IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/wepxxx/v06y2020i03ns2382624x20710010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy Note: A Universal Equity–Efficiency Model for Pricing Water

Author

Listed:
  • Janice A. Beecher

    (Institute of Public Utilities, Michigan State University, United States)

Abstract

Drawing on theoretical, practical, and normative rationales, the analysis presented here calls for revisiting the prevailing water service paradigm, and the values and frames it reflects. As is increasingly apparent, current pricing policies may not be sufficiently responsive, pragmatic, or durable, particularly in reconciling competing objectives often cast as the equity–efficiency conundrum. Water is a social good that confers both private and public benefits. The proposed universal (all-inclusive) pricing model envisions five concurrent elements: recognize public functionality in cost allocation (scope economies), calibrate a minimum bill to property assessment (capacity value), provide an essential-use allowance for all households (public health), design cost-based rates for variable water usage (resource management), and prohibit disconnection and deploy service limiters instead (water security). The model advances meaningful structural progress toward social equity while comporting with generally accepted principles to fairly allocate costs and send economic price signals where they make sense.

Suggested Citation

  • Janice A. Beecher, 2020. "Policy Note: A Universal Equity–Efficiency Model for Pricing Water," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(03), pages 1-29, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:wepxxx:v:06:y:2020:i:03:n:s2382624x20710010
    DOI: 10.1142/S2382624X20710010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S2382624X20710010
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S2382624X20710010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Solis, Miriam & Bashar, Samira Binte, 2022. "Social equity implications of advanced water metering infrastructure," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    2. Salazar-Adams, Alejandro, 2021. "The efficiency of post-reform water utilities in Mexico," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    3. Simeone, Christina E. & Gagnon, Pieter & Cappers, Peter & Satchwell, Andrew, 2023. "The bill alignment test: Identifying trade-offs with residential rate design options," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    4. D'Amore, Gabriella & Landriani, Loris & Lepore, Luigi, 2021. "Ownership and sustainability of Italian water utilities: The stakeholder role," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    5. Warner, Mildred E. & Zhang, Xue & Rivas, Marcela González, 2020. "Which states and cities protect residents from water shutoffs in the COVID-19 pandemic?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    6. Rambonilaza, Tina & Rulleau, Bénédicte & Assouan, Epiphane, 2023. "On sharing the costs of public drinking water infrastructure renewal among users with different preferences," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    7. Pierce, Gregory & McBride, Justin & Adams, Jacqueline, 2022. "Subsidized or subsidizing? Municipal drinking water service funds in California," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    8. D'Amore, Gabriella & Landriani, Loris & Lepore, Luigi & Testa, Maria, 2024. "A multi-criteria model for measuring the sustainability orientation of Italian water utilities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    9. Sheng, Jichuan & Cheng, Qian & Yang, Hongqiang, 2024. "Water markets and water inequality: China's water rights trading pilot," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    10. Jessica J Goddard & Isha Ray & Carolina Balazs, 2021. "Water affordability and human right to water implications in California," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-24, January.
    11. Wichman, Casey, 2024. "Efficiency, Equity, and Cost-Recovery Trade-Offs in Municipal Water Pricing," RFF Working Paper Series 24-18, Resources for the Future.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:wepxxx:v:06:y:2020:i:03:n:s2382624x20710010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/wep/wep.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.