestation over European integration. The European Elections of 2019 and beyond," European Union Politics, , vol. 23(1), pages 3-20, March.
    9. Stefan Telle & Lisanne de Blok & Catherine E. de Vries & Lorenzo Cicchi, 2022. "Elite‐Mass Linkages in the Preference Formation on Differentiated Integration," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(6), pages 1663-1683, November.
    10. Reinout A van der Veer & Markus Haverland, 2018. "Bread and butter or bread and circuses? Politicisation and the European Commission in the European Semester," European Union Politics, , vol. 19(3), pages 524-545, September.
    11. Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian & Zangl, Bernhard, 2020. "Zwischen Hoffen und Bangen: Zum Verhältnis von Autorität, Politisierung und Demokratisierung in internationalen Organisationen [Between hope and fear: On the relationship between authority, politic," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 27(1), pages 5-36.
    12. Sofia Vasilopoulou & Katjana Gattermann, 2021. "Does Politicization Matter for EU Representation? A Comparison of Four European Parliament Elections," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 661-678, May.
    13. Laurie Beaudonnet & Raul Gomez, 2024. "The imbalanced effect of politicization: How EU politicization favours Eurosceptic parties," European Union Politics, , vol. 25(2), pages 354-375, June.
    14. Radosław Markowski & Piotr Zagórski, 2024. "The Eurodisappointed: On the disenchantment with the EU's limited response to democratic backsliding," European Union Politics, , vol. 25(2), pages 223-244, June.
    15. Richard Youngs & Özge Zihnioğlu, 2021. "EU Aid Policy in the Middle East and North Africa: Politicization and its Limits," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 126-142, January.
    16. Grande, Edgar & Vidal, Guillem, 2020. "A vote for Europe? The 2019 EP elections from the voters' perspective," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Center for Civil Society Research ZZ 2020-601, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    17. Daniela Braun & Edgar Grande, 2021. "Politicizing Europe in Elections to the European Parliament (1994–2019): The Crucial Role of Mainstream Parties," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1124-1141, September.
    18. Grande, Edgar & Schwarzbözl, Tobias & Fatke, Matthias, 2019. "Politicizing immigration in Western Europe," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 26(10), pages 1444-1463.
    19. Tiago Moreira Ramalho, 2020. "The Troika in its own words: responding to the politicisation of the southern European crises," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/337630, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    20. Julia Schulte-Cloos, 2018. "Do European Parliament elections foster challenger parties' success on the national level?," European Union Politics, , vol. 19(3), pages 408-426, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:200408. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.