IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zag/market/v32y2020isip99-113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Consumers Always Greener on the Other Side of the Fence? Factors That Influence Green Purchase Intentions – The Context of Croatian and Swedish Consumers

Author

Listed:
  • Branka Dropulić

    (University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics & Business)

  • Zoran Krupka

    (University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics & Business)

Abstract

Purpose – Seeking to understand sustainability through the concept of green marketing mix and green consumer behaviour better, this paper examines their role in expressing green purchase intentions. Aiming to get a better insight into green consumer behaviour, it explores two important psychographic and behavioural variables: environmental awareness and perceived consumer effectiveness. The concept of both marketing mix and green consumer behaviour are examined in two very different contexts (Croatia and Sweden). Design/Methodology/Approach – To conduct the research, a self-completed highly structured questionnaire was designed. Green product characteristics were defined through the concept of marketing mix, while green consumers were defined according to their demographics and two psychographic and behavioural variables. The research was conducted among Croatian and Swedish consumers. Findings and implications – The research showed that the two samples, despite differences, have two factors of influence on green purchase intention in common: perceived higher quality of green products and environmental awareness. Both Croatian and Swedish consumers showed willingness to pay the premium price for green products, which shows the important role of price as a quality communicator of green products. Eco-labels, once they become a standard as is the case of the Swedish market, no longer have strong influence on green purchase intention. Limitations – The main limitation of this research is the fact that only low involvement products were used in the questionnaire. Originality – The main contribution of the paper is a deeper insight in purchase intentions of green consumers. The factors that drive green purchase intentions are observed in two different cultural, political and economic contexts, which adds value to green consumer understanding, but also contributes to better understanding of green product management.

