IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/serxxx/v66y2021i02ns0217590819430033.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy Security And Environmental Efficiency: Evidence From Oecd Countries

Author

Listed:
  • HUAPING SUN

    (School of Finance and Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, P. R. China)

  • MUHAMMAD IKRAM

    (#x2020;College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, P. R. China)

  • MUHAMMAD MOHSIN

    (School of Finance and Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, P. R. China)

  • QAISER ABBAS

    (#x2021;Department of Economics, Ghazi University Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan)

Abstract

Assessment of energy and environmental issues has received a special focus due to global warming and climate vulnerabilities. Energy, environment and economic development simultaneously yielded a combined effect, which is favorable from the economic point of view while unfavorable for environmental aspects. It is necessary to measure the energy, economic and environmental performance with appropriate methods. Therefore, this study measures the energy security and environmental efficiency. Data used in this study were collected from the official website of International Energy Agency (IEA), British Petroleum (BP) and World Bank. We employ a non-radial DEA technology for assessing energy and environmental efficiency for OECD countries. Results reveal that the values of energy intensity range from 0.93 to 0.30, while GHG emission per capita values range from 24.61 to 5.28. As far as energy efficiency is concerned, Iceland and Greece have the highest value (0.99) of energy efficiency, whereas Ireland has the lowest value (0.34) of energy efficiency. Further analysis shows that Austria, Australia, Portugal and Spain have values between 0.70 and 0.80 for energy intensity, whereas UK, Sweden, Germany and the USA have values of energy intensity, between 0.40 and 0.50. The study proposes some valuable policy implications for policy and decision-makers to make the environment more sustainable.

Suggested Citation

  • Huaping Sun & Muhammad Ikram & Muhammad Mohsin & Qaiser Abbas, 2021. "Energy Security And Environmental Efficiency: Evidence From Oecd Countries," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 66(02), pages 489-506, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:serxxx:v:66:y:2021:i:02:n:s0217590819430033
    DOI: 10.1142/S0217590819430033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0217590819430033
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0217590819430033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wu, Tai-Hsi & Huang, Shi-Wei & Lin, Mei-Chen & Wang, Hsin-Hua, 2023. "Energy security performance evaluation revisited: From the perspective of the energy supply chain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    2. Xiaomeng Zhao & Kangyin Dong & Jun Zhao & Qingzhe Jiang, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Paths to sustainable development in China: why green finance and green technology matter?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1-26, April.
    3. Hmouda, Ahmed M.O. & Orzes, Guido & Sauer, Philipp C., 2024. "Sustainable supply chain management in energy production: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Bahram Fathi & Malihe Ashena & Majid Anisi, 2023. "Efficiency evaluation of sustainability indicators in a two-stage network structure: a Nash bargaining game approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1832-1851, February.
    5. Wang, Shuhong & Liu, Xintian & Chen, Xueli & Song, Malin, 2024. "An evaluative study of economic security from the perspective of land resource assets," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:serxxx:v:66:y:2021:i:02:n:s0217590819430033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ser/ser.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.