IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/jikmxx/v16y2017i04ns0219649217500368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opinion Spam Detection in Online Reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Ajay Rastogi

    (Department of Computer Science, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India)

  • Monica Mehrotra

    (Department of Computer Science, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India)

Abstract

Online reviews are the most valuable sources of information about customer opinions and are considered the pillars on which the reputation of an organisation is built. From a customer’s perspective, review information is key to making a proper decision regarding an online purchase. Reviews are generally considered an unbiased opinion of an individual’s personal experience with a product, but the underlying truth about these reviews tells a different story. Spammers exploit these review platforms illegally because of incentives involved in writing fake reviews, thereby trying to gain an advantage over competitors resulting in an explosive growth of opinion spamming. The present study analyses and categorises the available literature on opinion spamming according to three detection targets: (1) opinion spam, (2) opinion spammers, and (3) collusive opinion spammer groups. The study further highlights and divides opinion spamming into three types based on textual and linguistic, behavioural, and relational features. Moreover, several state-of-the-art machine-learning techniques for opinion spam detection have also been discussed in the study. It concludes with a summary of the research articles on opinion spam detection and some interesting results to assist researchers for further exploration of the domain.

Suggested Citation

  • Ajay Rastogi & Monica Mehrotra, 2017. "Opinion Spam Detection in Online Reviews," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(04), pages 1-38, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:jikmxx:v:16:y:2017:i:04:n:s0219649217500368
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219649217500368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219649217500368
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219649217500368?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Luca & Georgios Zervas, 2016. "Fake It Till You Make It: Reputation, Competition, and Yelp Review Fraud," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(12), pages 3412-3427, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sunil Saumya & Jyoti Prakash Singh, 2022. "Spam review detection using LSTM autoencoder: an unsupervised approach," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 113-133, March.
    2. Bingol, Harun & Alatas, Bilal, 2023. "Chaos enhanced intelligent optimization-based novel deception detection system," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hui, Xiang & Klein, Tobias & Stahl, Konrad, 2022. "Learning from Online Ratings," CEPR Discussion Papers 17006, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. M. Narciso, 2022. "The Unreliability of Online Review Mechanisms," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 349-368, September.
    3. Gary Bolton & Kevin Breuer & Ben Greiner & Axel Ockenfels, 2023. "Fixing feedback revision rules in online markets," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 247-256, April.
    4. Sungsik Park & Woochoel Shin & Jinhong Xie, 2021. "The Fateful First Consumer Review," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 481-507, May.
    5. Lingfang (Ivy) Li & Steven Tadelis & Xiaolan Zhou, 2020. "Buying reputation as a signal of quality: Evidence from an online marketplace," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 51(4), pages 965-988, December.
    6. Plé, Loïc & Demangeot, Catherine, 2020. "Social contagion of online and offline deviant behaviors and its value outcomes: The case of tourism ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 886-896.
    7. Bastian, Bob & Zucchella, Antonella, 2023. "Nascent entrepreneurs during start-up competitions: Between beauty contests and co-created problematization," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    8. Gesche, Tobias, 2018. "Reference Price Shifts and Customer Antagonism: Evidence from Reviews for Online Auctions," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181650, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    9. Tim Kollmer & Andreas Eckhardt, 2023. "Dark Patterns," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(2), pages 201-208, April.
    10. Zhuang, Mengzhou & Cui, Geng & Peng, Ling, 2018. "Manufactured opinions: The effect of manipulating online product reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 24-35.
    11. Vollaard, Ben & van Ours, Jan C., 2022. "Bias in expert product reviews," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 105-118.
    12. Hung-Pin Shih & Pei-Chen Sung, 2021. "Addressing the Review-Based Learning and Private Information Approaches to Foster Platform Continuance," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 649-661, June.
    13. Surachartkumtonkun, Jiraporn (Nui) & Grace, Debra & Ross, Mitchell, 2021. "Unfair customer reviews: Third-party perceptions and managerial responses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 631-640.
    14. Christoph Carnehl & Maximilian Schaefer & André Stenzel & Kevin Ducbao Tran, 2022. "Value for Money and Selection: How Pricing Affects Airbnb Ratings," Working Papers 684, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    15. Junming Yin & Jerry Luo & Susan A. Brown, 2021. "Learning from Crowdsourced Multi-labeling: A Variational Bayesian Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 752-773, September.
    16. Jens Foerderer & Nele Lueker & Armin Heinzl, 2021. "And the Winner Is …? The Desirable and Undesirable Effects of Platform Awards," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1155-1172, December.
    17. Wen Zhang & Qiang Wang & Jian Li & Zhenzhong Ma & Gokul Bhandari & Rui Peng, 2023. "What makes deceptive online reviews? A linguistic analysis perspective," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    18. Apostolos Filippas & John J. Horton & Joseph M. Golden, 2022. "Reputation Inflation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 733-745, July.
    19. Lehrer, Steven & Xie, Tian & Zhang, Xinyu, 2021. "Social media sentiment, model uncertainty, and volatility forecasting," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    20. Theodoros Lappas & Gaurav Sabnis & Georgios Valkanas, 2016. "The Impact of Fake Reviews on Online Visibility: A Vulnerability Assessment of the Hotel Industry," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 940-961, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:jikmxx:v:16:y:2017:i:04:n:s0219649217500368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/jikm/jikm.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.