Suggested Citation

  • Branka Dropulić & Zoran Krupka, 2020. "Are Consumers Always Greener on the Other Side of the Fence? Factors That Influence Green Purchase Intentions – The Context of Croatian and Swedish Consumers," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 32(SI), pages 99-113.
    • Handle: RePEc:zag:market:v:32:y:2020:i:si:p:99-113
    DOI: 10.22598/mt/2020.32.spec-issue.99
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.22598/mt/2020.32.spec-issue.99
    Download Restriction: None
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22598/mt/2020.32.spec-issue.99?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Wheale & David Hinton, 2007. "Ethical consumers in search of markets," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(4), pages 302-315, May.
    2. Rosa Dangelico & Devashish Pujari, 2010. "Mainstreaming Green Product Innovation: Why and How Companies Integrate Environmental Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(3), pages 471-486, September.
    3. Roberts, James A., 1996. "Will the real socially responsible consumer please step forward?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 79-83.
    4. Thomas P. Lyon & John W. Maxwell, 2011. "Greenwash: Corporate Environmental Disclosure under Threat of Audit," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 3-41, March.
    5. Dorothée Brécard, 2017. "Consumer misperception of eco-labels, green market structure and welfare," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 340-364, June.
    6. Arzu Şener & Oya Hazer, 2008. "Values and sustainable consumption behavior of women: a Turkish sample," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(5), pages 291-300.
    7. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    8. Melinda Majláth, 2010. "Can Individuals do anything for the Environment? - The Role of Perceived Consumer Effectiveness," Proceedings of FIKUSZ '10, in: László Áron Kóczy (ed.),Proceedings of FIKUSZ 2010, pages 157-166, Óbuda University, Keleti Faculty of Business and Management.
    9. Vermeir, Iris & Verbeke, Wim, 2008. "Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: Theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 542-553, January.
    10. William Young & Kumju Hwang & Seonaidh McDonald & Caroline J. Oates, 2010. "Sustainable consumption: green consumer behaviour when purchasing products," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(1), pages 20-31.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chun-Wei Chen, 2024. "Utilizing a Hybrid Approach to Identify the Importance of Factors That Influence Consumer Decision-Making Behavior in Purchasing Sustainable Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-39, May.
    2. Kalisri Logeswaran Aravindan & Thurasamy Ramayah & Munusamy Thavanethen & Murali Raman & Narinasamy Ilhavenil & Sanmugam Annamalah & Yap Voon Choong, 2023. "Modeling Positive Electronic Word of Mouth and Purchase Intention Using Theory of Consumption Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Jessica Müller & Ángel Acevedo-Duque & Sheyla Müller & Prateek Kalia & Khalid Mehmood, 2021. "Predictive Sustainability Model Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior Incorporating Ecological Conscience and Moral Obligation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Ilona Skackauskiene & Neringa Vilkaite-Vaitone, 2022. "Green Marketing and Customers’ Purchasing Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review for Future Research Agenda," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Sonia Chien-I Chen & Chenglian Liu & Zhenyuan Wang & Farid Arya, 2022. "Innovative Strategies to Fuel Organic Food Business Growth: A Qualitative Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Neringa Vilkaite-Vaitone & Vilma Tamuliene, 2023. "Unveiling the Untapped Potential of Green Consumption in Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizabeth A. Minton & Soo Jiuan Tan & Siok Kuan Tambyah & Richie L. Liu, 2022. "Drivers of Sustainability and Consumer Well-Being: An Ethically-Based Examination of Religious and Cultural Values," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 167-190, January.
    2. Feucht, Yvonne & Zander, Katrin, 2017. "Consumers’ attitudes on carbon footprint labelling. Results of the SUSDIET project," Thünen Working Paper 266396, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    3. Wintschnig, Bea Alexandra, 2021. "The Attitude-Behavior Gap – Drivers and Barriers of Sustainable Consumption," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 6(2), pages 324-346.
    4. Erifili Papista & Athanasios Krystallis, 2013. "Investigating the Types of Value and Cost of Green Brands: Proposition of a Conceptual Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 75-92, June.
    5. Liangdong Lu & Mengyao Wang & Jia Xu, 2023. "How to Keep Investors’ Confidence after Being Labeled as Polluting Firms: The Role of External Political Ties and Internal Green Innovation Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Ary José A. de Souza-Jr. & Flávio Terto, 2021. "The propensity to adaptation under the new era of climate changes," Working Papers REM 2021/0167, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
    7. Vilma Tamuliene & Egle Kazlauskiene & Lina Pileliene, 2016. "Ecologically-Conscious Consumer Purchases in Lithuania," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 12(4), pages 87-96.
    8. Liobikienė, Genovaitė & Mandravickaitė, Justina & Bernatonienė, Jurga, 2016. "Theory of planned behavior approach to understand the green purchasing behavior in the EU: A cross-cultural study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 38-46.
    9. Ragna Nilssen & Geoff Bick & Russell Abratt, 2019. "Comparing the relative importance of sustainability as a consumer purchase criterion of food and clothing in the retail sector," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(1), pages 71-83, January.
    10. Florence Lachet-Touya, 2019. "The Assignment of a CSR Level of Action: Rule vs Discretion," Working papers of CATT hal-02141052, HAL.
    11. Gina Ionela Butnaru & Valentin Niţă & Cristiana Melinte & Alexandru Anichiti & Geanina Brînză, 2022. "The Nexus between Sustainable Behaviour of Tourists from Generation Z and the Factors That Influence the Protection of Environmental Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    12. Volker Lingnau & Florian Fuchs & Florian Beham, 2022. "The link between corporate sustainability and willingness to invest: new evidence from the field of ethical investments," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 335-369, September.
    13. Hong Wang & Baolong Ma & Rubing Bai, 2019. "How Does Green Product Knowledge Effectively Promote Green Purchase Intention?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, February.
    14. PUDARUTH Sharmila & JUWAHEER Thanika Devi & KOODRUTH UmmeYusra, 2017. "Understanding The Ecological Adoption Of Solar Water Heaters Among Customers Of Island Economies," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 12(1), pages 148-173, April.
    15. Pınar Basgoze, 2012. "Ethical Perceptions and Green Buying Behavior of Consumers: A Cross-National Exploratory Study," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 4(8), pages 477-488.
    16. Catherine Janssen & Joëlle Vanhamme, 2015. "Theoretical Lenses for Understanding the CSR–Consumer Paradox," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(4), pages 775-787, September.
    17. Guang-Wen Zheng & Abu Bakkar Siddik & Mohammad Masukujjaman & Syed Shah Alam & Alvina Akter, 2020. "Perceived Environmental Responsibilities and Green Buying Behavior: The Mediating Effect of Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-27, December.
    18. Shahid Rasool & Roberto Cerchione & Jari Salo, 2020. "Assessing ethical consumer behavior for sustainable development: The mediating role of brand attachment," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1620-1631, November.
    19. Joshi, Yatish & Rahman, Zillur, 2019. "Consumers' Sustainable Purchase Behaviour: Modeling the Impact of Psychological Factors," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 235-243.
    20. Mukesh Srivastava, 2014. "Profiling Sustainability Curriculum in AACSB Schools," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(2), pages 21582440145, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zag:market:v:32:y:2020:i:si:p:99-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tanja Komarac (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fefzghr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.