IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijtafx/v15y2012i02ns0219024912500173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Metrization Of Stochastic Dominance Rules

Author

Listed:
  • STOYAN V. STOYANOV

    (EDHEC Business School, EDHEC-Risk Institute–Asia, 1 George Street #07-02, Singapore 049145, Singapore)

  • SVETLOZAR T. RACHEV

    (Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Heavy Engineering S250, Stony Brook, NY 11794-3600, USA;
    Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany;
    FinAnalytica, USA)

  • FRANK J. FABOZZI

    (EDHEC Business School, 393, Promenade des Anglais BP3116, 0602-Nice, Cedex 3, France)

Abstract

We consider a new approach towards stochastic dominance rules which allows measuring the degree of domination or violation of a given stochastic order and represents a way of describing stochastic orders in general. Examples are provided for the n-th order stochastic dominance and stochastic orders based on a popular risk measure. We demonstrate how the new approach can be used for construction of portfolios dominating a given benchmark prospect.

Suggested Citation

  • Stoyan V. Stoyanov & Svetlozar T. Rachev & Frank J. Fabozzi, 2012. "Metrization Of Stochastic Dominance Rules," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 1-22.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijtafx:v:15:y:2012:i:02:n:s0219024912500173
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219024912500173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219024912500173
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219024912500173?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anand, Paul, 1995. "Foundations of Rational Choice Under Risk," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198774426.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Takashi Kamihigashi & John Stachurski, 2014. "An Axiomatic Approach to Measuring Degree of Stochastic Dominance," Discussion Paper Series DP2014-36, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    2. Takashi Kamihigashi & John Stachurski, 2014. "Partial Stochastic Dominance," Working Papers 2014-403, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    3. Asier Estevan & Roberto Maura & Óscar Valero, 2023. "Quasi-Metrics for Possibility Results: Intergenerational Preferences and Continuity," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    4. William B. Haskell & J. George Shanthikumar & Z. Max Shen, 2017. "Aspects of optimization with stochastic dominance," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 253(1), pages 247-273, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:cup:judgdm:v:8:y:2013:i:5:p:552-560 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Luca Zarri, 2010. "On social utility payoffs in games: a methodological comparison between Behavioural and Rational Game Theory," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 69(4), pages 587-598, October.
    3. S. Abu Turab Rizvi, 2001. "Preference Formation and the Axioms of Choice," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 141-159.
    4. Marc-Arthur Diaye & Michal Wong-Urdanivia, 2005. "A simple test of Richter-rationality," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00084390, HAL.
    5. Khalil, Elias, 2004. "Integrity, Shame and Self-Rationalization," Vassar College Department of Economics Working Paper Series 55, Vassar College Department of Economics.
    6. Heidelbach, Olaf, 2007. "Efficiency of selected risk management instruments: An empirical analysis of risk reduction in Kazakhstani crop production," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 40, number 92323.
    7. Mandeep K. Dhami & David R. Mandel, 2013. "How do defendants choose their trial court? Evidence for a heuristic processing account," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 8(5), pages 552-560, September.
    8. Soldatos, Gerasimos T., 1995. "Why People Tolerate Underground Economy and Tax Evasion?," MPRA Paper 58545, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Stephen A Gallo & Joanne H Sullivan & Scott R Glisson, 2016. "The Influence of Peer Reviewer Expertise on the Evaluation of Research Funding Applications," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    10. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2012-028 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Marc-Arthur Diaye & Michal Wong-Urdanivia, 2006. "A Simple Test of Richter-Rationality," Documents de recherche 06-01, Centre d'Études des Politiques Économiques (EPEE), Université d'Evry Val d'Essonne.
    12. Silberhorn, Nadja & Hildebrandt, Lutz, 2012. "Does umbrella branding really work? Investigating cross-category brand loyalty," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2012-028, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    13. Noraidatulakma Abdullah & Mohd Arman Kamaruddin & Ying-Xian Goh & Raihannah Othman & Andri Dauni & Nazihah Abd Jalal & Nurul Ain Mhd Yusuf & Salywana A. Kamat & Nor Hazlinawati Basri & Rahman Jamal, 2021. "Participants Attrition in a Longitudinal Study: The Malaysian Cohort Study Experience," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-9, July.
    14. Mandler, Michael, 2005. "Incomplete preferences and rational intransitivity of choice," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 255-277, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijtafx:v:15:y:2012:i:02:n:s0219024912500173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijtaf/ijtaf.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.